Dear JSMITH . Thanks for yr early reply! Due to company ‘s stamp overlap signature and under stamp is name of master, I am not sure the signature is of master or of shipping company. So, I think this B/L can constitute a disc as “not identify who sgned B/L ” or “B/L not issued by Master”. I’m waitin...

Dear Sir/Madam
L/C require Charter Party B/L issued by Master.
.
The presented B/L shows a signature of the master (with name of master) and stamped by shipping company beside signature of master (but not show any capacity of this shipping company).
.
Is this a discrepancy?

Regards
AK

Dear Mr Duc,
"If the first shipment is short or not made within the given period, then the L/C would cease to be available for further drawings."
So, is it similar if the 1st shipment's over shipment?
Thanks for yr help
Best regards,
Unhu

Dear all, I would like to have yr opinions on the following case: L/C states : Field 44D shipment period: + For item 1: latest shipment date 111022 + For item 2: latest shipment date 111026 With the above mentioned requirement, can we check the docs base on article 32 Installment shipment ? In case ...

Dear All, I need to have some comments regarding the insurance policy presented under a credit subject to UCP600 Policy Details: Max. Limit of Liability: Usd284311,79 (for 110 pct of invoice value) Coinsurance: Coinsurers ABC Insurance co. %60 sum insured USD 170587,07 XYZ Insurance co. %40 sum insu...

Dear GLENNRANSIER, . I confirm that Invoice showed original signature of beneficiary. but issuing bank refused docs upon foundation a/f: . ICC Banking Commission Policy Statement, document 470/871 (Rev) titled The Determination of an 'original' Document in the context of UCP 500 sub-article 20b' sta...

LC calls for signed Commercial Invoice with Legalization by Chamber of Commerce in 1 Original and 1 Copy The Presented invoice is signed as well as Legalized and Title as Commercial Invoice, However the Issuing Bank have reject the same stating that "Original Invoice not presented only Certifie...

Dear Sir/Madam
.
If negotiating bank present certificate of quality in 03 originals i/o 02 originals and 02 copies as L/C required, is it considered as discrepant for refusing to pay??
.
Pls comment and give me any ICC opinion regarding this disc (if any)
.
Tks for your early reply!
Regards,
AK

dear Sir, From ICC Opinion R659, I understand that A doc issued in the format which there is no field for a place and/or date of issue is not disc if it does not contain a date of issuance. On the contrary, if B/L has mentioned the 'place and date of issue' field, is it obligated to fill in date of ...

Dear,
Tks for all yr reply. Because almost everyone assume it is not disc, I think issuing bank read them and was obligated to pay us. But, we reduced the 50pct inv amount.
We hope someone raise this case to ICC for offical opinion so that other banks will not be the same as us.
Best regards,
AK