{ "data": [ { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R196", "PublishedID": "R196", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Further notice of additional discrepancies; shipment by instalments", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 16(d) and Article 45", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R197", "PublishedID": "R197", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Report vs. Certificate", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R198", "PublishedID": "R198", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Need to mark documents original; pieces vs. boxes and cartons; content of certificates; proof of sending a cable advice; and duplicate vs. non-negotiable documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 22(c), Article 23 and miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R199", "PublishedID": "R199", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Several alleged discrepancies in an invoice, a certificate and a bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 22(c), 26(c)(iii), 27(b) and miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R200", "PublishedID": "R200", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the goods were irrevocably despatched and whether a nominated bank can unilaterally debit the account of the issuing bank/96", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 25(a)(i) and Article 27", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R201", "PublishedID": "R201", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Differences between the invoice and the covering schedule", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R202", "PublishedID": "R202", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Rights of recourse to the beneficiary in the event of fraud", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 3 and 4, sub-Articles 10(d) and 14(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R203", "PublishedID": "R203", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Certified copy of fax/telex vs. beneficiary's certificate", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a) and 10(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R204", "PublishedID": "R204", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Verifying signature on the covering schedule", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a) and 10(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R205", "PublishedID": "R205", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Drafts on the applicant, original documents and time limits under sub-Article 44(a)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a)(iv), 20(b) and 44(a) & (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R206", "PublishedID": "R206", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Deferred payment or payment at sight?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 10(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R207", "PublishedID": "R207", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Retransfer of credit; nominated bank's liability to pay; transfer of credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 10(c), 43(a) and Article 48", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R208", "PublishedID": "R208", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Description of goods in the invoice, the Ocean Bill of Lading and the packing list", "RelatedArticles": "Article 13 and sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R209", "PublishedID": "R209", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Typographical errors under sub-Article 13(a)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R210", "PublishedID": "R210", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Indication in documents of a date in different formats", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a) and 43(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R211", "PublishedID": "R211", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Must the issuing bank abide by nominating bank's checking of documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a) and (b), 14(b), d(i) and d(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R212", "PublishedID": "R212", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Non-documentary conditions", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(c) and Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R213", "PublishedID": "R213", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Beneficiary's name on the credit vs. name shown on invoice", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R214", "PublishedID": "R214", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Failure to endorse a bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R215", "PublishedID": "R215", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether "duplicate" or "triplicate" bills of lading have to be marked as originals", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R216", "PublishedID": "R216", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Which documents need to be marked "original"?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 20(b) and (c)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R217", "PublishedID": "R217", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Five queries concerning a set of documents presented to the Issuing Bank (IB) by the Negotiating Bank (NB) and rejected by the IB", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21 and sub-Articles 20(b), (c)(ii) and 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R218", "PublishedID": "R218", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Weight units on packing lists and B/L; rounding up/down of gross weight on B/L; difference in number of containers between B/L and packing list", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21 and miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R219", "PublishedID": "R219", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The Negotiable FIATA Multimodal Transport Bill of Lading", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R220", "PublishedID": "R220", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Bills of lading (ocean vessel vs. vessel shown in on board notation)", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R221", "PublishedID": "R221", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The relation of freight forwarder-type documents to transport documents", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 23, 30, 27 and 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R222", "PublishedID": "R222", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Signing of maritime documents by the carrier and by the agent", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R223", "PublishedID": "R223", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Charter Party Bill of Lading vs. BIMCO Liner Bill of Lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R224", "PublishedID": "R224", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Inconsistency in the bill of lading; wrong container number", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 23(a)(i), 34(b) and 48(h)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R225", "PublishedID": "R225", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The expression "Forwarder's Bill of Lading acceptable"", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 23(a)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii), (b), (c) and Article 30", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R226", "PublishedID": "R226", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": ""Port of discharge" and "Place of final destination"", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R227", "PublishedID": "R227", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Which port is the port of loading?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R228", "PublishedID": "R228", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The port of loading and the port of discharge indicated in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R229", "PublishedID": "R229", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Marine B/L: is there evidence of shipment from an Irish port?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R230", "PublishedID": "R230", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Acceptability of a document named "House Air Waybill"", "RelatedArticles": "Article 27", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R231", "PublishedID": "R231", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The name of the carrier on Air Waybills", "RelatedArticles": "Article 27 and sub-Article 27(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R232", "PublishedID": "R232", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Certificate of insurance", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 34(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R233", "PublishedID": "R233", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Certificate (Policy) of Marine Cargo Insurance signed on a broker's official stationery", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 34(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R234", "PublishedID": "R234", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Insurance documents with a franchise; insurance document showing cover effective during certain dates; consignee field on phytosanitary certificate", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 35(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R235", "PublishedID": "R235", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether description of goods in the commercial invoice matches the one in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R236", "PublishedID": "R236", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Description of goods in the invoice vs. description in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R237", "PublishedID": "R237", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "We have some queries about the data content on commercial invoice and packing list called for under a letter of credit. Part of the L/C requirements is quoted below for your reference:", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c) and Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R238", "PublishedID": "R238", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Allowances in quantity mentioned in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Article 39", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R239", "PublishedID": "R239", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can the amount of the drawing be inferior to the value of the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 39(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R240", "PublishedID": "R240", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can the amount of the drawing be inferior to the value of the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 39(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R241", "PublishedID": "R241", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Replacing discrepant documents within the validity date of an irrevocable credit", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 43 and 7, sub-Articles 10(c) and 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R242", "PublishedID": "R242", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The word "from" in sub-Article 47(a)", "RelatedArticles": "Article 47", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R243", "PublishedID": "R243", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Minor difference in the name of the notify party", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous provisions", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R244", "PublishedID": "R244", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Naming more than one transferring bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R245", "PublishedID": "R245", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Transfer of a letter of credit after presentation of conforming documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(a) and (h)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R246", "PublishedID": "R246", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Transferring an L/C, third party documents and shipment by instalments", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(a), Article 21 and Article 41", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-1996 (52)", "Opinion": "R247", "PublishedID": "R247", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the collection instruction has been complied with", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "URC 322", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R248", "PublishedID": "R248", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is a credit subject to UCP 500 if this fact is not mentioned in the SWIFT credit advice?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R249", "PublishedID": "R249", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can branches of a bank issue a standby L/C to each other?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 1 and 2", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R250", "PublishedID": "R250", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Redress if overseas branch of an issuing bank is unable to meet its obligations", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2 and sub-Article 10(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R251", "PublishedID": "R251", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Description of goods under a credit; linkage between documents; compliance and consistency", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4, Sub-Articles 13(a) and 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R252", "PublishedID": "R252", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Consequences of an original B/L being sent to the applicant or to a third party", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R253", "PublishedID": "R253", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Effect of a subsequent embargo on payment for the goods", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R254", "PublishedID": "R254", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Must the issuing bank follow instructions of the applicant and pay against discrepant documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 9, sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R255", "PublishedID": "R255", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Drafts on the issuing bank; shipment on two different vessels; the word ‘‘approximately’’ in relation to the ratio of goods", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a) and 39(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R256", "PublishedID": "R256", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is physical acceptance of a draft required?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(a)(iii)(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R257", "PublishedID": "R257", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Documents presented to the confirming bank on the last day of expiry; banks stipulating a last date for presentment and negotiation of documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(b) and 42(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R258", "PublishedID": "R258", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The manner in which acceptance or rejection of amendments may be indicated", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(d)(ii) and 9(d)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R259", "PublishedID": "R259", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Negotiating with recourse", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 10(b)(ii) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R260", "PublishedID": "R260", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Requirement for description of goods on documents other than the commercial invoice", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a) and 37(c); Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R261", "PublishedID": "R261", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does the issuing bank have the right to investigate whether ports are actually ports?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R262", "PublishedID": "R262", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Failure to deliver notice of refusal within time limit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(b) and 14(d)(i); Article 162", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R263", "PublishedID": "R263", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Effect of a court injunction after acceptance of documents and advice of maturity date", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R264", "PublishedID": "R264", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Seven banking day rule as an outer guideline and rights of recourse", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R265", "PublishedID": "R265", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "What constitutes a bank's business hours for the purposes of sub-Article 13(b)?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b),45", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R266", "PublishedID": "R266", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is the due date of a credit calculated from the date of receipt of the documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R267", "PublishedID": "R267", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does receipt of a waiver from the applicant bind the issuing bank to accept the documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(b) and (d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R268", "PublishedID": "R268", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether documents invalidate themselves if dated after the date of shipment; effect of a waiver on the issuing bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(c), (d)(i) and (d)(2)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R269", "PublishedID": "R269", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can a bank partially accept a document under an L/C?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R270", "PublishedID": "R270", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Commencement of an acceptance date; previously accepted discrepancies acceptable for next presentation; confirming bank as agent of issuing bank; transfer L/Cs; assignment of proceeds; reasonable time", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d)(i), 48(i), Article 49, sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R271", "PublishedID": "R271", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is providing more than a single notice of rejection valid?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R272", "PublishedID": "R272", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The scope of the word «banks» in Article 16", "RelatedArticles": "Article 16", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R273", "PublishedID": "R273", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can exporters back out of paying L/C confirmation charges to the confirming bank?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 18(c)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R274", "PublishedID": "R274", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Original documents and the question of signatures", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R275", "PublishedID": "R275", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": ""Legalization" under sub-Article 20(d)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R276", "PublishedID": "R276", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Consignee on certificate of origin different to that on bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R277", "PublishedID": "R277", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a mis-spelling of the beneficiary's and the applicant's names constitute a discrepancy under UCP 500 Article 21.", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R278", "PublishedID": "R278", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is an FCR a transport document? Is insurance certificate issued on insurance broker's letterhead acceptable under sub-Article 34(a)?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 21 and 28; sub-Article 34(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R279", "PublishedID": "R279", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The phrase "appears on its face" in Article 23", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R280", "PublishedID": "R280", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "In a port-to-port bill of lading must any place of receipt or place of final destination also be a port?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R281", "PublishedID": "R281", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Charter parties and "shipment to"", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 23 and 25", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R282", "PublishedID": "R282", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": ""Taken in charge", the port of loading and the place of receipt", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R283", "PublishedID": "R283", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": ""Intended vessel" or similar qualification on a B/L", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R284", "PublishedID": "R284", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Date of shipment on marine bills of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R285", "PublishedID": "R285", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Should a non-negotiable sea waybill or a multimodal transport document only bear one date?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 24(a)(ii) and 26(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R286", "PublishedID": "R286", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Bill of lading endorsed with an agent stamp only", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 25(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R287", "PublishedID": "R287", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does an Air Waybill issued by a freight forwarder have to be countersigned by the actual carrier?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 27", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R288", "PublishedID": "R288", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does a CMR document have to bear the signatures of the sender and/or recipient?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R289", "PublishedID": "R289", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The words "carriage free" v. "freight prepaid"; lack of the credit number on a railway bill", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 33(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R290", "PublishedID": "R290", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Insurance document bearing a date of issuance later than the date of loading on board.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 34(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R291", "PublishedID": "R291", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Commercial invoices issued in a name other than the beneficiary named in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R292", "PublishedID": "R292", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does an advance payment have to be mentioned in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R293", "PublishedID": "R293", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the 10% tolerance can be used for unit prices and for the amount of the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 39(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R294", "PublishedID": "R294", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Use of the word «from» in relation to negotiation period; whether documents may be presented on the expiry date.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 47(a), 42(a) and 43(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R295", "PublishedID": "R295", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "To what extent should transferring document advise the presenter about the fate of the documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 48", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R296", "PublishedID": "R296", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "In a transferred credit, can the requirement for a pre-shipment inspection and a security label be deleted?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(h)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R297", "PublishedID": "R297", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Rights of the first and second beneficiaries under a transferred L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(h) and (i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R298", "PublishedID": "R298", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Negotiating bank's courier receipt to be marked with the credit number?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R299", "PublishedID": "R299", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When a usance credit is a sight credit", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R300", "PublishedID": "R300", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The meaning of the words «our principal» and «principals» in an L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R301", "PublishedID": "R301", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Duly endorsed» to be part of the endorsement on an insurance document", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1997 (55)", "Opinion": "R302", "PublishedID": "R302", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Refunds under a red clause credit", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R303", "PublishedID": "R303", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether it was "improper" to use a standby letter of credit in the context of a commercial transaction", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R304", "PublishedID": "R304", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a two-party credit is a valid L/C and whether it can be issued subject to UCP 500", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R305", "PublishedID": "R305", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Which will prevail, the provisions of UCP or the decision of a local court? Is UCP applicable when SWIFT message types do not refer to it?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 4 and 1", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R306", "PublishedID": "R306", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether banks need to be concerned with the routing of the goods or their delivery; problems where goods are consigned to an applicant under an L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4, Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R307", "PublishedID": "R307", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Shipment authorizations and discrepancy fees", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 5(a) and (b); Article 21; Sub-Articles 13(a) and 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R308", "PublishedID": "R308", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a document clearly requests the insertion of the unit price as part of the content, must the beneficiary comply?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 5(b), 13(a), 13(c) and 20(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R309", "PublishedID": "R309", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does providing notice of acceptance, despite discrepancies in the documents, obligate the issuing bank to effect settlement on the due date?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R310", "PublishedID": "R310", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can the issuing bank cancel the L/C unilaterally on the basis of the quality of goods?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(a), Article 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R311", "PublishedID": "R311", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a court order allowed the buyer not to honour acceptance on the due date", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(a)(iii)(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R312", "PublishedID": "R312", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When a court order bars an issuing bank from paying drafts at maturity", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a)(iii) and (iii)(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R313", "PublishedID": "R313", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The implication of confirmation by a confirming bank; the meaning of the term "within given periods" in the context of an L/C with instalment shipments/drawings", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(b); Article 41", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R314", "PublishedID": "R314", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank is irrevocably bound by an amendment it issues", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(d)(i) and d(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R315", "PublishedID": "R315", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank and/or advising bank can give a deadline for the notification of an amendment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(d)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R316", "PublishedID": "R316", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a presentation is made directly to the issuing bank, is the nominated bank entitled to deduct any negotiation commission?