I have a question about Article 3, the portion about "a document may be signed by handwriting....:. What does may be signed by ...stamp" mean? Must it be a stamped version of a person's signature or could it be a "company stamp" with no persons signature?
Thanks
Search found 35 matches
- Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 3 UCP
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2254
- Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Payment obligation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2703
Payment obligation
Appreciate comments considering the following: -LC is confirmed -LC is available with the confirming bank by payment at sight -Confirming bank is authorized to reimburse themselves by TT at sight on their US office -LC allows partial shipments -It is a documentary LC not a standby -The LC states &qu...
Insurance
ISBP K9 states "an insurance document is not to indicate an expiry date for the presentation of any claims thereunder". As part of the pre-printed wording, the ins. cert. states as instructions to the assured "If the loss or damage is not apparent at the time of taking delivery, give ...
- Fri Oct 03, 2014 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: ISBP Article A8
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2140
ISBP Article A8
Original CP Bs/L were recalled from the confirming bank for correction of the notify party. The word "state" was omitted from the name and there was a typo in the street address. The corrections were made and the correction stamp was placed in the middle of the two corrections. The bank ag...
- Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: discrepancy or not
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12617
discrepancy or not
ok so back to my point. If I'm reading all this correctly, the "additional document" if called an addendum to BL no....would be acceptable.
- Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: discrepancy or not
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12617
discrepancy or not
Thanks Glenn I'll have a look
Best Regards John
Best Regards John
- Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: discrepancy or not
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12617
discrepancy or not
Thanks for your input
- Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: discrepancy or not
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12617
discrepancy or not
Thanks for your response.The letter is signed "signed on behalf of Master A. Bragais of M/T Songa Winds, S5 Agency World as Agents only". The BL is signed S5 Agency World as Agent for and on behalf of Master A Bragais of Songa Winds"
Would this change your opinion?
Thanks
Would this change your opinion?
Thanks
- Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: discrepancy or not
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12617
discrepancy or not
We presented documents under 6 separate Ls/C. It was a commingled shipment all on the same vessel. Each BL mentioned the usual commingling clause "this shipment was loaded aboard the vessel as part of one original lot of 4000.153 kilos with no segregation..." The discrepancy (for one LC an...
- Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: LC confirmation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1864
LC confirmation
Is LC confirmation a primary or a secondary obligation? I always thought primary. In discussion with a major international bank in NY, I was told otherwise. The details are way too much to go into. My basic questions are ; is confirmation a primary obligation of the confirming bank; is it on par wit...