Table 1: Number of ongoing cases administered by the Court at year-end, 2007–2011 19

Table 2: Article 1(3) decisions, 2007–2010 25

Table 3: Number of new Requests for Arbitration registered, 2007–2011 35

Table 4: Number of parties identified in Requests for Arbitration, 2007–2011 40

Table 5: Configuration of parties identified in Requests for Arbitration, 2007–2011 40

Table 6: Decisions pursuant to Article 6(2) of the 1998 Rules, 2011 74

Table 7: Decisions pursuant to Article 6(2) of the 1998 Rules in cases involving multiple arbitration agreements, 2010 84

Table 8: Requests for joinder by number of additional parties, 2007–2011 98

Table 9: Confirmations and appointments of arbitrators who filed qualified Statements, 2007–2011 123

Table 10: Non-confirmations and non-appointments of arbitrators, 2007–2011 126

Table 11: Total number of confirmations and appointments of arbitrators, 2007–2011 136

Table 12: Number of different countries of origin of arbitrators confirmed/ appointed, 2007–2011 136

Table 13: Size of arbitral tribunals in cases submitted to the Court, 2007–2011 137

Table 14: Method of determining size of arbitral tribunal in cases submitted to the Court, 2007–2011 139

Table 15: Court determination of size of arbitral tribunal by amount in dispute, 2011 140

Table 16: Selection process for sole arbitrators, 2007–2011 142

Table 17: Selection process for co-arbitrators, 2007–2011 145

Table 18: Selection process for presidents of arbitral tribunals, 2007–2011 147

Table 19: Confirmations by decision maker, 2007–2011 160

Table 20: Challenges, 2001–2011 175

Table 21: Resignations of arbitrators, 2007–2011 182

Table 22: Replacements of arbitrators by cause of replacement, 2008–2010 183

Table 23: Number of arbitrators removed on the Court’s initiative, 2007–2011 184

Table 24: Number of Court decisions not to replace an arbitrator (truncated tribunals) pursuant to Article 12(5) of the 1998 Rules (now Article 15(5)), 2007–2011 194

Table 25: Number of different cities and countries selected as places of arbitration, 2007–2011 198

Table 26: Places of arbitration by region (and most common countries within each region), 2007–2011 199

Table 27: Cities most frequently selected as places of arbitration, 2011 201

Table 28: Method of determining the place of arbitration, 2007–2011 204

Table 29: Language of the arbitration determined in the parties’ arbitration agreement, 2006–2010 213

Table 30: Bilingual cases by combination of languages, 2006–2010 217

Table 31: Percentage of cases registered in which the parties’ contract specified the applicable law, 2007–2011

Table 32: Types of applicable rules of law specified in parties’ contracts, 2007–2011 223

Table 33: National laws chosen in parties’ contracts by region, 2007–2011 224

Table 34: Number of awards rendered, 2007–2011 312

Table 35: Number of awards rendered by three-member arbitral tribunals by type of decision, 2009–2011 316

Table 36: Dissenting opinion. Number of majority and president-only awards rendered by three-member arbitral tribunals in which there was or was not a dissenting opinion, 2009–2011 319

Table 37: Number of awards scrutinized by the Court by type of award, 2007–2011 331

Table 38: Language of awards, 2011 333

Table 39: Outcome of scrutiny process by type of award, 2007–2011 334

Table 40: Number of addenda rendered by arbitral tribunals on their own initiative to correct their awards, 2007–2011 348

Table 41: Applications by parties for correction or interpretation of awards, 2007–2011 349

Table 42: Amount in dispute (in US$) in cases pending on 27 January 2012 364

Table 43: Deemed withdrawals under Article 30(4) of the 1998 Rules (now Article 36(6)), 2007–2011 389

Table 44: Means by which cases ended, 2007–2011 412

Table 45: Timing of withdrawals, 2007–2011 413