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 10(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R317", "PublishedID": "R317", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When an issuing bank includes a reimbursement instruction in its credit that requires the negotiating bank to claim from it and says it will honour the claim according to the negotiating bank's instructions, does this apply to the honouring of the claim w", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 10(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R318", "PublishedID": "R318", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Characteristics of a pre-advice; effects of a request from the first beneficiary to transfer a credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 11(c), Article 48", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R319", "PublishedID": "R319", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When an L/C contains unclear stipulations", "RelatedArticles": "Article 12, Article 5", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R320", "PublishedID": "R320", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the certificate of origin provided a clear indication of the origin of goods", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R321", "PublishedID": "R321", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "An issuing bank in Country K opened an irrevocable L/C stipulating, as a special condition 'Statement of Origin issued by exporter should have the content as follows: All goods bear the country of origin on the surface of the goods.'", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R322", "PublishedID": "R322", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Would an insurance policy be acceptable if it were issued to bearer, notwithstanding the fact that the L/C requires an insurance policy endorsed in blank?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R323", "PublishedID": "R323", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When an issuing bank clearly instructs that goods are to be consigned to the applicant, is the issuing bank bound to pay and can it refuse payment on the grounds of any discrepancy?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a) and (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R324", "PublishedID": "R324", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Modified documents which arrive after the expiry of the credit; how the issuing bank deals with the documents if the applicant refuses to pay and beneficiary does not ask for their return", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a) and 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R325", "PublishedID": "R325", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Subject: UCP 500, Standard for Examination of Documents.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R327", "PublishedID": "R327", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the receipt by an issuing bank of a waiver from the applicant binds the issuing bank to honour the documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(c) and 14(d)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R328", "PublishedID": "R328", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a bank finds "new" discrepancies on re-presented documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R329", "PublishedID": "R329", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a bank fails to provide a notice of rejection which contains a listing of the discrepancy(ies)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R330", "PublishedID": "R330", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When the credit and/or LOI wording should specify clearly the basis upon which the LOI will be released", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R331", "PublishedID": "R331", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Reasonable time for rejection; holding the documents at the disposal of the presenter", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R332", "PublishedID": "R332", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does accepting discrepant documents mean that a bank has to accept similar discrepancies on future drawings?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R333", "PublishedID": "R333", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can URC be used instead of UCP when applicant fails to provide covering funds on the due date?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d)(i) and (ii); Sub-Article 14(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R334", "PublishedID": "R334", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A commissioning certificate and an implied authority to release the goods", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R335", "PublishedID": "R335", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is Article 16 restricted to loss of telecommunication advices? Does the word "clean" have to appear on a bill of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 16, Sub-Article 32(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R336", "PublishedID": "R336", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Effect of government sanctions on a bank's ability to pay under an L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Article 17 (Article 19 UCP 400)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R337", "PublishedID": "R337", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a non-negotiable copy of a B/L needs to be signed; whether a company chop constitutes a signature", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R338", "PublishedID": "R338", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a credit requires 3 commercial invoices and 3 packing lists, is this satisfied by the presentation of one of each of the documents being marked original and two copies either marked copy or not marked as an original?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 20(b) and 20(c)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R339", "PublishedID": "R339", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Wrong pro-forma invoice number in the commercial invoice; L/C number added in handwriting; improper date indicated; DA incorporating words that indicate a poor condition of the goods", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R340", "PublishedID": "R340", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a documentary credit calls for a certificate of origin, should this mean such certificates of origin as issued by an approved/authorized body?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21, Sub-Article 5(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R341", "PublishedID": "R341", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Must the on board notation be signed? What is the time limit for reimbursements? If fraudulent documents are presented, who bears the burden of proof?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21, Sub-Article 14(d)(iii), Article 15", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R342", "PublishedID": "R342", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Which UCP Article applies when a transport document shows shipment from one port to another (with or without transhipment), utilizing only one mode of transport?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R343", "PublishedID": "R343", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the issuer of a forwarder's bill of lading (FBL) remains responsible for the shipping of the goods up to the final destination", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 23 and 30", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R344", "PublishedID": "R344", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an authentication to an alteration on a bill of lading may be made by any agent of the carrier/master without limitation as to whether that party signed the bill of lading and/or authenticated any other alteration within that document", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R345", "PublishedID": "R345", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a B/L included the name of a carrier on its face; spelling errors and discrepancies", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R346", "PublishedID": "R346", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the addition of an on board notation requires the insertion of a separate date.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R347", "PublishedID": "R347", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it necessary to stipulate the on board date again on the B/L, even though an on board notation has been shown by pre-printed wording duly dated on the front page of the B/L?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R348", "PublishedID": "R348", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether Singapore CY is considered to be the same place as Singapore (when Singapore is shown as the port of loading); whether the reference to banks in Article 17 refers only to the nominated bank in the L/C or to all banks", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii); Article 17", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R349", "PublishedID": "R349", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the phrase "substitute vessel" constitutes a "similar qualification" under sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 23(a)(ii) and 23(a)(v)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R350", "PublishedID": "R350", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When "place of receipt" and "port of loading" are the same place name", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R351", "PublishedID": "R351", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the bills of lading presented did not indicate the number of originals that had been issued and the shipping company produced an additional certificate stating the number that had been issued", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 23(a)(iv) and 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R352", "PublishedID": "R352", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a reference to loaded on board or shipped on a named vessel refers to an ocean vessel or any pre-carriage vessel; letters of credit prohibiting transhipment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 23(b) and 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R353", "PublishedID": "R353", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does a multimodal type document need to state that the transport document is to evidence that more than one mode of transport will be utilized in the course of the shipment?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 26, Sub-Article 26(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R354", "PublishedID": "R354", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A bill of lading indicating that the agent was signing "for the master" and "for the carrier"", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 26(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R355", "PublishedID": "R355", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the final destination stipulated in the credit is different from the port of discharge", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 26(a)(iii)(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R357", "PublishedID": "R357", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the credit terms needed to specify who the transport document should have been consigned to and whether a presented CMR was discrepant in view of Article 28", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 28(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R358", "PublishedID": "R358", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a bill of lading stating "Perishable Cargo on Deck at Shipper's Risk" should be rejected", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 31(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R359", "PublishedID": "R359", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When an insurance document is issued in more than one original", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 34(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R360", "PublishedID": "R360", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does sub-Article 35(b) apply when the insurance document details the insurance requirements?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 35(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R361", "PublishedID": "R361", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Should a bank accept a presentation of documents which shows a deduction for an advance payment?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R362", "PublishedID": "R362", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the trade term is part of description of goods under a documentary credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R363", "PublishedID": "R363", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the description of the goods in the insurance policy corresponded with the description in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R364", "PublishedID": "R364", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether non-negotiable copies of the B/L need to be signed; whether a goods description must appear on any document other than the commercial invoice", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c), Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R365", "PublishedID": "R365", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can the 10% tolerance be used, not only for the quantity, but also for the amount of the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 39(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R366", "PublishedID": "R366", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When a credit provides two alternative methods for calculating the goods shipped", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 39(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R367", "PublishedID": "R367", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A further explanation of sub-Articles 39(b) and (c)", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 39(b) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R368", "PublishedID": "R368", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Bills of lading indicating more than one port of discharge", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 40(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R369", "PublishedID": "R369", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether wagons attached to the same train for the same journey constitute a partial shipment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 40(b); miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R370", "PublishedID": "R370", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether transport documents are acceptable which cover shipment on the same vessel but from different ports of loading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 40(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R371", "PublishedID": "R371", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether shipments must be made in accordance with the shipping schedule; whether the CMR must be signed and marked "copy for shipper"", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 41 and 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R372", "PublishedID": "R372", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the confirming or nominated bank has to indicate to the issuing bank the date of receipt of documents or the date of negotiation", "RelatedArticles": "Article 43, sub-Articles 40(b) and 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R373", "PublishedID": "R373", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a schedule is dated after the latest permitted date of presentation and/or expiry date", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 44(a) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R374", "PublishedID": "R374", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The right to substitute the invoice and draft; amending the terms and conditions; first and second beneficiaries and amendments; where the shipper is different from the issuer of the invoice", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(i), 48(h) and 48(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R375", "PublishedID": "R375", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Several questions concerning transferred credits", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(i) and 48(h)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R376", "PublishedID": "R376", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Responsibility of the buyer under Ex Works to ensure that instructions regarding transhipment are complied with and that insurance covers transport risks", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R377", "PublishedID": "R377", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a certificate of origin issued by the chamber of commerce in the country of export showing goods of origin in the country of manufacture would meet the requirements of the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R378", "PublishedID": "R378", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Determination of the due date of a credit with drafts to be drawn on the confirming bank at 120 days sight", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R379", "PublishedID": "R379", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Effect of a temporary restraining order on a bank's willingness to pay", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R380", "PublishedID": "R380", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When L/C issuing banks charge a transmission or payment fee for the remittance of proceeds under their credits", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R381", "PublishedID": "R381", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where there are differences between the commercial invoice and the credit", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 400 Sub-Article 41(c)", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R382", "PublishedID": "R382", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Responsibilities of the collecting bank to promptly inform the remitting bank when documents are stolen from one of its branches", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522, Articles 1, 9 and 26", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R383", "PublishedID": "R383", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Remedies for apparent failures by the banks to act within their mandates; the release of goods against a bill of lading not properly endorsed and the enforceability of the accepted draft", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Sub-Articles 1(c), 1(f), 11(b) and 12(a)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1998 - 1999 (80)", "Opinion": "R384", "PublishedID": "R384", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When multiple collections are routed to a collecting bank", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Sub-Articles 2(a) and 2(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R385", "PublishedID": "R385", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Can an issuing bank issue its letters of credit subject to the UCP 500 and to matters not governed therein, to the laws of the country of issuance?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R386", "PublishedID": "R386", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it mandatory that all documentary credits be made subject to UCP 500? If a bank acts in violation of UCP interpretation on transferable credits, is it accountable to compensate?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1, sub-Article 48(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R387", "PublishedID": "R387", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether branches of a bank in the same country are considered to be the same bank", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R388", "PublishedID": "R388", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a bank looked beyond the documents; whether the operativeness of the credit subject to the issuance and acceptance of a bank guarantee detracted from the irrevocable nature of the credit; whether a condition regarding the issuance of a guarantee s", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 2, 4, 6 and 12; sub-Articles 13(c), 14(b) and 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R389", "PublishedID": "R389", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Was there a requirement in the L/C for transport details to appear within the certificate of origin? Must all documents have a description of goods, which is exactly as shown in the credit? Must a bill of lading indicate the voyage number for a particular", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 4, 21 and 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R390", "PublishedID": "R390", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether B/Ls must indicate that unloading charges were included within the "freight" amount that had been paid; conflict between the certificate of quality and the invoice", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 4 and 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R391", "PublishedID": "R391", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a credit incorporates excessive detail, is the negotiating bank or the issuing bank under an obligation to carry out detailed mathematical calculations to establish compliance?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 5(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R392", "PublishedID": "R392", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Meaning of the term "exporting country"", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 5(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R393", "PublishedID": "R393", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Use of the words "engagement" or "responsibility" by the advising bank in advising a credit", "RelatedArticles": "Article 7", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R394", "PublishedID": "R394", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a L/C was issued under conditions contrary to national law", "RelatedArticles": "Article 9", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R395", "PublishedID": "R395", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Words in irrevocable credits appearing to make them "inoperative" under certain conditions", "RelatedArticles": "Article 9", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R396", "PublishedID": "R396", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a bank tried to amend or cancel an irrevocable L/C; impact of this on further advances under the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Article 9 of UCP 500", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R397", "PublishedID": "R397", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Who is the formal debtor in the event of a confirmed L/C, the applicant or the confirming bank?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a) and (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R398", "PublishedID": "R398", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When has a bank negotiated against documents and when has it paid against documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a)(i), 9(a)(iv) and 10(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R399", "PublishedID": "R399", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Role of the confirming bank and the reimbursing bank where the confirming bank sends conforming documents to the reimbursing bank for acceptance and discount", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(b)(iii)(b) and (iv)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R400", "PublishedID": "R400", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a beneficiary, not being a party to a re-financing arrangement between two banks, was under an obligation to reimburse a percentage of the drawing amount", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 10(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R401", "PublishedID": "R401", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The handling of letters of credit where the advising bank is requested to send the credit to the beneficiary via the intermediary of another bank", "RelatedArticles": "Article 11", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R402", "PublishedID": "R402", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a "Payment Release" document was required to be presented under the letter of credit terms", "RelatedArticles": "Article 12", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R403", "PublishedID": "R403", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Inspection certificate signed by an inspector other than the one requested by the applicant", "RelatedArticles": "Article 13", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R404", "PublishedID": "R404", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Significance of the statement "We confirm all terms are complied with" in a claim under a standby letter of credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R405", "PublishedID": "R405", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a certificate of origin was issued under one name and endorsed under another name", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R406", "PublishedID": "R406", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where an air waybill evidences goods consigned to a party other than the one mentioned in the credit and the airline changes the consignee without amending the original AWB; whether the fact that applicant took control of the goods binds the issuing bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R408", "PublishedID": "R408", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Impact of typing error in a beneficiary's certificate", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R409", "PublishedID": "R409", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a minor difference in the shipping marks on a documents can be deemed as a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(a); Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R410", "PublishedID": "R410", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Must the issuing bank, having issued a notice of rejection of documents, chase the applicant for further instructions?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(b) and Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R411", "PublishedID": "R411", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the signing party is a courier company, freight forwarder or agent, is it necessary that these parties sign the transport document as an agent for a named carrier? What is the distinction between "by" and "through" in describing shipment?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 13(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R412", "PublishedID": "R412", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a requirement in SWIFT field 47A was non-documentary; where a countersignature by the representative of the applicant gave his status as being from another company", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(c) and 37(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R413", "PublishedID": "R413", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it possible for an opening bank to refuse payment because of a discrepancy when the B/L is endorsed to the buyer?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R414", "PublishedID": "R414", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where one of the original B/Ls are to be sent directly to the applicant or his agent and it is consigned to the order of the issuing bank; if a B/L shows a consignee to be a party other than the issuing bank", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R415", "PublishedID": "R415", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "If documents are presented in two mailings, what must be included in the first mailing to comply with Article 14?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R416", "PublishedID": "R416", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Restricting negotiation to a particular branch of a bank; where documents have been presented within the expiry date and/or the latest date for presentation of documents, but the schedule of the nominated bank is dated after such date", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14; sub-Articles 9(a), 13(b) and 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R417", "PublishedID": "R417", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an absence of the indication of "Original" on the invoices constitutes a discrepancy; whether a negotiating bank needs to endorse an insurance document; whether all documents issued by a beneficiary need to be signed by the same person", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14; sub-Article 13(a); and the ICC Decision on Original Documents", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R418", "PublishedID": "R418", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the issuing bank states it will release documents (against a waiver from the applicant) provided it does not have any contrary instructions from the presenter", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14; sub-Article 14(d)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R419", "PublishedID": "R419", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is there a timeframe within which a negotiating bank should inform the beneficiary after receiving a communication from the issuing bank concerning the status of the documents? Is a bank under an obligation to accept an invoice for an amount which is grea", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14; sub-Articles 37(b) and 31(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R420", "PublishedID": "R420", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the charter party contract date shown on the B/L in a language other than in English was a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(a)(i) and (ii) and 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R421", "PublishedID": "R421", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank, after serving notice of rejection, has the right to dispose of documents to the applicant, if the presenter has not approved", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(c), 14(d)(i) and (ii) and 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R422", "PublishedID": "R422", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the issuing bank claimed interest from the nominated bank after the nominated bank decided to negotiate under reserve", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d) and 14(d)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R423", "PublishedID": "R423", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Obligations of the opening bank to examine the documents presented under the credit and whether it could avoid the examination based on the fact that it had been done by the confirming bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d) and (f)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R424", "PublishedID": "R424", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a refusal notice sent after banking hours on the seventh banking day was acceptable", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R425", "PublishedID": "R425", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the rejection notice was sent to another branch of the bank in the same country; consequences if an issuing bank fails to provide a notice of refusal within a reasonable time", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R426", "PublishedID": "R426", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a standby L/C was issued subject to UCP 500 but a remittance schedule under URC 522 was presented; where the beneficiary's declaration had no issuing date; where an unpaid invoice had the wrong credit number; where an air waybill was presented inste", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R427", "PublishedID": "R427", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "What constitutes a clear indication of refusal under a notice of dishonour from the confirming bank, so as to comply with the conditions of Article 14?