Forgot your password?
Please enter your email & we will send your password to you:
My Account:
Copyright © International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). All rights reserved. ( Source of the document: ICC Digital Library )
An organisation contemplating making a foreign investment must consider a number of preliminary issues.
These issues are discussed in Chapters 2 through 5 and summarised here.
Chapter 2: National Regulation of Foreign Investment
Chapter 2 provides a checklist of host country regulations to be investigated when planning investments in a foreign country. The first step of course is to ascertain the host state laws and regulations governing foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI may well be regulated by one specific law, and overseen by a central government agency. However, FDI in particular industries may be subject to specific laws applicable to those industries alone. Once the laws and regulations have been ascertained, the potential investor should ask the following questions:
[Page19:]
Chapter 3: Extraterritorial Application of Home State Laws
Chapter 3 explains how the investor’s home state regulations governing economic sanctions must be taken into account by all investors contemplating foreign investment. Many states, particularly the United States (which has more than 35 sanctions programmes in place), and the European Union, operate sanctions programmes as foreign policy tools. Some of these apply broadly to prohibit transactions with particular countries; others apply to specific individuals or entities. Further, many countries also have strong anti-corruption laws, criminalising corrupt payments to foreign government officials. The foreign investor must maintain effective oversight over its own employees and its agents to ensure compliance with these laws.
Chapter 4: Taxation
Chapter 4 focuses on addressing two concerns that frequently arise when businesses and investors derive income from a foreign country: (i) the potential for double taxation, and (ii) the impact of transfer pricing rules.
Double taxation occurs when a business or investor is taxed in both its country of residence and the country in which it invests or operates. To minimise the impact of double taxation, states enter into bilateral tax treaties that sort out whether the host state, the home state, or both, will be entitled to tax income that a non-resident derives from the host state. Among other issues, double taxation treaties generally resolve which state may tax: (i) business operations in the host state; (ii) capital gains from the sale of host state assets; and (iii) dividends derived from host state companies.
Many states impose transfer pricing rules that apply to commonly-controlled business entities (such as a parent company and its subsidiaries) that are part of a multinational group. Transfer pricing rules seek to prevent the arbitrary shifting of profits from one group member to another to reduce the group’s overall international tax burden by comparing intra-group prices to the “arm’s length” prices that would be charged if unrelated parties were engaged in the same transaction.
Chapter 5: Political Risk Insurance
Chapter 5 examines political risk insurance, an important tool for protecting investments abroad. Political risks include expropriation, nationalisation, discriminatory regulation, and currency inconvertibility, or other events, such as war, civil disturbance or terrorism. These events are a fact of life for international business and often cannot be avoided. But the risks may be managed in a number of ways through political risk insurance, which is offered by around ninety public and private institutions. Export credit agencies such as the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and multilateral development banks, such as the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency of the World Bank (MIGA), provide political risk guarantees, as do a number of private insurers. Typically, political risk insurance covers three types of loss: currency inconvertibility, expropriation and political violence. More recently, insurers have offered coverage of losses resulting from a government’s failure to participate in an arbitration or pay an arbitral award, as well as insurance products to address financial crises, terrorism and climate change.
[Page20:]