Search found 26 matches
- Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Whether a draft report need to indicate place of issue.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2489
Whether a draft report need to indicate place of issue.
Dear All I would like to seek your advice on a issue below. A L/C called for a draft survey report issued by an independent inspection company at the loading port. A draft survey report was presented indicating among other data, the loading port, the discharge port, survey commenced, certifying the ...
- Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: A clause about cargo condition in B/L
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1999
A clause about cargo condition in B/L
Dear All
i would to seek your advice on a case below.
' cargo condition as per pre-loading report ' was appeared on the main body of the B/L. But the said report was not presented.
Is it a discrepancy if the report is not submitted ? Any previous ICC opinions on this ?
Thank you.
Regards
Yat
i would to seek your advice on a case below.
' cargo condition as per pre-loading report ' was appeared on the main body of the B/L. But the said report was not presented.
Is it a discrepancy if the report is not submitted ? Any previous ICC opinions on this ?
Thank you.
Regards
Yat
- Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Goods description under a Standby L/C
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3702
Goods description under a Standby L/C
Hi Judith
If i were the issuing bank, i would not mark this as a discrepancy, for whatever reasons.
Rgds
Yat
If i were the issuing bank, i would not mark this as a discrepancy, for whatever reasons.
Rgds
Yat
- Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Art 14 (j)
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7601
Art 14 (j)
Thank you to all your comments.
Regards
Yat
Regards
Yat
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Art 14 (j)
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7601
Art 14 (j)
Dear JSmith
1st of all, thank you for your prompt reply.
2ndly, i agree that art.14(j) is not relevant to this query but so far, issuing bank has relied on this specific art to grind out unbelievable arguments to support their case which i failed to understand.
Regards
Yat
1st of all, thank you for your prompt reply.
2ndly, i agree that art.14(j) is not relevant to this query but so far, issuing bank has relied on this specific art to grind out unbelievable arguments to support their case which i failed to understand.
Regards
Yat
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Art 14 (j)
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7601
Art 14 (j)
Dear All I would like to seek your opinion on a case as follows. In the LC, B/L clause stated '..notify applicant with full address.' B/L presented with notifying party box indicating applicant name and address in full. But the issuing bank pointed out as a discrepancy : notify party in B/L not indi...
- Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: sub-Art 30(c) / ISBP para 60
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10497
sub-Art 30(c) / ISBP para 60
Hi All
to me, art 30c and para 66 are not applicable to this case, and it should be viewed under art.60 instead, so it is not a discrepancy.
Regards
Yat
[edited 6/30/2010 12:15:30 PM]
to me, art 30c and para 66 are not applicable to this case, and it should be viewed under art.60 instead, so it is not a discrepancy.
Regards
Yat
[edited 6/30/2010 12:15:30 PM]
art.18b
Hi Mojca and Daniel
You may want to refer to Frequently asked questions under UCP 600 -volume 1 and 2 by Collyer consulting.
Regards
Yat
[edited 5/14/2010 5:56:17 AM]
You may want to refer to Frequently asked questions under UCP 600 -volume 1 and 2 by Collyer consulting.
Regards
Yat
[edited 5/14/2010 5:56:17 AM]
- Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: ISBP 681E no.46(a) - due date fixed by drawee bank on compli
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7877
ISBP 681E no.46(a) - due date fixed by drawee bank on compli
Thanks again, Jeremy. I am sorry that i was not clear enough in my previous postings and had misunderstood you in certain extent. With due respect to your comment on last para, for usance drafts drawn on issuing bank at X days sight especially, i do believe 1. in view of ISBP no.46a, to avoid runnin...
- Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: ISBP 681E no.46(a) - due date fixed by drawee bank on compli
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7877
ISBP 681E no.46(a) - due date fixed by drawee bank on compli
Thank you all for your generous comments. I would like to share with you my little findings as follows. From Collyer Consulting, FAQ vol.1 and 2 says, ” negotiation is the purchase of a draft drawn on a bank other than the nominated bank (confirming bank). If drafts are drawn on the confirming bank ...