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d)(i) and 14(d); Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R428", "PublishedID": "R428", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the issuing bank issued the notice of discrepancies in good time and the advising bank argued that the goods had already been cleared; where a packing list showed a gross weight of the whole consignment and not the individual weight of each package", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d)(i) and (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R429", "PublishedID": "R429", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "What do the phrases "hold the documents at the disposal of the presenter" and "to return the documents to the presenter" mean? Can a documentary credit specify the presentation of a document confirming that the applicant has inspected and accepted the goo", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(d)(ii) and 14(d); Article 16", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R430", "PublishedID": "R430", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Questions concerning notices of refusal sent by an issuing bank to the presenter", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(ii) and 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R431", "PublishedID": "R431", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a confirming bank has more than one opportunity to give a notice of refusal; whether an FCR is a transport document; name of vessel spelled differently on different documents; whether different abbreviations constitute a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 14(d)(ii), Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R432", "PublishedID": "R432", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "If a bill of lading indicates "freight paid", is a bank is obliged to check that the freight has actually been paid?; the proper use of the Incoterms CFR and CPT", "RelatedArticles": "Article 15, sub-Article 33(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R433", "PublishedID": "R433", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Payment of charges under an L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 18(c)(ii)", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R434", "PublishedID": "R434", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The validity of a claim made under a letter of credit which was issued subject to UCP 500, but for which the reimbursement was not subject to URR 525", "RelatedArticles": "Article 19", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R435", "PublishedID": "R435", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Must payment be made within seven days from the date of negotiation with the negotiating bank, or is it seven days from date of negotiating with the issuing bank?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 19; URR 525 Article 11", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R436", "PublishedID": "R436", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank is obliged to inform any other party under the credit of the changed financial standing of the applicant; can an issuing bank change the place of payment without the agreement of the beneficiary and confirming bank?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 19(c); URR 525 sub-Articles 8(a) and 8(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R437", "PublishedID": "R437", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The meaning of a "facsimile signed document" and "photocopy of another document"", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R438", "PublishedID": "R438", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where bill of lading and signatures thereon are produced by imaging technology and sent via the Internet, can they qualify as original documents under sub-Article 20(b)?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(b), Articles 23 and 26 and the ICC Decision on Original Documents", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R439", "PublishedID": "R439", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Are EDI messages proper documents under various ICC rules?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 500 sub-Article 20(b); URC 522 Article 2; ISP98 RULE 1.09A; URDG sub-Article 2(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R440", "PublishedID": "R440", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether reference to the name of the issuing bank followed by the actual branch of the applicant was discrepant; meaning of a document to be issued in 3 copies", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(c)(ii); ICC Decision on Original Documents", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R441", "PublishedID": "R441", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a letter of credit required the invoice to be stamped by a customs office; where an issuing bank intends to deduct a discrepancy fee, should there be a reference to this within the text of the credit together with an indication of the fee?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 20(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R442", "PublishedID": "R442", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a misspelling in the title of a document constitutes a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R443", "PublishedID": "R443", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Does a document named as a certificate need to be dated?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R444", "PublishedID": "R444", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Packing list/weight memo undated; beneficiary's certificate showing wrong fax number; shipping mark shown on B/L inconsistent with that in other documents", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R445", "PublishedID": "R445", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the weight shown on the Ullage Report was less than that shown on other documents", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R446", "PublishedID": "R446", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Was the issuing bank justified in rejecting documents if the inspection certificate was not signed according to the mandate held in its files?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R447", "PublishedID": "R447", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether it is a discrepancy if packing lists indicate the quantity for each package whereas other documents show the quantity of total packages", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R448", "PublishedID": "R448", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The criteria that will apply when a credit requires that a certificate of origin be issued by a chamber of commerce", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R449", "PublishedID": "R449", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a certificate of quality was consistent with other documents and whether the credit required that dates in the document be checked", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R450", "PublishedID": "R450", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an inspection report signed by a company acting for the insurance agent was discrepant", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R451", "PublishedID": "R451", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a requirement in a credit for a document to be issued in a specific language prohibits other languages or dual languages being used", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R452", "PublishedID": "R452", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The need for separate fields to be constructed within the SWIFT MT700 format; where originals had been altered and the bank required a similar "authenticated" amendment to appear on the non-negotiable copies", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R453", "PublishedID": "R453", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where two vessels are quoted but only one port, does the bill of lading require an on board notation stating the name of the vessel?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R454", "PublishedID": "R454", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A marine or ocean bill of lading in which either the port of loading or discharge, as specified in the credit, are not actual ports", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23, sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R455", "PublishedID": "R455", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a copy of a bill of lading needs to be signed; whether the use of "Ltd" instead of "Limited" constitutes a discrepancy; whether the description of goods in the invoice corresponded with the description in the credit; whether amendments to document", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 23 and 37; sub-Articles 23(a)(ii) and 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R456", "PublishedID": "R456", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A document "however named" under Article 23; whether the description of goods in the commercial invoice corresponded with the description in the credit; whether a transferring bank is under an obligation to effect a transfer except to the extent and in th", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23; sub-Articles 37(c) and 48(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R457", "PublishedID": "R457", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Several cases concerning the on board notation on the bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R458", "PublishedID": "R458", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an on board notation indicating transhipment can make acceptable a B/L that shows a different place of receipt from a port of loading and discharge", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R459", "PublishedID": "R459", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Port of loading stated as "Any European Port" where a specific port was mentioned elsewhere in the credit; whether a second on board notation reflected late shipment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R460", "PublishedID": "R460", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the ports of loading and discharge mentioned in the credit were correctly identified within the bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R461", "PublishedID": "R461", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the transport document should have had an on board notation", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 26(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R462", "PublishedID": "R462", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it sufficient that the on board notation state the name of the port without qualification that it is the "port of loading"? Must a multimodal transport document evidence the individual modes?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 26(a)(iii)(a); Article 26", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R463", "PublishedID": "R463", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether an air waybill has to be signed by a shipper or his agent", "RelatedArticles": "Article 27", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R464", "PublishedID": "R464", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "In an air transport shipment, if the issuing bank does not want transhipment to occur, will it have to specifically exclude sub-Article 27(c) in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 500 Sub-Article 27(c); UCP 400 sub-Articles 29(b) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R465", "PublishedID": "R465", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is a CMR acceptable under a letter of credit requiring the presentation of a document entitled "roadwaybill"?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 28(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R466", "PublishedID": "R466", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is a CMR consignment note showing two or more different carriers, their names being stated in the fields headed "Carrier" (field 16) and "Successive carriers" (field 17) respectively, acceptable - and can either carrier be a signatory(ies) of the note?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 28(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R467", "PublishedID": "R467", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a document stating "franco de port (place of destination)" would be acceptable under a credit requiring the transport document to evidence payment of freight; where the issuing bank refused the CMR because it did not show that it was a copy for th", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 33(b); Article 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R468", "PublishedID": "R468", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Questions concering whether insurance must be precisely 110% or whether it can be rounded up; if the credit is silent regarding the insurance coverage, must the insurance cover the entire voyage reflected in the transport document?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 34(f)(ii), 34(e) and 35(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R469", "PublishedID": "R469", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the use of a "Millenium" clause is acceptable under all risks coverage", "RelatedArticles": "Article 36", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R470", "PublishedID": "R470", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether seven days was a "reasonable time" to refuse documents in a specific case; whether there was requirement for the address of the applicant to appear; whether conflicting addresses constituted a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 37(a) and 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R471", "PublishedID": "R471", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the commercial invoice complied with the credit in including all of the details, even though it was not in the same format or layout as the description shown in the credit.", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 500 Sub-Article 41(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R472", "PublishedID": "R472", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where quantity in invoice differs from B/L quantity; where signature in B/L does not indicate on whose behalf signed; where B/L on board notation does not show any date", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c); sub-Articles 23(a)(i) and 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R473", "PublishedID": "R473", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether sub-Article 37(c) requires a goods description that corresponds to that in the credit or one that is expressed in general terms, to appear on any document (other than the invoice); whether failure to identify a discrepancy on one drawing precludes", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c); Articles 20 and 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R474", "PublishedID": "R474", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Are cited discrepancies justified if documents show minor differences in the name and addresses of the beneficiary, or differences in punctuation or in the writing of the vessel's name with a voyage number following it?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c), Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R475", "PublishedID": "R475", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Notice of transfer sent to the wrong address; impact on a transferee if a bank deducts amendment charges; whether description of the goods in the invoice corresponded to that in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 37(c);Article 48", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R476", "PublishedID": "R476", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the credit allowed for partial shipment, the beneficiary shipped less than the full quantity of goods, and the full amount was invoiced", "RelatedArticles": "Article 38", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R477", "PublishedID": "R477", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the shipment was, in fact, a partial shipment; whether a beneficiary is bound to make further shipments if the credit allows for partial shipments", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 40(a) and 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R478", "PublishedID": "R478", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Drafts to be drawn at sight; notation on B/L that goods are shipped on deck at shipper's/receiver's risk; whether shipment by truck with trailer constitutes partial shipment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 40(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R479", "PublishedID": "R479", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it necessary that a credit specifically state the words "instalment shipment" or "shipment schedule" for it to be subject to the provisions of Article 41?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 41", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R480", "PublishedID": "R480", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where documents were presented within the expiry date and within 10 days after the date of shipment; however, no mention was made of this fact within the covering schedule", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 44(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R481", "PublishedID": "R481", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "What is required to meet the conditions of sub-Article 44(c)?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 44(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R482", "PublishedID": "R482", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Several questions regarding the obligations and liabilities of a transferring bank", "RelatedArticles": "Article 48, sub-Article 48(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R483", "PublishedID": "R483", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When an issuing bank nominates a bank to transfer a credit, must that transferring bank also be a nominated bank for the handling and payment of documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R484", "PublishedID": "R484", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "The duty of the transferring bank towards the first and second beneficiaries after having received discrepant drafts and invoices, and having forwarded them to the issuing bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(c), 13(a) and 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R485", "PublishedID": "R485", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Several questions concerning the rights of the first and second beneficiaries vis-?is amendments and the transferring bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(d) and 9(d)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R486", "PublishedID": "R486", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Under Article 48 does a retransfer to the first beneficiary constitute a prohibited transfer?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(g); Article 48", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R487", "PublishedID": "R487", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "A transferable credit where terms and conditions were changed from the original L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(h)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R488", "PublishedID": "R488", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "When a letter of credit is transferred, what are the risks to the first beneficiary?; the details of the terms and conditions which may be altered when issuing a transferred credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(h) and 48(j)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R489", "PublishedID": "R489", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Is it a discrepancy if substituted documents by a first beneficiary under a transferable credit are not entirely consistent with earlier documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 48(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R490", "PublishedID": "R490", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a bank should advance funds when tested telex messages are ambiguous and unclear", "RelatedArticles": "Article 49", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R491", "PublishedID": "R491", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a bill of lading is endorsed by a company stamp", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R492", "PublishedID": "R492", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a clause in the credit indicates the credit is "inoperative" until cleared", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R493", "PublishedID": "R493", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Photocopied advices given to a beneficiary under a transferred credit", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R494", "PublishedID": "R494", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Cycles on a cumulative revolving L/C subject to an 'about' amount", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous; sub-Article 39(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R495", "PublishedID": "R495", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Resolving disputes between banks on reimbursement undertakings; where a checker comes across information which is either not correct or not possible; whether it is of consequence whether sea or freshwater ports are indicated", "RelatedArticles": "URR 525 Article 9; UCP 500 sub-Articles 13(a), 10(d), 23(a)(iii)(a) and (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R496", "PublishedID": "R496", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a COO submitted after the shipment date contradicted the expiry date of a credit", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 400, sub-Article 10(d)", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R497", "PublishedID": "R497", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a collecting bank acted in accordance with URC 522 when it released documents to the drawee without receiving payment and when it endorsed a B/L in favour of the drawee", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Articles 1 and 2", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R498", "PublishedID": "R498", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether the creation of a document by the drawee was authorized within the instructions given by the remitting bank", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-Articles 1(a), 2(a), 5(a), 10(a) and Article 8", "Rule": "URC 522, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R500", "PublishedID": "R500", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a collecting bank deducted an amount from the collection without seeking instructions from the remitting bank; whether an approval must be obtained for transport documents consigned to banks", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Article 2, sub-Article 19(b) and Article 10", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R501", "PublishedID": "R501", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "If documents are merely forwarded to the importer/buyer without due regard for the instructions contained within the collecting bank's covering schedule, are they in breach URC 522? Is there a requirement for the collecting bank to obtain the approval of", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-Articles 2(a), 3(a), 1(c), 5(a) and 5(f)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R502", "PublishedID": "R502", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Whether a guarantee was conditional or independent; whether complete and precise instructions were given in the documents presented for collection", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-Articles 4(a)(i) and 4(b)(vii)(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R503", "PublishedID": "R503", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where the release of documents was only to be effected at the time payment was made at maturity", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Article 6; sub-Articles 7(a) and 7(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2001 (118)", "Opinion": "R504", "PublishedID": "R504", "NonpublishedID": "", "Description": "Where a guarantee was issued under both URDG 458 and UCP 500, what is the reasonable time for processing said guarantee?", "RelatedArticles": "URDG Article 10; UCP sub-Articles 13(b) and 14(d)", "Rule": "URDG, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R505 / TA537", "PublishedID": "R505", "NonpublishedID": "TA537", "Description": "When a non-bank issues an L/C", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 1 and 2", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R506 / TA249", "PublishedID": "R506", "NonpublishedID": "TA249", "Description": "Whether branches of banks in the same country are considered to be the same bank; whether a mis-sent notice from a nominated bank to the issuing bank had any effect on the rights of the beneficiary to be paid under the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R507 / TA55rev", "PublishedID": "R507", "NonpublishedID": "TA55rev", "Description": "If a bank chooses to centralize its operations at one site, does this create a conflict with the Articles of UCP 500? If documents are presented to a branch office in one country, then sent to the head office in another, when does the "reasonable time" fo", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2; sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R508 / TA563", "PublishedID": "R508", "NonpublishedID": "TA563", "Description": "Whether under UCP there is a restriction on the number of applicants on whose behalf an L/C may be issued", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2; sub-Article 40(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R509 / TA58rev", "PublishedID": "R509", "NonpublishedID": "TA58rev", "Description": "Banks dealing with documents and not with goods; problems with the specifications of the goods ordered", "RelatedArticles": "Banks dealing with documents and not with goods; problems with the specifications of the goods ordered", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R510 / TA183", "PublishedID": "R510", "NonpublishedID": "TA183", "Description": "Banks, money laundering, fraud and the UCP; whether UCP is able to take cognizance of individual country or religious needs in relation to documentation or control of goods", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R511 / TA60", "PublishedID": "R511", "NonpublishedID": "TA60", "Description": "Reference in a credit to payment thereunder being linked to the payment being received under another credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 5(b) and 13(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R512 / TA49rev", "PublishedID": "R512", "NonpublishedID": "TA49rev", "Description": "Would an advice of acceptance reading "expected to mature on XXXX date" be acceptable?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 6", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R513 / TA121", "PublishedID": "R513", "NonpublishedID": "TA121", "Description": "Nature of the "non-operative" letter of credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 7(a); Article 12", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R514 / TA102", "PublishedID": "R514", "NonpublishedID": "TA102", "Description": "Where an irrevocable L/C is issued indicating that it is inoperative until a certain condition is met", "RelatedArticles": "Article 9", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R515 / TA227", "PublishedID": "R515", "NonpublishedID": "TA227", "Description": "Whether UCP or the local law rules in a dispute situation", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 9(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R516 / TA354", "PublishedID": "R516", "NonpublishedID": "TA354", "Description": "Whether a back-to-back L/C was irrevocable when it indicated that the issuing bank was to make payment "upon realization of the final proceeds" under another letter of credit issued in favour of its client", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 9(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R517 / TA169", "PublishedID": "R517", "NonpublishedID": "TA169", "Description": "If the credit required drafts to be drawn on the applicant, would they have been accepted by it [the applicant] and not by the issuing bank?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 9(a) and 9(a)(iv)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R518 / TA519rev", "PublishedID": "R518", "NonpublishedID": "TA519rev", "Description": "Questions concerning the right of a beneficiary to present, on its own choice, the documents to the issuing bank directly to be honoured at its counters, regardless of the fact that the credit restricted negotiation to a named nominated bank", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 9(a); Article 10; sub-Article 48(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R519 / TA556", "PublishedID": "R519", "NonpublishedID": "TA556", "Description": "If an L/C is freely available by negotiation, who should bear the consequences of an injunction order? By negotiating under a freely negotiable credit, does a negotiating bank become a holder in due course?