Search found 20 matches

by ChantalDuguay
Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:23 pm
Forum: Trade Finance
Topic: Shippings marks
Replies: 0
Views: 4990

Shippings marks

Good day My colleagues and I can't seem to agree whether or not the document was discrepant so I would like your opinion on the matter: LC STATES UNDER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS: ''INSURANCE TO BE COVERED BY APPLICANT. BENEFICIARY SHALL ADVISE TO ABC COMPANY WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SHIPMENT ...
by ChantalDuguay
Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:39 pm
Forum: Trade Finance
Topic: Name of beneficiary
Replies: 0
Views: 4854

Name of beneficiary

We would like your opinion on the following: -LC STATES AS BENEFICIARY: ABC COMPANY -LICENSE SHOWS AS EXPORTER ABC COMPANY -CONTRACT SHOWS AS BEN ABC COMPANY AND IS SIGNED BY ABC COMPANY -UNDER REQUIRED DOCS: copy of the original commercial invoice signed by beneficiary for a value not exceeding the...
by ChantalDuguay
Thu Jul 27, 2017 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Certificate of Origin GSP Form A
Replies: 2
Views: 3798

Certificate of Origin GSP Form A

Mr. James My opinion is based on the information you provided. when reading your topic I immediately thought of article A17 of ISBP quote: "The fact that a document has a box, field or space for date to be inserted does not necessarily mean that such box, field or space is to be completed"...
by ChantalDuguay
Thu May 25, 2017 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Bill of lading with clause No direct overside discharge or d
Replies: 4
Views: 4968

Bill of lading with clause No direct overside discharge or d

thank you everyone for your response
by ChantalDuguay
Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Bill of lading with clause No direct overside discharge or d
Replies: 4
Views: 4968

Bill of lading with clause No direct overside discharge or d

Hello, I would like to have your opinion as to whether you would consider a bill of lading containing the following clause (on the front of the BL): 'No direct overside discharge or direct delivery' as discrepant or not. The LC did not indicate that such clause were not acceptable. The LC required t...
by ChantalDuguay
Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Article 9 (f)
Replies: 1
Views: 2249

Article 9 (f)

We would be curious to know how your bank treats non authenticated swift message (MT999) (article 9 f) a) How are they handled? Are they refused and the sender is asked to use a bank with which both sender and receiver have an agreement for transmitting/receiving authenticated message? b) If banks a...
by ChantalDuguay
Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Payment obligation
Replies: 2
Views: 2628

Payment obligation

I agree with your position. I would have the issuing bank amend the DC to read ''90 % of invoice value...'' instead of ''90 % of LC value...'' The term ''LC value'' as a different meaning than ''invoice value'' which would be more suited since partial shipment are allowed. I believe it is a case of ...
by ChantalDuguay
Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Article 38 j.
Replies: 8
Views: 5867

Article 38 j.

Thank you all for your input.
Regards
by ChantalDuguay
Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: MT745 under L/C confirm
Replies: 2
Views: 2054

MT745 under L/C confirm

Dear Phan If you refer to the S.W.I.F.T. Message reference Guide, category 7, a MT754 ''is used to advise the Receiver that documents were presented in accordance with the credit terms and are being forwarded as instructed.'' I would therefore consider this MT754 as meaning conform documents were pr...
by ChantalDuguay
Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Article 38 j.
Replies: 8
Views: 5867

Article 38 j.

After your last comment I see that my understanding was correct. So I go back to my first comment and ask how do you make it available with the second bene's bank
by modifying 41d