Search found 58 matches

by GerhardH
Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Fax number in different documents
Replies: 1
Views: 1799

Fax number in different documents

Dear all, I'd like to ask for your opinion concerning following case: Given details in the L/C: field 50: applicant name ... applicant P.O.Box and Street ... applicant city and country ... field 47a: 9. Documents consisting of 1/3 B/L, ....... should be dispatched to the following applicants address...
by GerhardH
Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Release of discrepant documents after L/C expiry - obligatio
Replies: 2
Views: 2739

Release of discrepant documents after L/C expiry - obligatio

I kindly ask you for your opinion to the following case: 1. Discrepant documents (discrepancy in the packing list) have been sent to the issuing bank, within L/C validity. 2. Documents have been refused by issuing bank according to UCP art. 16. 3. Later on (after expiry of the L/C !), documents have...
by GerhardH
Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:00 am
Forum: ISBP
Topic: Consignee in Certificate of Origin
Replies: 5
Views: 4631

Consignee in Certificate of Origin

Dear Jeremy and Duc,

thanks for your comments, but the essential information is, that NO transport document is required. Therefore we also assume that L5 of ISBP745 is not applicable.
Thanks again for your comments.
by GerhardH
Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:00 am
Forum: ISBP
Topic: Consignee in Certificate of Origin
Replies: 5
Views: 4631

Consignee in Certificate of Origin

Dear All, we had following discussion: L/C requires presentation of a Certificate of Origin by Chamber of Commerce (nothing else defined in the L/C. Now our customer requires to mention the enduser (which is not the applicant) as consignee in the Certificate of Origin. Nor is a transport document re...
by GerhardH
Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: acceptable to applicant
Replies: 6
Views: 4875

acceptable to applicant

Thanks for your comments.
Andy, I have one more question on your comment. Does this mean, for the first option (Retention Bond to bear a statement thereon that it has been issued in a form that is acceptable to the applicant) no countersignature of the applicant is needed?
Thanks again for your reply.
by GerhardH
Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: acceptable to applicant
Replies: 6
Views: 4875

acceptable to applicant

Dear all, a requirement in an L/C of a document to be "acceptable to applicant", does this mean, that the document must be countersigned by the applicant? Requirement in said L/C was: Presentation of a Retention Bond acceptable to applicant. We have presented a Document called "Retent...
by GerhardH
Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: date of issue of a FCR
Replies: 6
Views: 4980

date of issue of a FCR

Dear all, we received following discrepancy concerning FCR: -FCR not showing a date of issue or date of receipt of goods. As the L/C shows no further requirements concerning dates of issue of documents and FCR is to be checked as per article 14 (f), we argue, that the function of a FCR is fullfilled...
by GerhardH
Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Warehouse Receipt
Replies: 3
Views: 2605

Warehouse Receipt

Dear JSmith,
thanks for your explanation.
Some more informations:
-Beneficiary presented a Warehouse Receipt and the required declaration. Both issued by beneficiary.
-Warehouse receipt shows: "Warehouse area:Wallmann & Co., Hamburg."
by GerhardH
Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Warehouse Receipt
Replies: 3
Views: 2605

Warehouse Receipt

Dear all, L/C requires the following document: WAREHOUSE RECEIPT AND DECLARATION FROM BENEFICIARY THAT 14 DAYS HAVE PASSED SINCE THE GOODS REACHED THE PORT OF LOADING We have presented a document called "Warehouse Receipt" with following wording: "We herewith confirm storage of the go...
by GerhardH
Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: weight on AWB
Replies: 4
Views: 3018

weight on AWB

Dear All, following discrepancy was stated by confirming bank: AWB shows 9,4 kg, other documents show 9,460 kg. On AWB it is only possible to show the weight with one position after decimal point. Should therefore this discrepancy be rejected? In my opinion it is discrepant, because it is not rounde...