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(a)(iv), 10(d) and Article 15", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R520 / TA543rev2", "PublishedID": "R520", "NonpublishedID": "TA543rev2", "Description": "When documents are presented with discrepancies to the confirming bank, when does the definitive undertaking of a confirming bank cease to exist?; When documents are sent to issuing bank on an approval basis and the discrepancies are waived, does the conf", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 9(b) [This Opinion supersedes Opinion R 14]", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R521 / TA538", "PublishedID": "R521", "NonpublishedID": "TA538", "Description": "Whether there was a confirmation under a letter of credit; the effect of a MT 799 SWIFT message confirming due date; deduction of fees and confirming bank's denial of confirmation subject to payment of fees", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 9(c)(i) and 9(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R522 / TA166", "PublishedID": "R522", "NonpublishedID": "TA166", "Description": "Several questions relating to the cancellation of irrevocable letters of credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 9(d), 9(d)(i), 9(d)(iii) and Article 15", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R523 / TA182", "PublishedID": "R523", "NonpublishedID": "TA182", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank is under an obligation to amend an L/C if asked by the applicant to do so", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 9(d)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R524 / TA45", "PublishedID": "R524", "NonpublishedID": "TA45", "Description": "Where the claiming bank failed to trace a lost tested telex and charged the reimbursing bank late interest", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 10(d); URR 525 Article 17", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R525 / TA10", "PublishedID": "R525", "NonpublishedID": "TA10", "Description": "What measures can a notifying bank take in a case where the text of a documentary credit received from a correspondent is incomprehensible (or illegible)?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 12", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R526 / TA553rev", "PublishedID": "R526", "NonpublishedID": "TA553rev", "Description": "Payment without presentation of the acceptance test certificate when the claim for payment fell after the period specified in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Article 12", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R527 / TA120", "PublishedID": "R527", "NonpublishedID": "TA120", "Description": "Where the consignee obtained the cargo against a bank guarantee; is the early release of documents contingent upon the beneficiary providing a conforming set of documents to the issuing bank?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R528 / TA480rev", "PublishedID": "R528", "NonpublishedID": "TA480rev", "Description": "Whether the issuing bank or the nominated bank (as the case may be) was entitled to refuse documents because the draft drawn on "the paying bank" was not correctly issued", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 13(a), 9(a) and 9(b)(iv); Article 9", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R529 / TA522", "PublishedID": "R529", "NonpublishedID": "TA522", "Description": "Implications of failure to provide a notice of refusal within a reasonable time, not to exceed seven banking days following the day of receipt of the documents; impact of a court order on the credit", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 13(a), 14(b), 14(e), 14(d)(i) and (ii), and 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R530 / TA238", "PublishedID": "R530", "NonpublishedID": "TA238", "Description": "Whether the words "such notice" in sub-Article 14(d)(ii) envision one advice and whether a subsequent rejection in a second notice is valid", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 13(a) and 14(d)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R531 / TA526", "PublishedID": "R531", "NonpublishedID": "TA526", "Description": "Can an endorsement on a bill of lading be completed in handwriting and/or must it be stamped? Can the consignor (shipper) be a party other than the beneficiary of the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 13(a) and 31(iii), Article 15", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R532 / TA576", "PublishedID": "R532", "NonpublishedID": "TA576", "Description": "Whether the insurance document covered the risks stated in the credit and whether an exclusion clause was directly linked to one of the risks to be covered; whether the transaction in question was the one contemplated in ISBP paragraph 186", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 13(a); Article 36; ISBP paragraph 186", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R533 / TA103", "PublishedID": "R533", "NonpublishedID": "TA103", "Description": "The necessity to authenticate corrections on documents in the case of transport documents, documents issued by the beneficiary and documents issued by someone other than the beneficiary", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 13(a), ISBP paragraphs 9 and 10", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R534 / TA54", "PublishedID": "R534", "NonpublishedID": "TA54", "Description": "The meaning of "reasonable time" in sub-Article 13(b); whether confirming banks have to wait seven days for reimbursement", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R535 / TA547", "PublishedID": "R535", "NonpublishedID": "TA547", "Description": "What is the right understanding of the terms "taking-up" of documents or "payment" as used in UCP 500?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R536 / TA192", "PublishedID": "R536", "NonpublishedID": "TA192", "Description": "Does a Saturday count as a "banking day" for the purposes of sub-Articles 13(b) and 14(d)(i) if the issuing bank is open on a Saturday?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 13(b) and 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R537 / TA77", "PublishedID": "R537", "NonpublishedID": "TA77", "Description": "The meaning of the expression "collection basis"", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R538 / TA530", "PublishedID": "R538", "NonpublishedID": "TA530", "Description": "Does effecting (two) partial payments imply that the confirming bank accepted the documents and as a consequence remains liable for the last partial payment? Does the confirming bank have the right to withdraw its liability as confirming bank, once two pa", "RelatedArticles": "Article 14, sub-Articles 9(b), 14(c), 14(d)(ii) and 14(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R539 / TA524", "PublishedID": "R539", "NonpublishedID": "TA524", "Description": "Steps a beneficiary should take when receiving a letter of credit which does not bear the confirmation of an advising or other nominated bank", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 14(b), 14(d)(i) and (ii), 14(d) and 9(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R540 / TA559", "PublishedID": "R540", "NonpublishedID": "TA559", "Description": "Whether an issuing bank can amend the conditions in sub-Article 14(d)(ii) to provide that the issuing bank has the right to release documents to the credit applicant prior to obtaining instructions from the presenting bank; effect of Article 1 in allowing", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 14(c)(d) and (e); Article 1", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R541 / TA545", "PublishedID": "R541", "NonpublishedID": "TA545", "Description": "Where the commercial invoice did not indicate delivery in a specific country; whether the terminology used in the refusal notice was in line with the requirements of sub-Article 14(d); when a bank rejects documents, can a party to the credit look to the b", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 14(d), 14(d)(ii) and 14(e); Articles 3 and 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R542 / TA106", "PublishedID": "R542", "NonpublishedID": "TA106", "Description": "What constitutes the day of receipt of the documents?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R543 / TA221", "PublishedID": "R543", "NonpublishedID": "TA221", "Description": "Where the issuing bank did not provide a notice of rejection within seven days", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R545 / TA345", "PublishedID": "R545", "NonpublishedID": "TA345", "Description": "Whether a rejection notice sent after banking hours on the seventh banking day was a valid rejection", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 14(d)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R546 / TA518rev", "PublishedID": "R546", "NonpublishedID": "TA518rev", "Description": "Implications of the failure by the issuing bank to hold documents at the disposal of the presenter; date from which a claim for interest would be calculated", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 14(d)(i)(ii) and (e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R547 / TA172", "PublishedID": "R547", "NonpublishedID": "TA172", "Description": "If the confirming bank presented documents indicating discrepancies therein, was the issuing bank still bound by the seven working days mentioned in sub-Article 14(d) to accept or reject the documents?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 14(d)(i) and 13(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R548 / TA566rev", "PublishedID": "R548", "NonpublishedID": "TA566rev", "Description": "Is the issuing bank obliged to honour a compliant presentation that had been negotiated by a nominated bank but lost in transit?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 16", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R549 / TA574", "PublishedID": "R549", "NonpublishedID": "TA574", "Description": "Are there remedies where banks impose conditions in their credits concerning fees, charges, costs, etc., issue non-operative credits and/or exclude certain UCP Articles?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 18(d), 19(d) and 19(e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R550 / TA119", "PublishedID": "R550", "NonpublishedID": "TA119", "Description": "Was the issuing bank responsible for any delay in reimbursement when it failed to provide payment on the basis of conforming documents or a notice of rejection as laid down in sub-Article 14(d)? Does UCP provide a means of calculating the interest owed?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 19; sub-Article 9(a) and 14(d)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R551 / TA105", "PublishedID": "R551", "NonpublishedID": "TA105", "Description": "Does UCP 500 require an original signature on bills of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R552 / TA555", "PublishedID": "R552", "NonpublishedID": "TA555", "Description": "Authentication of alterations on an insurance document with a company chop; evidence of an "all risks" clause or notation; a document completed in different type styles, font sizes or handwriting", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 20(b) and 35(b); Article 36; ISBP paragraphs 9, 186 and 11", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R553 / TA126rev", "PublishedID": "R553", "NonpublishedID": "TA126rev", "Description": "Where the credit requires a bill of lading issued to order and blank endorsed or to order of the issuing bank, can the certificate of origin show the ultimate receiver of the goods as the consignee?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R554 / TA247", "PublishedID": "R554", "NonpublishedID": "TA247", "Description": "Whether a certificate of origin must be issued by a chamber of commerce or attested by a government agency", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R555 / TA536", "PublishedID": "R555", "NonpublishedID": "TA536", "Description": "Were discrepancies valid indicating a consignee different from that on the B/L, a non-presentation of a document titled US Customs invoice, and a beneficiary's certificate not dated?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R556 / TA525", "PublishedID": "R556", "NonpublishedID": "TA525", "Description": "Whether there was information or text within the beneficiary's certificates that clearly linked them to the specific presentation under the credit; whether documents previously accepted and where a subsequent presentation has been rejected is covered by U", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R557 / TA516rev", "PublishedID": "R557", "NonpublishedID": "TA516rev", "Description": "Questions concerning the words "third party documents acceptable"", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21; sub-Article 31 (iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R558 / TA123", "PublishedID": "R558", "NonpublishedID": "TA123", "Description": "Determining the apparent conformity of a certificate of origin issued by a chamber of commerce", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21; sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R559 / TA548rev", "PublishedID": "R559", "NonpublishedID": "TA548rev", "Description": "Where one figure was not correct in a container number shown on the invoice; where some seal numbers in the packing list were not complete", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21, ISBP paragraph 24", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R560 / TA99", "PublishedID": "R560", "NonpublishedID": "TA99", "Description": "When delivery of the goods under the L/C was conditional on the production of another bill of lading and whether this restricted the ability of the receiver to take control of the goods on arrival of the vessel", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R561 / TA571", "PublishedID": "R561", "NonpublishedID": "TA571", "Description": "Whether paragraph 99 of ISBP suggests that a bill of lading is unacceptable due to the fact that it covers a consolidated (groupage) cargo", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23; ISBP paragraph 99", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R562 / TA572", "PublishedID": "R562", "NonpublishedID": "TA572", "Description": "Questions concerning bills of lading signed by forwarders", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23(a), 23(a)(i) and 26(a)(i); Articles 26 and 30", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R563 / TA540", "PublishedID": "R563", "NonpublishedID": "TA540", "Description": "Whether a bill of lading with the imprint of the name of the owner and the name of the carrying vessel on its front page signed by the master but without the express reference to the owner being the "carrier" complies with sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R564 / TA552", "PublishedID": "R564", "NonpublishedID": "TA552", "Description": "Does a requirement in the L/C that all required documents should be issued in English preclude a document being stamped in another language?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R565 / TA85", "PublishedID": "R565", "NonpublishedID": "TA85", "Description": "Whether it is necessary to insist on a separate signature for the loading on board notation; whether there is a difference between the words "laden" and "loaded" and whether the word "laden" makes the document "unclean"; whether is is necessary for a load", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 23(a)(i), 23(a)(ii), 32(c) and 32(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R566 / TA117", "PublishedID": "R566", "NonpublishedID": "TA117", "Description": "Where a marine or ocean bill of lading is signed as agent of a name carrier, is it necessary for the carrier to be identified elsewhere in the document?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(i); ICC Position Paper no. 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R567 / TA219", "PublishedID": "R567", "NonpublishedID": "TA219", "Description": "Questions regarding the signature of the agent and/or carrier on the bill of lading and the words "the name of the carrier is missing"", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(i); ICC Position Paper no. 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R568 / GE64", "PublishedID": "R568", "NonpublishedID": "GE64", "Description": "Whether the date of an on board notation, if any, should be considered the "B/L date" irrespective of whether the date of the on board notation is later or earlier than the date of issuance of the bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R569 / TA171", "PublishedID": "R569", "NonpublishedID": "TA171", "Description": "An on board notation in different typefaces; the difference, if any, between "for the Master" and "for & on behalf of the Master"", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R570 / TA312", "PublishedID": "R570", "NonpublishedID": "TA312", "Description": "Where a bill of lading showed two vessels and one port of loading", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R571 / TA360", "PublishedID": "R571", "NonpublishedID": "TA360", "Description": "Whether a charter party B/L could show the port of loading as "Chinese Port"; whether it was necessary to add the date after the words "clean on board" on a pre-printed on board B/L", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R572 / TA465", "PublishedID": "R572", "NonpublishedID": "TA465", "Description": "Where a pre-printed "shipped on board" bill of lading is presented which also bears a shipped on board notation with a date different from the date of issuance", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 23(a)(ii), 24(a)(ii) and 25(a)(iv)[This Opinion supersedes Opinion R 284]", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R573 / TA93", "PublishedID": "R573", "NonpublishedID": "TA93", "Description": "Where a credit allowed shipment to a choice of ports, was the bill of lading acceptable?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 23(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R574 / TA195", "PublishedID": "R574", "NonpublishedID": "TA195", "Description": "Questions from SWIFT concerning the way transport details are specified in SWIFT standards", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 23(a)(iii), 24(a)(iii) and 26(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R575 / TA558", "PublishedID": "R575", "NonpublishedID": "TA558", "Description": "Whether reference to specific clauses, by number or otherwise, within the terms and conditions listed on the reverse of a bill of lading compels the bank to review such clauses to establish compliance of the document with the credit terms and conditions", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 23(a)(v) and 13(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R576 / TA520rev", "PublishedID": "R576", "NonpublishedID": "TA520rev", "Description": "When B/Ls are printed via the Internet and the placing of terms and conditions on the B/L", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 23(a)(v), Article 23,Sub-Article 20(b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R577 / TA560rev", "PublishedID": "R577", "NonpublishedID": "TA560rev", "Description": "Whether the terms "charter party B/L acceptable" and "short form B/L not acceptable" constituted an inconsistency", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 23(a)(v), 24(a)(v) and 26(a)(v)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R578 / TA567rev", "PublishedID": "R578", "NonpublishedID": "TA567rev", "Description": "Several claimed discrepancies with regard to tanker bills of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Article 25; sub-Articles 14(d)(ii), 14(e), 25(a)(iii) and 25(a)(i); ISBP paragraphs 107, 106, 100 and 101", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R579 / TA539", "PublishedID": "R579", "NonpublishedID": "TA539", "Description": "Whether an on board notation or evidence of payment of freight is considered to be information furnished or declared by the shipper", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Article 31(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R580 / TA550", "PublishedID": "R580", "NonpublishedID": "TA550", "Description": "Can an insurance certificate be signed "by proxy"?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 34; ISBP paragraph 185", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R581 / TA111", "PublishedID": "R581", "NonpublishedID": "TA111", "Description": "Where a credit does not specify a percentage, fixed amount or maximum amount for insurance cover, can the insurance document be expressed for any amount above the minimum of 110 per cent of the gross CIF or CIP value?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 34(f)(ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R582 / TA577", "PublishedID": "R582", "NonpublishedID": "TA577", "Description": "Where the insurance clauses are stated in the insurance document exactly as required in the credit, but the exclusion clause does not form part of that insurance clause", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 35(b); ISBP paragraph 186", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R583 / TA200", "PublishedID": "R583", "NonpublishedID": "TA200", "Description": "Whether the specifications of the goods in the invoice corresponded to those in the credit terms", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 37(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R584 / TA564rev", "PublishedID": "R584", "NonpublishedID": "TA564rev", "Description": "Whether the description of the goods in the credit corresponded with the description in the commercial invoice", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 37(c); ISBP paragraphs 62 and 63", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R585 / TA515", "PublishedID": "R585", "NonpublishedID": "TA515", "Description": "Where an L/C stipulated that negotiation must be effected seven days after the shipping date", "RelatedArticles": "Article 42", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R586 / TA397", "PublishedID": "R586", "NonpublishedID": "TA397", "Description": "Whether a rejection on the grounds of credit expired and late presentation was valid; whether an invoice that specified the price gross for net would be acceptable", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 42 and 43", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R587 / TA399", "PublishedID": "R587", "NonpublishedID": "TA399", "Description": "Was the advising bank correct in transferring a credit on an unconfirmed basis?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-Articles 48(h) and 48(c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R588 / TA109", "PublishedID": "R588", "NonpublishedID": "TA109", "Description": "Whether a CMR which includes the reference number of the second beneficiary's invoice rather than that of the (substituted) first beneficiary's invoice is a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 48(i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R589 / TA25", "PublishedID": "R589", "NonpublishedID": "TA25", "Description": "Is there a remedy under UCP 500 when a carrier issues a bill of lading evidencing shipment of three containers, when in fact only two were on board?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R590 / TA52rev", "PublishedID": "R590", "NonpublishedID": "TA52rev", "Description": "The role of UCP adherence lists", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R591 / TA83", "PublishedID": "R591", "NonpublishedID": "TA83", "Description": "Where the credit required the marine bill of lading or charter party bill of lading to be issued to order of the applicant and also requested that 2/3 originals be sent directly to the applicant", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R592 / TA531", "PublishedID": "R592", "NonpublishedID": "TA531", "Description": "Whether a sight draft requires an endorsement by the beneficiary; whether documents handled by another nominated bank require forwarding of the original credit and attachments to the confirming bank; whether the presentation of a corrected certificate sho", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R593 / TA554", "PublishedID": "R593", "NonpublishedID": "TA554", "Description": "Where bills of lading were not blank endorsed by the beneficiary", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R594 / TA549rev", "PublishedID": "R594", "NonpublishedID": "TA549rev", "Description": "Where a B/L only mentions "Alexandria" in the Port of Discharge box, but the L/C stipulates transport to "Alexandria Port (Free Zone)"", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous, ISBP paragraph 82", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R595 / TA380", "PublishedID": "R595", "NonpublishedID": "TA380", "Description": "In an advance payment guarantee, whether the guarantor, in addition to a statement of default, was entitled to request the production of the document required in the guarantee, with a statement from the beneficiary in the specific wording demanded", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R596 / TA561rev", "PublishedID": "R596", "NonpublishedID": "TA561rev", "Description": "Several questions concerning electronic records, air transport documents, date of the notation and date of presentation under eUCP", "RelatedArticles": "Articles e10, e9, e11 and e5(f); UCP Article 27(a)(iii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R597 / TA101", "PublishedID": "R597", "NonpublishedID": "TA101", "Description": "The date of a reimbursement claim; a reimbursement claim received with a request for back value; giving of value under negotiation-type credits", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 11(b) and 11(a)(i); UCP 500 sub-Article 19(d)", "Rule": "URR 525", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R598 / TA439", "PublishedID": "R598", "NonpublishedID": "TA439", "Description": "Whether a correction on a phytosanitary certificate was acceptable", "RelatedArticles": "paragraph 9", "Rule": "ISBP", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R599 / TA562rev", "PublishedID": "R599", "NonpublishedID": "TA562rev", "Description": "Whether the ISBP is binding in the same manner as the UCP; whether a round chop bearing the company name is impermissible for making corrections and alterations; whether merchandise not called for in the credit should be shipped and/or shown on the docume", "RelatedArticles": "paragraphs 9. 10, 41 and 68", "Rule": "ISBP", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R601 / TA521", "PublishedID": "R601", "NonpublishedID": "TA521", "Description": "When a bank has confirmed a letter of credit which contained a split payment structure, does this bind that bank to effecting settlement if the conditions of payment for the final payment were not met?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 3 and 4; sub-Article 10(b)", "Rule": "UCP 400", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R602 / TA32", "PublishedID": "R602", "NonpublishedID": "TA32", "Description": "The meaning of the term "direct pay"; whether a remitting bank cannot impose upon a collecting bank any requirement to act in whole or in part for any instructions contained in the collection schedule", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1, sub-Article 1(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R605 / TA542", "PublishedID": "R605", "NonpublishedID": "TA542", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank was responsible for mishandling collections by not complying with the above mentioned sub-Articles and a special instruction in capital letters", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 1(b) and (c) , sub-Article 4 (b)(iii) and Article 7", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R607 / TA141", "PublishedID": "R607", "NonpublishedID": "TA141", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank complied with the provisions of URC 522 sub-Article 1(c) if there was doubt as to the requirements and instructions of the remitting bank; whether banks may impose upon a collecting bank a form of guarantee of payment more akin", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 1(c), 4(a)(i) and 4(b)(vii)(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R609 / TA179", "PublishedID": "R609", "NonpublishedID": "TA179", "Description": "After the documents are released and an advice of acceptance has been sent, does the presenting bank have any further obligations? Whether the fact that the transport documents were issued to the order of the presenting bank makes that bank liable under U", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 2(a)(1)(2)(3) and Article 6", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R612 / TA551rev", "PublishedID": "R612", "NonpublishedID": "TA551rev", "Description": "Where the collecting bank released documents against partial payment not authorized in the collection instructions and delayed before sending the collection and the partial payment", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 2(a), 19(b), 26(c)(1) and 26(c)(3)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R613 / TA565", "PublishedID": "R613", "NonpublishedID": "TA565", "Description": "A statement appended by the collecting bank indicating that the bank is not responsible for the payment of the draft at maturity", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 2(a), Article 22 and sub-Article 26(c)(2)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R614 / TA546", "PublishedID": "R614", "NonpublishedID": "TA546", "Description": "Where a full name and address of a bank has been provided by the exporter, can the remitting bank take such instructions on their face value or is it required to check the correctness of the address?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 4 and 14", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R618 / TA107", "PublishedID": "R618", "NonpublishedID": "TA107", "Description": "Use of the word "banks" in URC 522 sub-Article 21(d); if the drawee is someone other than presenting bank, whether the presenting bank has an obligation towards the drawer as regard payment at maturity; where the presenting bank is requested to "aval" the", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 21(d)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R619 / TA155", "PublishedID": "R619", "NonpublishedID": "TA155", "Description": "Questions concerning protest and protest charges under a collection", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 24 and 21; sub-Article 21(d)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R620 / TA579", "PublishedID": "R620", "NonpublishedID": "TA579", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank provided, without delay, an advice of payment or non-payment; whether an advice from the collecting bank that it had collected the local currency equivalent of US dollars from the importer satisfied the terms of the collection", "RelatedArticles": "Article 12 and sub-Articles 20(iii)(a) and (c)", "Rule": "URC 322", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R621 / TA454rev", "PublishedID": "R621", "NonpublishedID": "TA454rev", "Description": "Where the guarantee required a written statement which did not require specific mention of the contract number or date, would the absence of this information except in the introduction be a cause for not honouring the guarantee?", "RelatedArticles": "1-29; sub-Articles 20(a)(i) and 20(b)", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R622 / TA361rev2", "PublishedID": "R622", "NonpublishedID": "TA361rev2", "Description": "Where the guarantee required a written statement which did not require specific mention of the contract number or date, would the absence of this information except in the introduction be a cause for not honouring the guarantee?