No, it's not required. If partial shipment is allowed, either X or Y or both country of origin will fulfill the given condition.
Regards
Ganesh
Search found 6 matches
- Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: various origins and partial shipments
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3103
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: issuer of B/L
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2992
issuer of B/L
It's not a discrepancy. LC calls for "full set B/Ls ............ signed by the shipping company or its agent" thru 46A. The requirement "charter party B/Ls are acceptable" in 47A is "in lieu" of the requirement in 46A. However, when a CP B/L is presented, it must be che...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Endorsement in a "to order" Insurance Document
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1767
Endorsement in a "to order" Insurance Document
Request Opinion on the below case LC calls for an Insurance Policy or Certificate in negotiable form and endorsed in blank Insurance Document presented shows "ASSURED - TO THE ORDER" without any mention of Applicant or Beneficiary name anywhere in the document. In this case who can endorse...
Incoterm
Letter of Credit issued in June 2013 is silent with regard to the Incoterm. Beneficiary Presented invoice showing Incoterms FOB 1990. In my opinion above is not a discrepancy as LC is silent on the Incoterms. Any comments from the members
ISBP
Yes, they are. Though not wide as they will be now.
ISBP
ISBP 745 release date is 20th June 2013. However, there's no implementation date as these are "practices" not "rules or guidelines". In one sense, the implementation date can be "1st July 2007", the day UCP600 came into effect, as these practices are there since then. [...