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 2(a), 10(a), 10(b) and Article 9", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R623 / TA570", "PublishedID": "R623", "NonpublishedID": "TA570", "Description": "Whether the word "written" in the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG) includes a fax or e-mail and whether it is necessary for the fax to be signed by the sender or the e-mail to be electronically signed", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Article 2(d)", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "1995-2004 (109)", "Opinion": "R625 / TA568rev", "PublishedID": "R625", "NonpublishedID": "TA568rev", "Description": "Provisions in the guarantee or the counter-guarantee to the effect of undertaking to make payment under a demand guarantee despite court orders", "RelatedArticles": "Article 20", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R626 / TA652rev", "PublishedID": "R626", "NonpublishedID": "TA652rev", "Description": "Where an L/C called for a certificate of origin from a local chamber of commerce", "RelatedArticles": "Article 3", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R603 / TA472rev", "PublishedID": "R603", "NonpublishedID": "TA472rev", "Description": "Whether in a collection payable at sight, the collecting bank, by releasing documents to the drawee without receiving payment, acted outside the authority and instructions given by the remitting bank.", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Article 1, Article 2", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R604 / TA135", "PublishedID": "R604", "NonpublishedID": "TA135", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank was absolved of its responsibilities under collection instruments if the documents were stolen and used in taking delivery of the goods.", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 Articles 1, 9 and 26", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R606 / TA162rev", "PublishedID": "R606", "NonpublishedID": "TA162rev", "Description": "Whether the presenting bank was properly elected; whether documents should have been listed when transferred to a presenting bank; remedy when the shipping company released the cargo against one original (of two sets of documents for which the collection represented) and when one of the original B/Ls was not properly endorsed by the presenting bank.", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 1(c), 1(f), 11(b) and 12(a)", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R608 / TA476", "PublishedID": "R608", "NonpublishedID": "TA476", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank was correct in making payment for a lesser amount than in the collection instructions; whether with regard to transport documents consigned to banks, an approval must be obtained in respect of each consignment.", "RelatedArticles": "Article 2, sub-Article 19(b) and Article 10", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R610 / TA205", "PublishedID": "R610", "NonpublishedID": "TA205", "Description": "Collecting bank's duties to comply with the instructions received from the remitting bank without reference to any previous transactions; whether a collecting bank can handle a collection based upon what it considers to have been the exporter's instructions or wishes; remedies if the remitting bank has failed to convey the correct instructions of the exporter.", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 2(a) and 2(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R611 / TA338", "PublishedID": "R611", "NonpublishedID": "TA338", "Description": "When the documents were forwarded to the importer/buyer without due regard for the instructions contained within the collecting bank's covering schedule; is there a requirement for the collecting bank to obtain the approval of the presenting bank before sending a collection instruction?", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 2(a), 2(b), 3(a), 3(b), 1(c) and 5(f)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R615 / TA463", "PublishedID": "R615", "NonpublishedID": "TA463", "Description": "Whether a guarantee was independent or conditional; the role of collecting banks with regard to collection instructions received and their subsequent amendments, and whether such banks are concerned with the underlying intention of the parties and the presenting bank.", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 4(a)(i) and 4(b)(vii)(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R616 / TA291", "PublishedID": "R616", "NonpublishedID": "TA291", "Description": "Where a bill of exchange is drawn '60 days from bill of lading date' or similar, does this refer to calendar days or working days? Use of the words 'hold for collection at maturity'.", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 4(a)(i) and 4(b)(vii)(b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R617 / TA135", "PublishedID": "R617", "NonpublishedID": "TA135", "Description": "Whether the collecting bank complied with the instructions contained in the collection instruction, which required the acceptance of the bill of exchange that accompanied the other shipping documents; whether the creation of a document by the drawee was authorized within the instructions given by the remitting bank.", "RelatedArticles": "sub-Articles 5(c), 1(a), 2(a). 5(a) and 10(a); Articles 5 and 8 ", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R627 / TA640", "PublishedID": "R627", "NonpublishedID": "TA640", "Description": "When a signature, mark, stamp or label is placed on a document, is the L/C complying even if the document states “legalized” instead of “certified”?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 3 and UCP 500 sub-article 20 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R628/ TA661rev", "PublishedID": "R628", "NonpublishedID": "TA661rev", "Description": "Preparation of drafts for drawing under a documentary credit available with any bank or a particular nominated bank by acceptance", "RelatedArticles": "Article 6", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R629 / TA672rev", "PublishedID": "R629", "NonpublishedID": "TA672rev", "Description": "Does a prepaying nominated bank have independent reimbursement claim against an issuing bank in accordance with sub-article 7 (c) of UCP 600 as a consequence of the authorization given to a nominated bank under sub-article 12 (b) even if a court order iss", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 12 (b), 7 (c) and 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R630 / TA655rev", "PublishedID": "R630", "NonpublishedID": "TA655rev", "Description": "Whether wording used in a message of a nominated bank indicating that documents were “accepted by us” reflects that the bank has incurred its deferred payment undertaking", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 12 (b) and 12 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R631 / TA644rev", "PublishedID": "R631", "NonpublishedID": "TA644rev", "Description": "Does a credit containing reference to a latest shipment date without stipulating the requirement for presentation of a document indicating compliance with this condition automatically constitute a non-documentary condition and is it necessary to check thi", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 14 (d) and 14 (h)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R632 / TA657rev", "PublishedID": "R632", "NonpublishedID": "TA657rev", "Description": "Where a CMR named two carriers for the same routing and goods; whether the insertion of the actual date of receipt by pen required authentication by the carrier or its agent", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 14 (d), 24 (a) (i) and 24 (a) (ii); ISBP 681 paragraphs 9 and 11", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R633/ TA663rev", "PublishedID": "R633", "NonpublishedID": "TA663rev", "Description": "Must issues concerning certification of findings come from the party who issues the respective certificate?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R634 / TA638rev", "PublishedID": "R634", "NonpublishedID": "TA638rev", "Description": "When L/Cs exclude UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (l), 28 (h) and (i), 16 (c) (iii) (d), 14(f) and (k); whether a presentation not impacted by an as yet unaccepted amendment constitutes acceptance of the amendment by the beneficiary", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 14 (l), 28 (h) and (i), 16 (c) (iii) (d), 14(f) and (k) and 10(c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R635 / TA658", "PublishedID": "R635", "NonpublishedID": "TA658", "Description": "Whether the misquoting of the credit number on a bill of lading was a reason for refusal; when a refusal is sent to a nominated bank or a beneficiary and it provides a replacement or corrected document, does this, in itself, signify the nominated bank’s a", "RelatedArticles": "Article 16; miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R636 / TA668rev", "PublishedID": "R636", "NonpublishedID": "TA668rev", "Description": "When a courier receipt was requested and was received but not signed, was the document discrepant when there was no signature space included on the document?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 17 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R637 / TA654rev", "PublishedID": "R637", "NonpublishedID": "TA654rev", "Description": "Whether there was a conflict with only one pro forma invoice number being quoted on documents other than the commercial invoice; whether a notify party field with just the name of the applicant created a discrepancy; whether a courier company receipt not", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 18 (c) and 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R638 / TA629", "PublishedID": "R638", "NonpublishedID": "TA629", "Description": "When multimodal transport has occurred, is a transport document marked “received for shipment” and dated as of that date acceptable? Was a documentary credit discrepant because of the ambiguity that allowed a document covering at least two different modes", "RelatedArticles": "Article 19", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R639 / TA651rev", "PublishedID": "R639", "NonpublishedID": "TA651rev", "Description": "When a credit requires or allows the presentation of a “house” bill of lading or air waybill, what are the requirements for signing, compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit and the respective transport article, particularly with regard to f", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 19-23, sub-articles 14 (f) and 14 (l); ISBP 681 paragraphs 72, 95 and 138", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R640 / TA641", "PublishedID": "R640", "NonpublishedID": "TA641", "Description": "In the context of a forwarding agent’s goods receipt, is there a requirement for the document to evidence a place of delivery?", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 19-25; sub-articles 14 (f) and 14 (h); ISBP 681 paragraph 19", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R641 / TA650rev", "PublishedID": "R641", "NonpublishedID": "TA650rev", "Description": "Cases in which a dated on board notation is required to appear on a multimodal or combined transport document", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 19 (a) (ii) and (iii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R642 / TA666rev", "PublishedID": "R642", "NonpublishedID": "TA666rev", "Description": "Whether a dated on board notation is required when a MMTD evidences the first leg of the carriage as a sea shipment from the port stated in the credit, i.e., whether there is a need for evidence of the date the goods were shipped on board by means of pre-", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 19 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R643 / TA669rev", "PublishedID": "R643", "NonpublishedID": "TA669rev", "Description": "If a transport document states “freight forwarder bills of lading are not acceptable” or “house bills of lading not acceptable”, can the freight forwarder or agent sign the bill of lading according to the requirements expressed in sub-article 20 (a) (i)?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 20 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R644 / TA665rev", "PublishedID": "R644", "NonpublishedID": "TA665rev", "Description": "If there is a place of receipt shown on the bill of lading and it is different from the port of loading stated in the credit, is there a need for a separate on board notation? If the place of receipt is the same as that of the port of loading stated in th", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 20 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R645 / TA667rev", "PublishedID": "R645", "NonpublishedID": "TA667rev", "Description": "Whether a bill of lading will be discrepant unless it is evident that the shipped on board statement applies to the named vessel and the port of loading stated in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 20 (a) (ii) and (iii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R646 / TA642rev", "PublishedID": "R646", "NonpublishedID": "TA642rev", "Description": "Where a credit required presentation of a bill of lading marked “freight prepaid” but contained pre-printed wording that qualified any notation of “freight prepaid”", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 20 (a) (v)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R647 / TA662rev", "PublishedID": "R647", "NonpublishedID": "TA662rev", "Description": "Whether three documents should be treated as charter party bills of lading", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 22 and 20; sub-articles 22(a) and 20 (a) (iv)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R648 / TA635rev", "PublishedID": "R648", "NonpublishedID": "TA635rev", "Description": "Whether a B/L marked “Congenbill” can always be considered as a charter party B/L; whether a bank can decide if a presentation is allowed to be made outside the banking hours of its trade department; when a place of receipt or taking in charge is the same", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 22 (a) and 20 (a) (ii); articles 33 and 20", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R649 / TA 656", "PublishedID": "R649", "NonpublishedID": "TA656", "Description": "Whether an international consignment note needed to bear wording or a marking indicating “copy for shipper”", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 24 (b) (i); UCP 500 article 28", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R650 / TA671", "PublishedID": "R650", "NonpublishedID": "TA671", "Description": "Whether a qualification as to the number of shipments to be made can be stated anywhere on the credit and not just in fields 43P or 47A", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 31 (a) and article 1", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R651 / TA639rev", "PublishedID": "R651", "NonpublishedID": "TA639rev", "Description": "Where an issuing bank requires the nominated bank to send copies of all documents under the L/C to satisfy the rule in article 35 should the original documents be lost in transit; where there are fees charged for additional sets of documents; when an orig", "RelatedArticles": "Article 35; sub-articles 38 (d) and (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R652 / TA653", "PublishedID": "R652", "NonpublishedID": "TA653", "Description": "Can a first beneficiary substitute its combined certificate of value and of origin for that of a second beneficiary?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 38 (h)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R653 / TA632rev", "PublishedID": "R653", "NonpublishedID": "TA632rev", "Description": "Can a transferring bank be protected by UCP 600 when it excludes the applicability of sub-article 38 (k) in case of a 100% transfer and if no substitution of documents is to occur?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 38 (k), (e), (h) and (j)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R654 / TA647rev", "PublishedID": "R654", "NonpublishedID": "TA647rev", "Description": "Whether the requirement “all documents should be issued in English” applies to the language in which data on a document is completed, and/or also to the pre-printed form of a CMR", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R655 / TA631rev", "PublishedID": "R655", "NonpublishedID": "TA631rev", "Description": "When a bank had outsourced the handling of all or part of the documentary credit processing to another bank", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R656 / TA659rev", "PublishedID": "R656", "NonpublishedID": "TA659rev", "Description": "Should the issuing bank clearly indicate the amount or percentage of charges that it will deduct, even if the L/C stipulates that all charges outside the country of the issuing bank are for the beneficiary’s account and are to be deducted from the proceed", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R657 / TA670", "PublishedID": "R657", "NonpublishedID": "TA670", "Description": "When a credit requires a “vessel certificate issued by shipping company or their agents”, would a “vessel certificate” issued by either “the carrier” or “the agent for the carrier” be acceptable?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R658 / TA664rev", "PublishedID": "R658", "NonpublishedID": "TA664rev", "Description": "Were the authentications of corrections on an invoice, a bill of lading and an insurance document sufficient?", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 9", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R659 / TA634rev", "PublishedID": "R659", "NonpublishedID": "TA634rev", "Description": "Whether a document was discrepant because it did not contain a date of issuance and whether the shipped on board date would constitute the date of the bill of lading for the purpose of ISBP publication 681 paragraph 13.", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 13", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R660 / TA636rev", "PublishedID": "R660", "NonpublishedID": "TA636rev", "Description": "Whether IATA two-letter air carrier codes can be used on an AWB to identify the carrier; whether a combined transport document can be used when the document states that the goods may be shipped by sea OR air; whether a transport document can be signed “As", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 141; UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (i)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R661 / TA608rev1", "PublishedID": "R661", "NonpublishedID": "TA608rev1", "Description": "A series of claimed discrepancies concerning language on packing lists, proforma invoices, tanker and combined transport B/Ls, CMRs and air waybills", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 3(a) and 5(b); articles 23 and 25; sub-article 26(a)(ii), articles 14, 28 and 27", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R662 / TA630rev", "PublishedID": "R662", "NonpublishedID": "TA630rev", "Description": "Whether having given its advice of acceptance, based on a complying presentation being made, an issuing bank can later refuse to honour based on issues relating to the quality of the goods", "RelatedArticles": "Article 4 and sub-article 9 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R663 / TA613", "PublishedID": "R663", "NonpublishedID": "TA613", "Description": "Will “partial negotiation” be recognized as negotiation under the UCP? Will the negotiating bank’s right of recourse against the L/C beneficiary affect its negotiating bank status?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 10 (b) (ii) and 10 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R664 / TA592", "PublishedID": "R664", "NonpublishedID": "TA592", "Description": "Whether the balance available under a credit was reduced by the value of a presentation that was refused", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 13 and 14; sub-articles 14 (c) and (i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R665 / TA649rev", "PublishedID": "R665", "NonpublishedID": "TA649rev", "Description": "Where a credit required a certificate of origin “approved” by the “Arab League Chamber of Commerce”; whether a notice of refusal was sent within seven days after receiving the documents", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 13 and 14; sub-articles 14 (d) (i) and (ii); 14 (e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R666 / TA569", "PublishedID": "R666", "NonpublishedID": "TA569", "Description": "Nomination of the bank authorized to negotiate; effect of a negotiating bank claiming reimbursement from a reimbursing bank; whether a negotiating bank claiming reimbursement and holding funds until the issuing bank either confirmed that documents comply", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 13 and 14, sub-article 19(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R667 / TA609", "PublishedID": "R667", "NonpublishedID": "TA609", "Description": "Where a bank refused to honour because a photocopy of the CMR was presented as opposed to the original and because information critical to the review of the document under the credit terms was illegible", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 13 (a), 14 (b), 14 (d) (i) and (d) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R668 / TA594", "PublishedID": "R668", "NonpublishedID": "TA594", "Description": "Whether different titles of a document constitute a discrepancy; whether banks are responsible for interpreting the meaning of a company stamp", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 13 (a), article 21 and ISBP paragraph 43", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R669 / TA593rev", "PublishedID": "R669", "NonpublishedID": "TA593rev", "Description": "Where documents were forwarded to the issuing bank on the basis that they be considered additional to the L/C requirements, but where no reference to this effect was made in the covering schedule of the negotiating bank.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 13 (a) and 37 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R670 / TA581rev", "PublishedID": "R670", "NonpublishedID": "TA581rev", "Description": "Where multiple presentations are made on the same day under the same L/C; where more than one complete presentation of documents is made under one cover letter or schedule for the full amount of all the presentations; whether a distinction is made in any", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 14 (b), article 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R671 / TA580rev", "PublishedID": "R671", "NonpublishedID": "TA580rev", "Description": "Releasing of cargo consigned to the order of issuing bank without payment of the bills presented under the documentary credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 14 (d) and 14 (e); URC 522 sub-article 10 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R672 / TA605rev", "PublishedID": "R672", "NonpublishedID": "TA605rev", "Description": "Whether the advices of refusal sufficiently stated all discrepancies in respect of which the bank refused the documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 14 (d) (ii) and 14 (e)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R673 / TA611", "PublishedID": "R673", "NonpublishedID": "TA611", "Description": "Whether a certificate of origin signed in various ways by a chamber of commerce is correct", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 20 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R674 / TA625rev2", "PublishedID": "R674", "NonpublishedID": "TA625rev2", "Description": "Where a party signed in its own name as agent for a carrier of the same name was this a discrepancy?", "RelatedArticles": "Article 23, sub-article 23 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R675 / TA596", "PublishedID": "R675", "NonpublishedID": "TA596", "Description": "Whether, in two different cases, the on board notation required the name of the vessel and the date the goods were loaded on board", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 23 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R676 / TA614", "PublishedID": "R676", "NonpublishedID": "TA614", "Description": "Whether a bill of lading has to indicate the name of the vessel onto which the goods will be transhipped; where the confirming bank’s undertaking was conditional on the receipt of compliant documents", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 23 (a) (ii) and 9 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R677 / TA617rev", "PublishedID": "R677", "NonpublishedID": "TA617rev", "Description": "Whether a charter party bill of lading containing an indication of the quantity and/or weight and/or measurement of goods, but bearing a statement (usually pre-printed on the charter party bill of lading) “Quality, Quantity, Measurements unknown” or simil", "RelatedArticles": "Article 25", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R678 / TA622rev", "PublishedID": "R678", "NonpublishedID": "TA622rev", "Description": "When a bill of lading shows “loading on board” by pre-printed wording without an on board date, and the bill of lading issuing date is after the date the period of loading is completed, is there a discrepancy?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 25 (a) (iv)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R679 / TA610", "PublishedID": "R679", "NonpublishedID": "TA610", "Description": "Whether a multimodal transport document had to indicate a place of delivery; whether the insurance document had to cover the entire journey between the place of receipt and the place of delivery; whether a general packing list would serve instead of a pac", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 26 (a) (iii); ISBP 645 paragraph 188", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R680 / TA584", "PublishedID": "R680", "NonpublishedID": "TA584", "Description": "Whether an air waybill evidenced that it had been signed by the carrier or his agent and was therefore discrepant.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 27(a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R681 / TA621", "PublishedID": "R681", "NonpublishedID": "TA621", "Description": "Whether a document was discrepant when the credit called for a master air waybill and the air waybill presented was issued by an IATA agent as an agent for the carrier", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 27 (a), articles 27 and 30", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R682 / TA601", "PublishedID": "R682", "NonpublishedID": "TA601", "Description": "Whether the absence of an indication that a signature was that of a carrier and with no indication of the name and the capacity of a party signing a CMR was a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "Article 28", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R683 / TA627rev", "PublishedID": "R683", "NonpublishedID": "TA627rev", "Description": "Whether removal of reference to CMR transport document in the L/C and inclusion of CMR on the transport document constituted a discrepancy; where discrepancies were stated in two notices of refusal", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 28 (a) and 14 (d) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R684 / TA597", "PublishedID": "R684", "NonpublishedID": "TA597", "Description": "Whether a CMR contained a reception stamp and whether it was discrepant for late shipment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 28 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R685 / TA591", "PublishedID": "R685", "NonpublishedID": "TA591", "Description": "Are the requirements for the signing of the insurance documents similar to those of transport documents?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 34 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R686 / TA589", "PublishedID": "R686", "NonpublishedID": "TA589", "Description": "Whether a terrorism exclusion clause is valid under UCP", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 35 (a); ISBP 645 paragraph 186", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R687 / TA646rev", "PublishedID": "R687", "NonpublishedID": "TA646rev", "Description": "The effect of a change in expression of title of the beneficiary as opposed to an actual change of name of the beneficiary under various ICC rules and whether standby letters of credit have to be amended to indicate the change", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 37 (a), 13 (a) and article 2; ISBP 645 paragraph 24; UCP 600 article 2 and sub-articles 14 (d) and 18 (a); ISP98 rules 1.09 and 4.01 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R688 / TA619", "PublishedID": "R688", "NonpublishedID": "TA619", "Description": "Is the allowance in the overall amount and total quantity also applicable to partial quantities? Should payment under a credit be restricted to the presentation of documents from the applicant or include blocking clauses?", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 39 (a) and 14 (d) (i)and (ii); ISBP 645 paragraph 4", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R689 / TA618", "PublishedID": "R689", "NonpublishedID": "TA618", "Description": "Whether field 39A of the SWIFT MT700 has an effect on the amount that can be drawn under the credit", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 39 (b) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R690 / TA633", "PublishedID": "R690", "NonpublishedID": "TA633", "Description": "Where partial shipments were allowed, was there a need to dispatch the required quantities in a single dispatch prior to a certain date? When a document fulfilled the conditions of the credit and the applicable provisions of article 28, did the document c", "RelatedArticles": "Article 41 and sub-article 28 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R691 / TA604rev", "PublishedID": "R691", "NonpublishedID": "TA604rev", "Description": "Several claimed discrepancies concerning a credit available by negotiation, including questions arising when a replacement interest invoice and draft were presented to the confirming bank within the validity of the credit but not within 21 days after the", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 43, 21, 20 and 37; sub-articles 23(a)(ii) and 43(a); ISBP 645 paragraph 79; ICC Decision on Original Documents", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R692 / TA603", "PublishedID": "R692", "NonpublishedID": "TA603", "Description": "Whether sub-article 43 (a), which refers to the presentation of documents and calls for transport documents to be presented within 21 days after the date of shipment, applied to an interest invoice and draft", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 43 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R693 / TA582rev", "PublishedID": "R693", "NonpublishedID": "TA582rev", "Description": "Whether the establishment of what is a transport document, and therefore identification therefrom of the date of shipment, is clearly linked in the UCP to an original transport document being presented", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-article 43 (a); article 23; sub-articles 23 (a) (ii) and 23 (a) (iv)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R694 / TA602rev", "PublishedID": "R694", "NonpublishedID": "TA602rev", "Description": "The release of documents to the applicant without full settlement being received and the role the bank played in its dealings with the issuing bank regarding the settlement for the documents received and effecting such settlement for a reduced amount with", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 48 (a), 9 (a), 14 (a), (b), (d)(i) and (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R695 / TA615rev", "PublishedID": "R695", "NonpublishedID": "TA615rev", "Description": "Whether the addition of “Incoterms 2000” on an invoice made the document discrepant", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R696 / TA583rev", "PublishedID": "R696", "NonpublishedID": "TA583rev", "Description": "Whether the beneficiary’s statement and the courier receipt formed part of the same documentary requirement and if either the statement and the courier receipt or the statement alone could indicate the credit number as requested by the issuing bank", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R697 / TA645rev", "PublishedID": "R697", "NonpublishedID": "TA645rev", "Description": "Whether the signing of an insurance certificate was discrepant", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R698 / TA590rev", "PublishedID": "R698", "NonpublishedID": "TA590rev", "Description": "Whether the absence of the word “origin” in the goods description, the inclusion of “vessel” or “MV” before the actual vessel name or the absence of a contract number on a draft would be grounds for refusal", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 22; UCP 500 sub-article (9) (a) (iv)", "Rule": "ISBP 645, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R699 / TA607", "PublishedID": "R699", "NonpublishedID": "TA607", "Description": "Did the documents appear on their face to be inconsistent with one another? Did the consignee on the invoice and packing list differ from that on the B/L?", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraphs 24 and 199", "Rule": "ISBP 645", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R700 / TA588rev", "PublishedID": "R700", "NonpublishedID": "TA588rev", "Description": "Whether the calculation of an average weight involved detailed mathematical calculations", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 27", "Rule": "ISBP 645", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R701 / TA660rev", "PublishedID": "R701", "NonpublishedID": "TA660rev", "Description": "Whether the transposing of weights was a typographical error as described in paragraph 28 of ISBP 645", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 28; UCP 500 sub-article 13 (a)", "Rule": "ISBP 645, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R702 / TA606", "PublishedID": "R702", "NonpublishedID": "TA606", "Description": "Whether the title of a document must be as called for by letters of credit issued under UCP 500", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 43", "Rule": "ISBP 645", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R703 / TA637", "PublishedID": "R703", "NonpublishedID": "TA637", "Description": "Did the fact that the master’s receipt did not indicate “on board” with regard to 2/3 original bills of lading make this a reason for refusal? Where a required presentation of an analysis certificate and a document entitled “Quality Certificate” was made", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 43; UCP 500 Article 21", "Rule": "ISBP 645, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R704 / TA628rev", "PublishedID": "R704", "NonpublishedID": "TA628rev", "Description": "Whether a B/L stating “any port in HoChiMinh City” as a port of discharge was discrepant according to paragraph 83 of ISBP 645", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 83; UCP 500 sub-article 13 (a)", "Rule": "ISBP 645, UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R705 / TA585rev", "PublishedID": "R705", "NonpublishedID": "TA585rev", "Description": "When a party shown as the consignor is different from the beneficiary, whether it is unreasonable to receive a certificate of origin that provides reference to an invoice number and date not consistent with the invoice presented by the beneficiary; whethe", "RelatedArticles": "Paragraph 200", "Rule": "ISBP 645", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R706 / TA616rev", "PublishedID": "R706", "NonpublishedID": "TA616rev", "Description": "Problems in a direct collection where the collection instruction met the requirements of sub-article 4(b) and the collecting bank, a savings bank, neither declined to act according to the instruction nor to act in accordance therewith", "RelatedArticles": "Article 1 and sub-articles 4 (b) and 26 (c)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R707 / TA620", "PublishedID": "R707", "NonpublishedID": "TA620", "Description": "Whether a collecting bank acted according to banking practice concerning returning of documents by sending back only photocopies of the documents.", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 4.1 (i), 19 (a), 19 (b) and 26 (c) (iii)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R708 / TA600rev", "PublishedID": "R708", "NonpublishedID": "TA600rev", "Description": "Whether the URC makes a distinction between the form of advice or the interpretation to be placed on such an advice with regard to finality of payment", "RelatedArticles": "Sub-articles 16 (a) and 26 (c) (i)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R709 / TA623rev", "PublishedID": "R709", "NonpublishedID": "TA623rev", "Description": "A series of fundamental questions concerning the workings of the URDG", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 2, 1, 3, 20 and 28; sub-articles 20 (a) and (b)", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R710 / TA612", "PublishedID": "R710", "NonpublishedID": "TA612", "Description": "Whether the demand for payment was in conformity with the guarantee and the URDG", "RelatedArticles": "Article 20", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R711 / TA587rev", "PublishedID": "R711", "NonpublishedID": "TA587rev", "Description": "Whether a demand for payment made through an unauthenticated teletransmission is a “written” demand under the URDG", "RelatedArticles": "Article 20, sub-article 2 (d)", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R712 / TA586rev", "PublishedID": "R712", "NonpublishedID": "TA586rev", "Description": "Whether absent a specific requirement for such a copy, the instructing party is entitled to require either a copy or an original of the beneficiary’s demand and any accompanying documents in order to make payment under a counter-guarantee; what will be th", "RelatedArticles": "Article 21, sub-article 20 (b)", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R713 / TA624rev", "PublishedID": "R713", "NonpublishedID": "TA624rev", "Description": "Whether an extend or pay demand was contemplated and whether the situation falls within the scope of URDG 458", "RelatedArticles": "Articles 26 and 20", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2005-2008 (89)", "Opinion": "R714 / TA599", "PublishedID": "R714", "NonpublishedID": "TA599", "Description": "The non-compliance of a guarantor or a counter-guarantor with an act of the court and the consequences that would result from a possible breach; whether the requirement for the presentation of a written statement of breach by the beneficiary is in contrad", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous; article 20", "Rule": "URDG 458", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R715 / TA677rev", "PublishedID": "R715", "NonpublishedID": "TA677rev", "Description": "Where clauses in a credit from an issuing bank indicated that documents must be correct on first presentation, that the negotiating bank must certify that the documents were correct on first presentation and that documents on first presentation must be in", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 1", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R716 / TA704rev", "PublishedID": "R716", "NonpublishedID": "TA704rev", "Description": "A credit contained language indicating that if any terms and conditions in the credit are contradictory to, or inconsistent with, that of UCP 600, “the relative UCP 600 provisions are deemed expressly modified and/or excluded”. Is this sufficient to modif", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 1", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R717 / TA728rev", "PublishedID": "R717", "NonpublishedID": "TA728rev", "Description": "Where a copy of an [unpaid] invoice was presented under a standby credit, was it subject to examination under UCP 600 sub-article 18 (b)?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 1", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R718 / TA691rev", "PublishedID": "R718", "NonpublishedID": "TA691rev", "Description": "When the credit requirement was for a “signed commercial invoice”, whether, in terms of article 3, a stamp can act as a form of signature; when the credit required the bill of lading to be blank endorsed [by the shipper], whether any form of signature, wi", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 3; sub-article 18 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R719 / TA717rev2", "PublishedID": "R719", "NonpublishedID": "TA717rev2", "Description": "Where a credit contains an expiry in one place and the availability with a bank located in another", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 articles 6 and 35", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R720 / TA712rev", "PublishedID": "R720", "NonpublishedID": "TA712rev", "Description": "Whether a bank should honour its obligation/liability under 13 documentary credits when it has been placed under temporary administration by a state agency and the Central Bank", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 7", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R721 / TA674rev", "PublishedID": "R721", "NonpublishedID": "TA674rev", "Description": "Do all of the rights and protections of UCP 600 continue to prevail for all parties to a transaction once an extension to the maturity date has occurred as they do with the original acceptance/deferred payment? Is the answer different for an acceptance cr", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 7 (c); sub-articles 2 (b) and (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R722 / TA690rev4", "PublishedID": "R722", "NonpublishedID": "TA690rev4", "Description": "Whether a nominated bank acted on its nomination and in terms of prepaying or purchase of a draft accepted or a deferred payment undertaking incurred by a nominated bank; when and on which conditions must such prepayment or purchase be effected in order t", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 12 (b) and 7 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R723 / TA726", "PublishedID": "R723", "NonpublishedID": "TA726", "Description": "When shipment has been effected from two ports, does the charter bill of lading need to evidence separate on board notations for each port along with the relevant on board date? Would the position be different if the bill of lading were not subject to a c", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a); article 22", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R724 / TA731rev", "PublishedID": "R724", "NonpublishedID": "TA731rev", "Description": "Whether various clauses on insurance documents referring to damage and loss, general and specific conditions and ISM and classification certificates constituted discrepancies", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (a), 28 (h) and 28 (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R725 / TA749", "PublishedID": "R725", "NonpublishedID": "TA749", "Description": "When a certificate otherwise complies with the requirements of the credit, will the inclusion of a disclaimer text as indicated make that document discrepant?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R726 / TA723rev", "PublishedID": "R726", "NonpublishedID": "TA723rev", "Description": "Where the credit required the presentation of a freight invoice that was both dated and signed and the document was signed, but there is doubt that the date appearing thereon was in respect of the document or the date of the bill of lading; where, contrar", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (d), 16 (c), 16 (c) (iii) (a), 16 (c) (iii) (d) and 16 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R727 / TA747rev", "PublishedID": "R727", "NonpublishedID": "TA747rev", "Description": "Where a certificate of origin was presented with the words “We certify that the goods are of French origin” and bore the name of the beneficiary and a signature, but no relationship to the invoiced goods, was this a discrepancy?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (e) and (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R728 / TA685rev", "PublishedID": "R728", "NonpublishedID": "TA685rev", "Description": "Is there a requirement in UCP for a certificate of health to bear a description of the goods that corresponds with that given in the credit, or for any goods description shown to contain details such as grading, specifications or quality?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (e), (f) and (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R729 / TA681rev", "PublishedID": "R729", "NonpublishedID": "TA681rev", "Description": "Is a description of the goods required to appear on a bill of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (e), 20 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R730 / TA703rev", "PublishedID": "R730", "NonpublishedID": "TA703rev", "Description": "For the purposes of a clause such as “all documents must be issued in English”, should a draft be considered as one of the required documents? Does such a clause relate only to the data that would evidence compliance with the terms of the credit and the r", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (f) and 9 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R731 / TA714rev2", "PublishedID": "R731", "NonpublishedID": "TA714rev2", "Description": "Whether a document dated 16 April and forwarded by the bank on 29 April complied with the requirement in the credit for the presentation of the beneficiary declaration", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (i) and (a); article 5", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R732 / TA696", "PublishedID": "R732", "NonpublishedID": "TA696", "Description": "Whether the address of the applicant, when shown as notify party detail, must be identical to that stated in the credit", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (j) and 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R733 / TA702rev", "PublishedID": "R733", "NonpublishedID": "TA702rev", "Description": "Where the credit is silent with regard to the consignee and notify party details and these fields are completed with applicant addresses, must the addresses be the same as that quoted in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (j); ISBP 681 paragraph 144", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R734 / TA727rev", "PublishedID": "R734", "NonpublishedID": "TA727rev", "Description": "Whether several variations on the phrase “forwarders bill of lading not acceptable” had any meaning in terms of UCP 600", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (l) and articles 19-24", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R735 / TA741rev", "PublishedID": "R735", "NonpublishedID": "TA741rev", "Description": "Can the issuing bank use the UCP as a defence to avoid its commitment to pay the amount due under a complying presentation?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 15 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R736 / TA697rev", "PublishedID": "R736", "NonpublishedID": "TA697rev", "Description": "Where an issuing bank determined that a presentation was compliant and, several months later, attempted to repudiate its acceptance by saying that the presented bills of lading had been issued in both master and house form, is it still bound to pay?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 15 (a), 14 (b), 16 (c), 20 (a) (iv), 14 (a),and 14 (l); articles 20 and 34", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R737 / TA742rev", "PublishedID": "R737", "NonpublishedID": "TA742rev", "Description": "If a nominated bank’s confirmation has lapsed as a result of complying documents not being presented within the validity of the credit, is any subsequent agreement by the nominated bank either to reinstate its confirmation or to agree to act as if its con", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16, article 8", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R738 / TA719rev", "PublishedID": "R738", "NonpublishedID": "TA719rev", "Description": "Whether a bank has the right to request a refund of an amount overpaid when, under the UCP, the payment is considered to have been paid on a without recourse basis; whether a beneficiary and/or beneficiary bank have any responsibility to return an overpai", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R739 / TA676rev", "PublishedID": "R739", "NonpublishedID": "TA676rev", "Description": "When two notices of refusal rather than a single notice were sent to the presenter; when the issuing bank raised additional discrepancies other than those in its first message of refusal; validity of a discrepancy of "late presentation" when the covering", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c), (d) and (f), 14 (b) and (c), 15 (c), 6 (d) (i) and (d) (ii), 7 (c); article 35", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R740 / TA722rev", "PublishedID": "R740", "NonpublishedID": "TA722rev", "Description": "Where the credit did not require the contract number to appear on the certified copy of the fax but the beneficiary inserted "contract number" and quoted a number that was not the contract number stated in the credit or the number appearing as the contrac", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16 and sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R741 / TA700rev", "PublishedID": "R741", "NonpublishedID": "TA700rev", "Description": "Were charges deducted by the issuing bank acceptable when the credit stated all charges outside its country are for account of the beneficiary?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16; sub-articles 16 (f), (c) and (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R742 / TA698rev", "PublishedID": "R742", "NonpublishedID": "TA698rev", "Description": "Could a MT799 be construed to be an amendment message? Could a nominated bank, asked by another bank to add its confirmation through the instruction “may add”, be considered to be a confirming bank if it failed to advise the first bank it was not prepared", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c) (iii) (b), 11 (a), 8 (d), 10 (c), 10 (d), 7 (b), 9 (b), and 12 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R743 / TA689", "PublishedID": "R743", "NonpublishedID": "TA689", "Description": "When a refusal notice was sent 14 days following the day of presentation, was the issuing bank precluded under sub-article 16 (f) from claiming the documents did not constitute a complying presentation? Was there a non-documentary condition under sub-arti", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (d) and (f); 14 (h) and (a); 7 (c); article 5", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R744 / TA744rev", "PublishedID": "R744", "NonpublishedID": "TA744rev", "Description": "Whether the issuing bank, in endorsing one original bill of lading in favour of the applicant, acted in accordance with the requirements of sub-article 16 (c) (iii); whether the issuing bank, in not returning the documents, as stipulated in its notice, fa", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (f) and 16 (c) (iii) (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R745 / TA737rev", "PublishedID": "R745", "NonpublishedID": "TA737rev", "Description": "Whether a certificate of origin containing a reference that it could be verified online (together with the attached invoice) was acceptable as an original according to UCP 600 article 17", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 17; sub-article 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R746 / TA734", "PublishedID": "R746", "NonpublishedID": "TA734", "Description": "The meaning of conditions in L/Cs stating either that all documents must indicate certain data except the bill of lading or that the described data must not appear on any document except for the invoice and drafts", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 18", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R747 / TA706rev3", "PublishedID": "R747", "NonpublishedID": "TA706rev3", "Description": "Where a standby did not give a full indication of the underlying transaction(s) to which it was subject or prohibit an invoice being issued in the manner that it had been issued by the beneficiary", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 18; sub-articles 16 (c), 7 (a), 8 (a), 18 (c) and 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R748 / TA716rev2", "PublishedID": "R748", "NonpublishedID": "TA716rev2", "Description": "Whether the definition of applicant in article 2 is confined to the name of the party upon whose request the credit was issued; whether an invoice that only quotes the name of the applicant, without any address (including reference to their country) is ac", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 articles 18 and 2; sub-article 14 (j)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R749 / TA705rev", "PublishedID": "R749", "NonpublishedID": "TA705rev", "Description": "By shipping under a credit in which the routing of the goods was impossible, does the beneficiary bear the risk of refusal under the credit? Where an issuing bank was placed on notice that there were errors in the name and address of the beneficiary, can", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R750 / TA701rev", "PublishedID": "R750", "NonpublishedID": "TA701rev", "Description": "Whether there is a requirement in the UCP or international standard banking practice for the country name to appear in addition to the stated city shown as the place of receipt, port of loading, port of discharge or place of delivery. Effect of a shipped", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 19 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R751 / TA735rev", "PublishedID": "R751", "NonpublishedID": "TA735rev", "Description": "Given the routing for a shipment shown in fields 44A, E, F and B, whether the credit should have requested the presentation of a multimodal or combined transport document or a bill of lading; had the required transport document in the L/C been a multimoda", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 20 and articles 19 and 21-25", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R752 / TA748", "PublishedID": "R752", "NonpublishedID": "TA748", "Description": "Where the carrier was stated to be a branch of another carrier in another country, was the fact that it was a branch in a country different from the parent company mean that it was signed in accordance with UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (i)?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R753 / TA695rev", "PublishedID": "R753", "NonpublishedID": "TA695rev", "Description": "Where the party on a B/L as the named carrier and the signing party were one and the same company, did this mean the document complied with sub-article 20 (a) (i)? Where the box in which the name and address of the company appeared had no field tag, but w", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R754 / TA750rev", "PublishedID": "R754", "NonpublishedID": "TA750rev", "Description": "When a bill of lading clearly indicates the name of the carrier, can any of its branches, even those having a different name, issue bills of lading and sign them as a branch of the named carrier?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (a) (i), 19 (a) (i), 21 (a) (i), 23 (a) (i) and 24 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R755 / TA679rev", "PublishedID": "R755", "NonpublishedID": "TA679rev", "Description": "Where a bill of lading evidences an inland place of receipt, will the B/L require a dated on board notation bearing the name of the vessel and port of loading stated in the credit, even if the bill of lading is pre-printed "shipped on board in apparent go", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R756 / TA743rev", "PublishedID": "R756", "NonpublishedID": "TA743rev", "Description": "Where a B/L was poorly structured showing conflicting data, but where an on board notation provided clarifying data, was there a discrepancy? Does an on board notation always override where conflicting data appears in a bill of lading.", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R757 / TA708rev", "PublishedID": "R757", "NonpublishedID": "TA708rev", "Description": "Whether a country name has to appear against a stated city shown as the place of receipt, port of loading, port of discharge or place of delivery; whether an address, while not exactly the same as that stated in the credit, was a discrepancy; whether ther", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (a) (iii), 14 (a) (d) and (j); article 34; ISBP 681 paragraphs 35 and 25", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R758 / TA675rev", "PublishedID": "R758", "NonpublishedID": "TA675rev", "Description": "Whether wording on a negotiable B/L indicating: "Where the bill of lading is non-negotiable, the Carrier may give delivery of the Goods to the named consignee upon reasonable proof of identity and without requiring surrender of an original bill of lading"", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (v)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R759 / TA680rev", "PublishedID": "R759", "NonpublishedID": "TA680rev", "Description": "When reference to a clause on the reverse side of a bill of lading appears, is a bank required to read the terms and conditions of carriage which appear on the reverse of the transport document in order to understand the information contained in the recei", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (v)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R760 / TA678rev", "PublishedID": "R760", "NonpublishedID": "TA678rev", "Description": "Whether it was necessary to examine the terms and conditions of carriage to determine the name of the carrier and whether the method of signing the B/L constituted a discrepancy", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (a) (v) and 20 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R761 / TA751rev", "PublishedID": "R761", "NonpublishedID": "TA751rev", "Description": "Was it permissible for two separate full sets of charter party bills of lading to be presented that collectively evidenced shipment and transhipment of the goods from the port of loading stated in the credit to the port of discharge stated in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (c) (i) and 20 (c) (ii); article 22", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R762 / TA683", "PublishedID": "R762", "NonpublishedID": "TA683", "Description": "Whether a requirement for the presentation of the "respective" charter party modifies or excludes sub-article 22 (b), which says that a bank will not examine a charter party contract, even if required as a stipulated document under the credit", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 22 (b) and 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R763 / TA693", "PublishedID": "R763", "NonpublishedID": "TA693", "Description": "Whether a CMR showing a stamp and signature in field 23 complied with sub-article 24 (a) (i) of UCP 600 and whether field 16 must also be completed", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 24 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R764 / TA730rev", "PublishedID": "R764", "NonpublishedID": "TA730rev", "Description": "Whether banks have a responsibility to review pre-printed text on an insurance document that may be considered to be terms and conditions to determine compliance", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 28; sub-article 28 (j)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R765 / TA673rev", "PublishedID": "R765", "NonpublishedID": "TA673rev", "Description": "Whether an insurance document signed by a broker is acceptable", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R766 / TA709rev", "PublishedID": "R766", "NonpublishedID": "TA709rev", "Description": "Whether an insurance document that is dated later than the date of shipment, but which clearly indicates on the document, by addition or note, "coverage effected on a warehouse to warehouse basis" or words of similar effect, is acceptable", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (e)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R767 / TA732", "PublishedID": "R767", "NonpublishedID": "TA732", "Description": "Was an insurance document discrepant for a missing issuance date or effectiveness date, or could the countersignature date be taken as the effective date of the policy?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (e) and article 28", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R768 / TA687rev", "PublishedID": "R768", "NonpublishedID": "TA687rev", "Description": "Whether for the purposes of determination of compliance of an insurance document calculation to two decimal places represents international standard banking practice", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R769 / TA720rev", "PublishedID": "R769", "NonpublishedID": "TA720rev", "Description": "Whether the insurance coverage was compliant if the credit required the insurance coverage to be for 110% of the provisional invoice value; whether the description of the goods in the provisional invoice corresponded with that in the credit; the responsib", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (f) (ii); miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R770 / TA684", "PublishedID": "R770", "NonpublishedID": "TA684", "Description": "Does a superimposed stamp or other form of notation that provides evidence of the name and capacity of the party signing the transport document supersede any pre-printed wording that may imply a different form of signing for that bill of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R771 / TA686rev", "PublishedID": "R771", "NonpublishedID": "TA686rev", "Description": "Where a credit required a document to be issued in more than one language", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R772 / TA746rev", "PublishedID": "R772", "NonpublishedID": "TA746rev", "Description": "Where the credit required an insurance document to show an appointed settling agent did the document evidence the name of the settling agent?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R773 / TA738rev", "PublishedID": "R773", "NonpublishedID": "TA738rev", "Description": "Was there a clear requirement for a confirmation of signatures to appear on certain documents and not on a covering letter of the advising bank or in a separate SWIFT message? Could the confirmation be satisfied by a separate certificate or other document", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 8; UCP 600 article 16 and sub-articles 16 (c), 16 (c) (iii) and 16 (f)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R774 / TA699rev", "PublishedID": "R774", "NonpublishedID": "TA699rev", "Description": "Where the applicant’s name on an invoice was not issued in the English language; where a CMR was not issued in English and the place of delivery was not as per the L/C; where an insurance policy evidenced the place of departure different from the CMR", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 23; UCP 600 sub-articles 28 (f) (iii), 16 (c) (ii), 14 (d), 18 (a) (ii); article 9", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R775 / TA754rev", "PublishedID": "R775", "NonpublishedID": "TA754rev", "Description": "Whether the bank checked the total values in the invoice as required by UCP 600; whether, a box on a CMR titled ‘Sender’ completed with the details of the beneficiary met a condition in the credit for the CMR to show the Expeditor as the beneficiary; whet", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 24; UCP 600 article 16, sub-articles 16 (d), 16 (c) (iii), 16 (c) (iii) (b), 18 (c) and 7 (c); URR 725 sub-article 11 (a) (i)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R776 / TA692rev", "PublishedID": "R776", "NonpublishedID": "TA692rev", "Description": "Whether the name of the applicant on the protocol conflicted with that on the documentary credit", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 39", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R777 / TA694", "PublishedID": "R777", "NonpublishedID": "TA694", "Description": "Where, under a deferred payment credit, more than one complete set of documents was enclosed under the cover of a single schedule and whether this meant the issuing bank should have paid under one maturity date", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 sub-paragraph 43 (f); paragraphs 44 and 47", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R778 / TA688rev", "PublishedID": "R778", "NonpublishedID": "TA688rev", "Description": "Whether insurance documents should or should not indicate or be required to indicate the assured as “To Order” or “To Bearer”.", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 179", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R779 / TA736rev", "PublishedID": "R779", "NonpublishedID": "TA736rev", "Description": "Where documents complied as of the date of their presentation and whether the issuing bank should approach the court that issued a court order to explain its responsibilities under the UCP, to state that the documents did comply and to urge that the order", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 500 sub-article 9 (d) (i)", "Rule": " UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R780 / TA753rev", "PublishedID": "R780", "NonpublishedID": "TA753rev", "Description": "Whether the documents were refused in time; whether a reasonable time, not exceeding seven banking days following receipt of the documents, is curtailed by an expiry date that may occur following the date of presentation but within that period; whether re", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 500 sub-articles 13 (b), 14 (c), 14 (b) and 42 (a) and (b)", "Rule": " UCP 500", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R781 / TA711rev", "PublishedID": "R781", "NonpublishedID": "TA711rev", "Description": "Whether a collecting bank, having issued a delivery order without taking an instruction from the buyer to honour the underlying collection instruction, could be liable under the applicable law", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-article 10 (a) and article 9", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R782 / TA713", "PublishedID": "R782", "NonpublishedID": "TA713", "Description": "Was the collecting bank entitled to deduct its "SWIFT charge", although all charges were for account of the drawee and were not allowed to be waived?", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-articles 26 (c) (1) and (2) and sub-article 21 (b)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R783 / TA745", "PublishedID": "R783", "NonpublishedID": "TA745", "Description": "Whether three clauses listed fall within the “three-year rule” as described in URDG 758 sub-article 25 (c) and whether they represent non-documentary conditions and should be disregarded", "RelatedArticles": "URDG 758 articles 2 and 7; sub-articles 25 (c), 25 (b) (ii) and (iii)", "Rule": "URDG 758", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2009-2011 (70)", "Opinion": "R784 / TA740rev", "PublishedID": "R784", "NonpublishedID": "TA740rev", "Description": "Can the guarantor or counter-guarantor use the URDG as a defence to avoid its commitment to pay the amount claimed under a complying demand?", "RelatedArticles": "URDG 758 sub-article 20 (b)", "Rule": "URDG 758", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R785 / TA812rev", "PublishedID": "R785", "NonpublishedID": "TA812rev", "Description": "Beneficiary is permitted to draw under a credit by way of a provisional invoice with a subsequent final invoice indicating whether the balance is due to the beneficiary or the applicant. However, the credit does not provide the conditions or process under", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 articles 2, 7 and 8; ISBP 745 preliminary consideration (iv)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R786 / TA769rev", "PublishedID": "R786", "NonpublishedID": "TA769rev", "Description": "When a credit requires a commercial invoice to be signed, sworn and detailed, what is to be understood to be “sworn”?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 3", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R787 / TA785rev", "PublishedID": "R787", "NonpublishedID": "TA785rev", "Description": "When a credit expires at the counters of the issuing bank and documents are to be sent in two mailings, are both mailings to be received by the issuing bank within the expiry date?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 6 (d) (ii), 6 (e) and 7 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R788 / TA805rev", "PublishedID": "R788", "NonpublishedID": "TA805rev", "Description": "A credit required, amongst other documents, the presentation of a Health Certificate in one original and two copies; the issuing bank only received one original and one copy; can the issuing bank still maintain a refusal notice for the absence of one copy", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 6 (d)(ii), 6(e) and 7( c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R789 / TA808rev", "PublishedID": "R789", "NonpublishedID": "TA808rev", "Description": "Reimbursement condition where the issuing bank will reimburse only after receiving funds from the applicant", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 7", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R790 / TA806rev", "PublishedID": "R790", "NonpublishedID": "TA806rev", "Description": "Credits that require confirmation from the negotiating (nominated) bank that the amount of the drawing has been endorsed on the reverse of the credit, and where no such confirmation is given by the nominated bank", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 7 (a), article 2 and sub-article 7 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R791 / TA762rev", "PublishedID": "R791", "NonpublishedID": "TA762rev", "Description": "When a standby letter of credit is issued that contains an evergreen clause, is a confirming bank bound by the conditions of the evergreen clause or may it terminate its confirmation at the end of each anniversary of the expiry date?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 7(b ), 8( b)and 10 (a); UCP 600 article 1", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R792 / TA822rev", "PublishedID": "R792", "NonpublishedID": "TA822rev", "Description": "When there is more than one confirming bank, what are the rights and obligations that exist between each confirming bank, and between each confirming bank and the issuing bank; can a first confirming bank instruct another bank to add its confirmation with", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 8 (a) and 9( b);UC P600 articles 9, 7 and 35", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R793 / TA780rev", "PublishedID": "R793", "NonpublishedID": "TA780rev", "Description": "May an advising bank add conditions and request documents in addition to those established by the issuing bank; can an ICC National Committee act as an interpreter of UCP and provide direction for an entity to change its practices?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 9 (b )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R794 / TA757rev", "PublishedID": "R794", "NonpublishedID": "TA757rev", "Description": "Where a discrepant presentation was released against settlement of an agreed reduced amount, but subject to a final payment under the credit being for a fixed amount and payable against an applicant’s certificate of successful testing, commissioning and l", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 10 (b )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R795 / TA820rev4", "PublishedID": "R795", "NonpublishedID": "TA820rev4", "Description": "When a credit is amended and the beneficiary makes a subsequent presentation under it, but without taking into account the amendment, is the amendment considered rejected or can it be accepted at a later date by the beneficiary for use with any future pre", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 10 ( c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R796 / TA825rev", "PublishedID": "R796", "NonpublishedID": "TA825rev", "Description": "Nominated bank makes a prepayment under its deferred payment undertaking; at maturity, no reimbursement is received; issuing bank subsequently advises that it has effected settlement to the beneficiary directly by SWIFT MT103 message; does the issuing ban", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 12 (b) and 7 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R797 / TA807rev", "PublishedID": "R797", "NonpublishedID": "TA807rev", "Description": "Is URR 725 to be applied when the credit is silent with regard to its application; are the confirming bank entitled to claim delay interest when reimbursement is received according to URR 725 article 11 and not the value date in its reimbursement claim?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 13 (b) (ii) and article 8; URR 725 article 11; UCP 600 sub-articles b), (c) and 13 b) (iii)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R798 / TA763", "PublishedID": "R798", "NonpublishedID": "TA763", "Description": "Standby letter of credit covers non-payment for delivery of airfield ground lighting and services rendered; one of the required documents is a copy of a transport document; partial drawings are allowed; when a claim is made for services, is a copy of a tr", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a); UCP 600 article s 5 and 7, and sub-articles 14 (b) and 16 (a);", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R799 / TA770rev2", "PublishedID": "R799", "NonpublishedID": "TA770rev2", "Description": "Does shipment from “Any Chinese Port” include shipment from Hong Kong port?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R800 / TA787", "PublishedID": "R800", "NonpublishedID": "TA787", "Description": "A bill of lading with incomplete number of pages is stated to be not acceptable; presented charter party bills of lading indicate “Page 01” on the reverse but there is no indication of “Page 02” on its face", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R801 / TA796rev", "PublishedID": "R801", "NonpublishedID": "TA796rev", "Description": "What is to be understood when a credit requires shipment to be effected from “Any North European Port”?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a); ISBP 745pr elimin aryconsideration (v )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R802 / TA834rev", "PublishedID": "R802", "NonpublishedID": "TA834rev", "Description": "When a credit covering the shipment of 8 units of cranes with accessories allows partial shipment, is it possible to effect a partial shipment of part of one or more cranes with accessories?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a); UCP 600 article 5", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R803 / TA789rev", "PublishedID": "R803", "NonpublishedID": "TA789rev", "Description": "Documents to be presented within 10 calendar days after the date of issuance of the credit; documents so presented but evidencing shipment effected six months earlier; despite the condition for presentation of documents in the credit, the issuing bank ref", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (c) and 14 (i); article 1; ISBP 681 paragraph 2", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R804 / TA826rev", "PublishedID": "R804", "NonpublishedID": "TA826rev", "Description": "Presentation is to occur at least 21 days after the date of shipment; is a presentation made prior to the 21st day after the date of shipment discrepant for “early presentation” and can the issuing bank return those documents to the presenter; if the issu", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (c), 16 (c) (iii), 16 (c), 16 (c) (iii) (c), 14 (b) and 15 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R805 / TA758", "PublishedID": "R805", "NonpublishedID": "TA758", "Description": "Should a “shipping date” mentioned in a packing list, be the same date as the on board date appearing in a bill of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 ( d)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R806 / TA777rev", "PublishedID": "R806", "NonpublishedID": "TA777rev", "Description": "Issuing bank refused documents for six reasons citing “inconsistency” or “differing” data between documents, and between the data and the terms and conditions of the credit; the nominated bank refuted all the discrepancies", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R807 / TA786rev2", "PublishedID": "R807", "NonpublishedID": "TA786rev2", "Description": "Quantity of goods is shown in a credit without indicating whether it is a gross or net weight; amount of the invoice was based on a “commercial weight” that was greater than the gross weight; was invoicing on the basis of the commercial weight acceptable?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (d)and 30(b )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R808 / TA810rev", "PublishedID": "R808", "NonpublishedID": "TA810rev", "Description": "Documents are presented in the sum of US$54,000 under a credit prohibiting partial shipment; the shipment advice to the insurance company indicates the amount as US$54,00.00; is the omission of a “0” a discrepancy; can the issuing bank raise a further dis", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d); ISBP 745 paragraph A23; UCP 600 f)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R809 / TA811rev", "PublishedID": "R809", "NonpublishedID": "TA811rev", "Description": "A credit did not indicate a PO number that was to be shown as part of the goods description; the invoice showed PO # SOL140430-01 whereas the packing list showed PO #SOL140; is there a conflict of data?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14(d), 16(e ), 12(c ), and 7 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R810 / TA817rev", "PublishedID": "R810", "NonpublishedID": "TA817rev", "Description": "Does a bill of lading marked “CY/CY” comply with a requirement for shipment to be effected in a FCL (Full Container Load) container?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R811 / TA823rev", "PublishedID": "R811", "NonpublishedID": "TA823rev", "Description": "Credit requires bill of lading (or charter party bill of lading) to indicate the value of freight prepaid and all documents are to mention the credit number; the face of the charter party bill of lading neither mentions the amount of freight that has been", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14(d); ISBP 745 paragraph G24 ; UCP 600 sub-article14(a);ISB Pagraphs A 9 an dA7 )(i)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R812 / TA824rev", "PublishedID": "R812", "NonpublishedID": "TA824rev", "Description": "Invoice quotes pre-printed payment terms that are not in accordance with the payment terms of the credit; invoice also quotes the payment terms of the credit; packing list and weight list indicate additional order numbers that are not covered by the invoi", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14(d), 16( c )(ii) and 14(f ); ISBP 745 paragraphs M1 and C11", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R813 / TA828rev", "PublishedID": "R813", "NonpublishedID": "TA828rev", "Description": "Certificate of Origin refers to an attached packing list/weight memo “REV03” whereas the presented packing list/weight memo is marked “REV04”", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (d) and (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R814 / TA832rev2", "PublishedID": "R814", "NonpublishedID": "TA832rev2", "Description": "Packing list shows net weight as 630,000kg and gross weight as 630,360kg; copy of a bill of lading shows 36 containers and net weight 630,000kg but under a heading “Gross wgt/Nett wgt” the same weight, i.e. 630,000kg; confirming bank refused the documents", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (d)and (f )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R815 / TA809rev", "PublishedID": "R815", "NonpublishedID": "TA809rev", "Description": "A credit refers to a proforma invoice number 104 whereas the presented CMR indicates proforma invoice number 1074; is there a conflict of data?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (e) and (d); ISBP 745 paragraph A23; UCP 600 c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R816 / TA772", "PublishedID": "R816", "NonpublishedID": "TA772", "Description": "Is a certificate of origin acceptable that evidences goods produced by a company in Switzerland as opposed to certifying goods are of Switzerland origin?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14(f); ISBP 681 paragraph 181", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R817 / TA783", "PublishedID": "R817", "NonpublishedID": "TA783", "Description": "Was a certificate of quality compliant despite it showing a specification above a quoted limit, and referring to other reference methods used in determining the specifications when the credit only referred to one reference method?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R818 / TA799rev", "PublishedID": "R818", "NonpublishedID": "TA799rev", "Description": "Credit requires the presentation of a guarantee payable in Country X; the presented guarantee complies with the limited requirements in the credit except it does not refer to it being payable in Country X; can this requirement be deemed to be non-document", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (h) and 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R819 / TA764rev", "PublishedID": "R819", "NonpublishedID": "TA764rev", "Description": "Issuing bank refused documents due to invoice not quoting Incoterm; replacement invoices received and dispatched by nominated bank one day after expiry date without confirmation of date of receipt; documents then refused due to credit expired and applican", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16; UCP 600 sub-articles 6 (d) (i), 4 (a) and 14 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R820 / TA795rev", "PublishedID": "R820", "NonpublishedID": "TA795rev", "Description": "Must an issuing bank issue a refusal notice in order to be able to claim its discrepancy fee?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R821 / TA802rev", "PublishedID": "R821", "NonpublishedID": "TA802rev", "Description": "Did the beneficiary need to present the original advice of the stand-by letter of credit when it made a demand; can a bank raise further discrepancies relating to a presentation at a later date?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 16 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R822 / TA778rev", "PublishedID": "R822", "NonpublishedID": "TA778rev", "Description": "Issuing bank refused documents citing nine discrepancies relating to conflicts of data between documents and between one or more documents and the terms and conditions of the credit", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c)(ii), 18(c) , 14( e )and 14( d) ; UCP 600 article 22", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R823 / TA782", "PublishedID": "R823", "NonpublishedID": "TA782", "Description": "Documents received by confirming bank within expiry date and forwarded to issuing bank on “approval basis”; issuing bank issues its refusal notice 14 days after its receipt of documents; issuing bank declares that as it received documents after the expiry", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (d), 16 (f), 14 (a) and 16 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R824 / TA792rev", "PublishedID": "R824", "NonpublishedID": "TA792rev", "Description": "Can two insurance documents printed “black on white” be considered as originals?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 17 (b) and 28 (a); ISBP 745 paragraphs A27,", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R825 / TA755rev", "PublishedID": "R825", "NonpublishedID": "TA755rev", "Description": "Is a requirement for a copy of an invoice satisfied by the presentation of a photocopy of the original invoice; was the description of goods on the CMR shown in general terms not conflicting with the description shown in the credit; did a correction on th", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 17 (d)and 14( e) ; ISBP 681 paragraphs 165, 9 and 11; UCP 600 sub-articles16 ( b) and 16 ( c)(iii)(a) and(b), an d sub-article14( d)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R826 / TA818rev", "PublishedID": "R826", "NonpublishedID": "TA818rev", "Description": "Does a commercial invoice with a box labelled “addressee” and completed with the details of the applicant comply with the requirement in sub-article 18 (a) (ii) for the invoice to be made out in the name of the applicant?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R827 / TA814rev4", "PublishedID": "R827", "NonpublishedID": "TA814rev4", "Description": "When an invoice uses the symbol “$” to indicate the currency is United States Dollars, is this sufficient; if a bill of lading requirement does not indicate a consignee but does state that it is to be blank endorsed, does this permit the presentation of a", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (iii); ISBP745 paragraph C6( c )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R828 / TA756", "PublishedID": "R828", "NonpublishedID": "TA756", "Description": "Does the detailed description of the goods, appearing on the invoice beneath the description shown in the credit, change the category or classification of the goods?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18(c); ISBP 681 paragraph 58; UCP 600 sub-articl14(e )", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R829 / TA813", "PublishedID": "R829", "NonpublishedID": "TA813", "Description": "Combined transport bill of lading is signed by the master, in addition there is a stamp that includes the name of the vessel, the name of a shipping company and an address, and name of the carrier; does the signature and stamp create a conflict in determi", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 19 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R830 / TA840rev", "PublishedID": "R830", "NonpublishedID": "TA840rev", "Description": "Did the documentary requirement for the bills of lading require that the bill of lading evidence shipment on or by a “regular liner vessel”?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 20", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R831 / TA791rev", "PublishedID": "R831", "NonpublishedID": "TA791rev", "Description": "Is there sufficient evidence that the named agent has signed on behalf of the named carrier?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (i); ISBP 745 paragraph E5 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R832 / TA773", "PublishedID": "R832", "NonpublishedID": "TA773", "Description": "Can a date inserted on a bill of lading in a box designated “Shipped on Board Date” be accepted as the shipped on board date, without any additional stamp or notation?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (a) (ii) and 14(c);ISBP 681 paragraph 9 6", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R833 / TA775rev", "PublishedID": "R833", "NonpublishedID": "TA775rev", "Description": "Can a charter party bill of lading be signed by a carrier or by a named agent for a named carrier?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 22 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R834 / TA793rev", "PublishedID": "R834", "NonpublishedID": "TA793rev", "Description": "A continuation of the subject covered in Opinion R833 (TA775rev); can a charter party bill of lading be signed by a carrier or by a named agent for a named carrier; can it be signed according to sub-article 22 (a) (i) and still indicate the name of the ca", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 22 (a) (i); ISBP745 p ar a graphsG2 ( b)and G 1", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R835 / TA800rev", "PublishedID": "R835", "NonpublishedID": "TA800rev", "Description": "Is there a conflict with regard to the signing capacity of a charter party bill of lading when it is apparently signed by the master but also bears a stamp that provides the vessel’s name, the word “Master” and “on behalf of Owners”?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 22 (a) (i); ISBP 745 paragraph G4 (b)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R836 / TA836rev", "PublishedID": "R836", "NonpublishedID": "TA836rev", "Description": "Charter party bill of lading is signed by the master but also bears a stamp indicating the vessel name and what appears to be the name of the owner or shipping company; does the signature and the stamp create a conflict with regard to determining the capa", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 22 ( a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R837 / TA765rev", "PublishedID": "R837", "NonpublishedID": "TA765rev", "Description": "How to satisfy a requirement in a credit for an air waybill to contain an on board notation; despite dispatch by air, the credit indicates the Incoterm as FOB Singapore whereas the beneficiary has indicated FCA Singapore Changi Airport on its invoice", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 23; UCP 600 sub-artile s 18 ( c)and4(a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R838 / TA819rev", "PublishedID": "R838", "NonpublishedID": "TA819rev", "Description": "A common form of CMR document contains three fields where the carrier name could be mentioned — field 16 ‘Transporter’, field 17 ‘Transporter successive’ and field 23 ‘Signature and stamp of Transporter’; when two or three of these fields are completed wi", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 24 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R839 / TA788rev", "PublishedID": "R839", "NonpublishedID": "TA788rev", "Description": "Is a bill of lading marked “vessel under arrest 18 February 2013” considered to be an unclean transport document?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 27 and sub-article 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R840 / TA835rev", "PublishedID": "R840", "NonpublishedID": "TA835rev", "Description": "An insurance policy is signed as proxy for the insurance company; is the signature acceptable without naming the proxy?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 28 (a); ISBP 745 paragraphs K2, K3 and K4", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R841 / TA784rev", "PublishedID": "R841", "NonpublishedID": "TA784rev", "Description": "Based on different possible documentary requirements of a credit, when must an insurance document indicate the number of originals that have been issued and how many originals must be presented?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 28 (b)and 17( e) ; ISBP 745 paragraph A2 8", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R842 / TA829rev", "PublishedID": "R842", "NonpublishedID": "TA829rev", "Description": "Credit amount stated to be “not exceeding”, with the quantity of goods subject to a tolerance of +/-10%; partial shipments are allowed; requirement for a final shipment document; quantity of goods shipped is just below maximum tolerance figure, however am", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 30", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R843 / TA816rev", "PublishedID": "R843", "NonpublishedID": "TA816rev", "Description": "A credit permits partial shipments but allows the beneficiary to present a certificate if, following a partial shipment, no further shipments are to occur; beneficiary ships only 360 bags (out of 500 bags) of dried grain; can the issuing bank refuse docum", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 31", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R844 / TA831rev", "PublishedID": "R844", "NonpublishedID": "TA831rev", "Description": "Credit is confirmed, but beneficiary declares that it never requested confirmation; is the beneficiary responsible for payment of the confirmation fees when charges are stated to be for the beneficiaries account; is a bank responsible for translating a ch", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 35", "Rule": "UCP 600 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R845 / TA766", "PublishedID": "R845", "NonpublishedID": "TA766", "Description": "When a credit requires two certificates to be issued at “Load” or “Loading” port, does this relate to the place of the certification and/or the place of issuance of the certificates?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R846 / TA768", "PublishedID": "R846", "NonpublishedID": "TA768", "Description": "Can an issuing bank refuse documents when they are received from a nominated bank in one lot instead of two, as required by the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R847 / TA833rev", "PublishedID": "R847", "NonpublishedID": "TA833rev", "Description": "When the weight of a commodity is expressed in ADMT (Air Dry Metric Tons), can the net weight be greater than the gross weight?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R848 / TA838rev", "PublishedID": "R848", "NonpublishedID": "TA838rev", "Description": "Credit indicates the payment terms as 30 days after transport document date; presented invoice indicates payment terms of “L/C 30 days sight”; issuing bank refuses documents due to conflict of payment terms", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R849 / TA767rev", "PublishedID": "R849", "NonpublishedID": "TA767rev", "Description": "Did a copy of an air waybill need to show the actual airport of departure rather than a country name; did the insurance policy contain the correct air waybill date as required by the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 20; UCP 600 article 23; UCP 600 sub-article 14 (f ); ISBP 681 par agraph 142 ; UCP e)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R850 / TA776rev", "PublishedID": "R850", "NonpublishedID": "TA776rev", "Description": "A credit contained no conditions regarding the language of documents, but the confirmation was qualified to the effect that documents were to be issued in English language; as the shipping marks contained wording in Spanish language, was the confirming ba", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 23", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R851 / TA781rev", "PublishedID": "R851", "NonpublishedID": "TA781rev", "Description": "Issuing bank refused a presentation due to a truck consignment note marked “duplicate” despite it being issued on the original letterhead of the carrier and manually signed; what constitutes an original document and was the refusal correct?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 28; UCP 600 sub-articles 17 (b), 24 (b) (i) and (ii); sub-article 17 e)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R852 / TA774", "PublishedID": "R852", "NonpublishedID": "TA774", "Description": "Credit required an analysis certificate and certificate of conformity to be stamped and signed whereas the beneficiary’s name is typed on the certificates and a manual signature has been added; does a courier receipt, which supports a beneficiary certific", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraphs 39 and 26; UCP 600 article 3", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R853 / TA779rev", "PublishedID": "R853", "NonpublishedID": "TA779rev", "Description": "Documents refused due to SASO certification charges added to the invoice value, insurance document not presented in a full set and it refers to general terms and conditions that did not form part of the presented document", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 61; UCP 600 sub-articles16( c) (ii i),28(g) and 16( d)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R854 / TA790rev", "PublishedID": "R854", "NonpublishedID": "TA790rev", "Description": "When a standby letter of credit requires the presentation of a copy of a bill of lading when shipment is effected by vessel, and states such document will be accepted as presented, subject to the fulfilment of two conditions, is a copy of a charter party", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraphs 115 and 20; UCP 600 sub-article14 (f)and article 20; ISBP 745 paragraphs A6", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R855 / TA759", "PublishedID": "R855", "NonpublishedID": "TA759", "Description": "One co-insurer signs an insurance policy, but does it require signing by the other named co-insurer?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 174; UCP 600 sub-article 28 (a)", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R856 / TA837rev", "PublishedID": "R856", "NonpublishedID": "TA837rev", "Description": "An invoice is refused as it included “Industries” as part of the name of the applicant whereas the credit used the abbreviation “Ind”", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph A1; UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (ii); UCP 600 d)", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R857 / TA827rev", "PublishedID": "R857", "NonpublishedID": "TA827rev", "Description": "Can a copy of a bill of lading indicate that the original was signed by a freight forwarder in the capacity of “forwarder” as opposed to being signed as carrier or agent of a named carrier?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph A6 (a); UCP 600 sub-articles 20 (a) (i), 20 (a) (iv), 14 (f ) and 26", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R858 / TA815rev", "PublishedID": "R858", "NonpublishedID": "TA815rev", "Description": "Does a bill of lading marked “Free Out” comply with terms of delivery “CPT Alexandria Port, Egypt without unloading cost”; delays in reimbursement due to non-issuance of a reimbursement authorisation; were charges levied by the reimbursing bank appropriat", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph E27 (b ); UCP 600 article 13; UCP 600 sub-articl es 26 ( c), 14 ( d) and", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R859 / TA839rev", "PublishedID": "R859", "NonpublishedID": "TA839rev", "Description": "Does a date appearing in the “Flight/Date” box of an air transport document represent the date of shipment?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraphs H8 (a) and(b); UCP 600 sub-article 23 ( a) (iii)", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R860 / TA794rev", "PublishedID": "R860", "NonpublishedID": "TA794rev", "Description": "Can a bank insist on a specific layout or structure for an insurance document when it is to be countersigned?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph K5; UCP 600 sub-article 28 (a)", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R861 / TA797rev", "PublishedID": "R861", "NonpublishedID": "TA797rev", "Description": "Collection amount is reduced by a subsequent amendment from the remitting bank, but the full amount is collected and paid by the collecting bank; remitting bank subsequently credited the full amount to the account of the principal; is the remitting bank r", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-article 4 ( a) (i)", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R862 / TA801rev", "PublishedID": "R862", "NonpublishedID": "TA801rev", "Description": "Several collection instructions all indicating, among other documents, that 3/3 original bills of lading were enclosed; goods were subsequently released against the surrender of one original bill of lading with presenting bank insisting that only 2/3 orig", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-articles 4 (b) (vi), 12 (a), 1 (b) and 1 (c)", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R863 / TA821", "PublishedID": "R863", "NonpublishedID": "TA821", "Description": "Collection instruction sent to a branch of a bank that does not provide international collection settlements; envelope containing the collection instruction and documents handed to the drawee; drawee took possession of the goods without effecting settleme", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-articles 5 (d), 1 (b) and (c)", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R864 / TA830rev", "PublishedID": "R864", "NonpublishedID": "TA830rev", "Description": "Two collection instructions each containing a full set of bills of lading; goods covered by each collection instruction were released to the drawee against surrender of an original bill of lading without settlement thereof; effect of the issuance of a cou", "RelatedArticles": "URC 522 sub-article 26 (c) (iii); URC 522 articles 1, 6 and 9; URC 522 sub-articles", "Rule": "URC 522 ", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R865 / TA761rev2", "PublishedID": "R865", "NonpublishedID": "TA761rev2", "Description": "Effect of a counter-guarantee that indicates “NONE” in field 40C of an MT760 and provides a governing law and jurisdiction clause, whereas the guarantee is to be issued subject to URDG 758", "RelatedArticles": "URDG 758 sub-articles 1b ), (c)and (a); ISP98 rule 1.01 (b )", "Rule": "URDG 758", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "2012-2016 (82)", "Opinion": "R866 / TA760rev", "PublishedID": "R866", "NonpublishedID": "TA760rev", "Description": "Effect of a counter-guarantee that indicates “URDG” in field 40C of an MT760 and provides a governing law and jurisdiction clause for the guarantee and counter-guarantee", "RelatedArticles": "URDG 758 sub-articles 34 (b) and 35 (b), 34 (a) and 35 (a); sub-articles 1 b)", "Rule": "URDG 758", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R869 / TA841rev2", "PublishedID": "R869", "NonpublishedID": "TA841rev2", "Description": "Impact of an extend or pay request under UCP 600; Did the content of the extend or pay request, issued by a confirming bank, meet the requirements under the standby letter of credit for the presentation of a complying demand, in the event the extension request was denied?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 8 (a) and 7 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R874 / TA843rev", "PublishedID": "R874", "NonpublishedID": "TA843rev", "Description": "When determining whether an electronically produced document is an original or not, does it matter if it is issued in colour or black and white?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 17, ISBP 745 paragraph A27", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R877 / TA844rev", "PublishedID": "R877", "NonpublishedID": "TA844rev", "Description": "When the positioning of an agents stamp and signature, when signing as agent for a named carrier, appears within the area designated for “Signature of Shipper” or his agent does this identify the capacity in which the air waybill has been signed and meet the requirements of article 23?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 23, ISBP 745 paragraphs A17 and A37, and UCP 600 sub-article 16 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R878 / TA846rev", "PublishedID": "R878", "NonpublishedID": "TA846rev", "Description": "Do certain remarks, made by the master in respect of the condition of the containers, constitute a clause or notation expressly declaring a defective condition of the packaging of the goods?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 27, ISBP 745 paragraphs F18 (b) and E20", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R885 / TA847rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA847rev", "Description": "Can a BPO be issued where one bank, but through different branches, undertakes the role of Obligor Bank and Recipient Bank?", "RelatedArticles": "URBPO 750 article 2, sub-article 1 (a), article 5 and sub-article 2 (a)", "Rule": "URBPO", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R868 / TA848rev", "PublishedID": "R868", "NonpublishedID": "TA848rev", "Description": "When a box in a Health Certificate is labeled “Species / Scientific name” is it acceptable for it to be completed with the scientific name of the goods rather than a general description that is not in conflict with that stated in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 7, sub-articles 16 (d), 16 (c) (iii) (b) and (c), article 12 and sub-article 7 (a) (i)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R879 / TA849rev3", "PublishedID": "R879", "NonpublishedID": "TA849rev3", "Description": "Is a clause relating to the U.S. Administration Regulations regarding the non-diversion of the goods after receipt by the buyer, tantamount to a sanctions clause?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R867 / TA851rev3", "PublishedID": "R867", "NonpublishedID": "TA851rev3", "Description": "Did a document titled ‘Applicant’s Acceptance Certificate’ provide evidence that it was issued and signed by the applicant?; When a sight draft is required, is it sufficient for the draft to simply indicate “At sight ….”?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 1, ISBP 745 paragraph B2 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R870 / TA852rev", "PublishedID": "R870", "NonpublishedID": "TA852rev", "Description": "In a confirmed letter of credit, where partial shipments are allowed and the payment terms include “90% of the L/C value will be paid against presentation of complying shipping documents”, is it correct that a confirming bank need only honour or negotiate once complying documents covering shipment of the full quantity of goods are presented?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 8", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R883 / TA853rev", "PublishedID": "R883", "NonpublishedID": "TA853rev", "Description": "When a credit requires all documents to indicate the contract number and date, does this include the draft and courier receipt?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraphs A19 (a) and B2-B17", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R873 / TA855rev", "PublishedID": "R873", "NonpublishedID": "TA855rev", "Description": "Is a non-bank issuer of a letter of credit held to the same standards and requirements as an issuer that is a bank, including where the refusal process is not administered in accordance with UCP 600 article 16? ", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c) (iii) (b), 16 (e) and 16 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R871 / TA856rev", "PublishedID": "R871", "NonpublishedID": "TA856rev", "Description": "Where all other data within an invoice complies with the terms and conditions of the credit, does the addition of an additional digit within two contract numbers create a conflict of data or can it be considered as a typographical error?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d), ISBP 745 paragraph A23", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R886 /TA857rev2", "PublishedID": "R886", "NonpublishedID": "TA857rev2", "Description": "Credit expires in the country of the beneficiary and is available with any bank by negotiation but documents are to be received by the issuing bank within 21 days after the date of shipment. Can the condition regarding the presentation period be shown in field 78 of an MT700 and what is the effect of such an inclusion?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (c) and article 6", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R876 / TA858rev", "PublishedID": "R876", "NonpublishedID": "TA858rev", "Description": "Has the on board notation been issued in respect of the correct vessel? Are ICC Opinion R350 and R352, which were issued in respect of credits subject to UCP 500, still applicable under UCP 600?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (iii), ISBP 745 paragraph E6 (c) and (e), and sub-article 20 (a) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R884 / TA859rev", "PublishedID": "R884", "NonpublishedID": "TA859rev", "Description": "When quoting the Incoterm on an invoice, is it necessary to include the name of the country as well as the city or port or place? Can the Incoterms details be shown in various places on an invoice and collectively comply with the details shown in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraphs E9, C8 and C3", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R875 / TA860", "PublishedID": "R875", "NonpublishedID": "TA860", "Description": "If the goods description in a credit makes no mention of spare parts, may a packing list indicate that one package includes spare parts? Could the invoice refer to spare parts?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18 (c), ISBP 745 paragraph C12 (b), UCP 600 sub-article 14 (e) and ISBP 745 paragraph C5", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R872 / TA861rev", "PublishedID": "R872", "NonpublishedID": "TA861rev", "Description": "When a credit requires a performance guarantee, as one of the stipulated documents, and for it to be issued for a specified amount and expiry date, may the presented guarantee indicate that the amount will reduce upon presentation to its applicant of a copy of a performance test certificate, and that the guarantee will expire on the earlier of three events, one of which is the expiry date of the guarantee which is mentioned in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R882 / TA862", "PublishedID": "R882", "NonpublishedID": "TA862", "Description": "When a credit requires an air waybill to indicate the flight number and date, does an air waybill comply that indicates this information but has no date of issuance?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph A11 (a) (iii), UCP 600 sub-article 23 (a) (iii) and ISBP 745 paragraph H8", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R880 / TA863", "PublishedID": "R880", "NonpublishedID": "TA863", "Description": "When a credit requires shipment to ‘Alexandria Seaport, Egypt’, does a bill of lading comply that indicates ‘Alexandria, Egypt’ in the port of discharge field?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R899 / TA864rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA864rev", "Description": "When a credit requires the presentation of a certificate of origin by reference to a document in the form of a specific trade agreement between two countries and there is no field in the document for country of origin, does this permit the document to be accepted without reference to the country of origin?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraphs L2, L1, A39, L3 (c) (i) and UCP 600 sub-article 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R900 / TA866rev", "PublishedID": "R900", "NonpublishedID": "TA866rev", "Description": "When collection instructions are sent to a bank and that bank releases the documents to the drawee without payment and contends that they have no expertise in international banking, that the documents were forwarded without their prior approval and that the drawee was in agreement with the drawer regarding payment, does such a bank remain liable under URC?", "RelatedArticles": "URC522 sub-articles 11 (a), (b) and (c), 1 (b), 1 (c), 4 (a) (i), 5 (d) and 10 (a)", "Rule": "URC 522", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R894 / TA867", "PublishedID": "R894", "NonpublishedID": "TA867", "Description": "When a factory acceptance test certificate is to be signed by one and/or another named signatory and the presented certificate is presented duly signed by both signatories but one is incomplete with regard to the entity on whose behalf he is signing, is the document discrepant?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R889 / TA868rev", "PublishedID": "R889", "NonpublishedID": "TA868rev", "Description": "Does a technical acceptance certificate comply when signed by the applicant but it contains reference to an item that was to be upgraded?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (f)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R895 / TA869rev", "PublishedID": "R895", "NonpublishedID": "TA869rev", "Description": "When a credit covers 400MT of goods +/- 10% and partial shipments are allowed, but only in 8 containers and 8 containers are shipped with a total of 352MT of goods is a second presentation complying?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R881 / TA842rev3", "PublishedID": "R881", "NonpublishedID": "TA842rev3", "Description": "When a credit requires all documents to be manually signed, does this include copies?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 681 paragraph 32, ISBP 745 paragraph A31 (b), ISBP 681 paragraph 62 and ISBP 745 paragraph C10", "Rule": "ISBP 681", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA758rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA758rev", "Description": "Whether reference in a packing list to “shipping date” necessarily relates to the date of loading on board of the goods on a named vessel at the port of loading as stated on the bill of lading", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA752rev3", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA752rev3", "Description": "Can a confirming bank decline to honour or negotiate under its undertaking when economic sanctions that are applicable to it by law or regulation specifically prohibit it from doing so? Does adding a 'sanction clause' to the confirmation relieve the confirming bank of its obligation under UCP 600 sub-article 15 (b) and article 8?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 15 (b); article 8", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA715", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA715", "Description": "Wording in a credit to the effect that the issuing bank will reimburse 'only upon receipt of documents at our counters constituting a complying presentation ... ' or similar such wording, does not modify the content of article 35 or the reimbursement undertaking that exists in sub-article 7 (c).", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 35; sub-article 7 (c)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R897 / TA865rev2", "PublishedID": "R897", "NonpublishedID": "TA865rev2", "Description": "Does a copy of a customs export declaration, which has been electronically generated, need to be signed when the credit, as amended, requires a copy and/or original of such document authenticated by the Customs Authorities?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraphs A31 (b) and A35 (d)", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R887 / TA870rev", "PublishedID": "R887", "NonpublishedID": "TA870rev", "Description": "Does the inclusion of payment terms within an invoice that are not fully in accord with the payment terms under the credit a reason to refuse the invoice? Invoice and packing list that refers to a tolerance in the quantity, where no quantity was stated in the credit. A certificate of analysis that included confidentiality and copyright provisions written in local language, when the credit stipulated ‘all documents must be written in English’.", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 14 (d) and 4 (a), and ISBP 745 paragraph A21 ", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R891 / TA871rev", "PublishedID": "R891", "NonpublishedID": "TA871rev", "Description": "When a draft is to be drawn on the nominated bank for acceptance at 30 days sight, but the nominated bank is not willing to act on its nomination until after the issuing bank has approved the documents, but the nominated bank does not tell the issuing bank this or the date the documents were received by it, what will be the maturity date – 30 days after the nominated bank received the documents or 30 days after the issuing bank accepted a waiver from the applicant?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c) and (d), ISBP 745 paragraphs B5 (b) (i) and (iii) and B5 (b) (ii)", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R896 / TA872", "PublishedID": "R896", "NonpublishedID": "TA872", "Description": "When a credit indicates that a tolerance applies to the total quantity, does this apply to the total and individual line items or just the total?", "RelatedArticles": "Miscellaneous", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R890 / TA873rev", "PublishedID": "R890", "NonpublishedID": "TA873rev", "Description": "When a credit indicates that typing errors not affecting figures are acceptable, does this include a model number of the goods? Did the refusal notice of the issuing bank comply with UCP 600 article 16 and wording that appeared in the credit?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 article 16, sub-article 18 (c), ISBP 745 paragraph C3, Preliminary Consideration (iv), and paragraphs A23, C5, C8 and UCP 600 sub-article 16 (c) (iii) (b)", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R893 / TA875rev", "PublishedID": "R893", "NonpublishedID": "TA875rev", "Description": "Does a different legal form of the beneficiary name constitute a discrepancy? When a goods quantity is rounded up or down, may a bank complete a mathematical calculation and refuse if there is a difference?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (i), ISBP 745 paragraphs C2 (a) and A22", "Rule": "UCP 600, ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R888 / TA876rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA876rev", "Description": "Beneficiary certificate indicating an incorrect letter of credit number", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-article 14 (d)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R898 / TA877", "PublishedID": "R898", "NonpublishedID": "TA877", "Description": "When a credit requires shipment to a specific port but that port is shown within the goods description area of the bill of lading, as the port of discharge, is this acceptable without mention of that port at least in the place of final destination or delivery field of the bill of lading?", "RelatedArticles": "ISBP 745 paragraph E8 (b)", "Rule": "ISBP 745", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "R892 / TA878rev", "PublishedID": "R892", "NonpublishedID": "TA878rev", "Description": "Is the issuing bank able to refuse documents based on a condition in a credit that can be considered as being non-documentary? Was the refusal notice of the issuing bank issued according to the requirements of article 16 and, if not, is the issuing bank precluded from claiming that the documents are discrepant?", "RelatedArticles": "UCP 600 sub-articles 16 (c) (ii), 16 (f), 16 (c) (i), 14 (h), 4 (a) and 14 (a)", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA879rev2", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA879rev2", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Miami - April 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA880rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA880rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Miami - April 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA881rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA881rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Miami - April 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA882rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA882rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Miami - April 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA883rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA883rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Miami - April 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA884rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA884rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Tbilisi - October 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA885rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA885rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Tbilisi -October 2018", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA886rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA886rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Beijing - April 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA887", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA887", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Beijing - April 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA888rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA888rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Beijing - April 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA889rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA889rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Beijing - April 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA890", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA890", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Beijing - April 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA891rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA891rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Paris - October 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA892rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA892rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Paris - October 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA893rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA893rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Paris - October 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA895rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA895rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Paris - October 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA896rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA896rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Paris - October 2019", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" } , { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA898rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA898rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Dubai - April 2020", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA899rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA899rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Dubai - April 2020", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA900rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA900rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Dubai - April 2020", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA901rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA901rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Dubai - April 2020", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA902", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA902", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - Dubai - April 2020", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA909rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA909rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - March 2021", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA910rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA910rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - March 2021", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA912rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA912rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - March 2021", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA913rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA913rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - March 2021", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" }, { "Year": "Unpublished", "Opinion": "TA914rev", "PublishedID": "", "NonpublishedID": "TA914rev", "Description": "ICC Banking Commission - March 2021", "RelatedArticles": "", "Rule": "UCP 600", "Link": "

" } ] }