Dear Jeremy,
Great line of thought – really valuable … thank you for sharing.
Best regards
Kim

Dear Jeremy,

He he – good one.

Since the “AS PER PURCHASE ORDER NO 2011/2017” is stated together with the requirement for the Packing List (I guess under “documents required”) – I would read it as a requirement to be mentioned on the Packing List.

Best regards
Kim

Di Daniel, Indeed I was not happy to drag out R648 :-) I was thinking about these two segments: Quote A bank that receives documents on a day when the mail receiving unit is working, but the trade department is not, may decide to acknowledge receipt of the documents, but on the basis that the docume...

I think that Jeremy is correct; see R648 / TA635rev Query 2.

Have a nice weekend.

Kim
www.remburs.com

I am a bit reluctant to ”open” this discussion, but I find it fair to add that there is no clear answer to this question. This issue has been discussed (!!) quite a lot – and the last statement from the ICC is the letter from Guy Sebban dated 23 October 2008 to “members and observers of ICC Commissi...

Dear Jeremy, That would not be for me to judge :-) I guess that I have a slightly different take on this: It may well be that people wiser than me have seen things that I have not seen – and perhaps want to “move” this to a better direction… perhaps even “preparing” for a fundamental change of this ...

I must admit that I spilled my coffee when I read this one. And I should add that I like coffee a lot – so altogether this did not leave me in a good mood …

Dear Bakhteyer, What is my opinion :-) Well hmm … my opinion is that it depends on how you look at it. Roughly speaking Don (and Glenn above) represents the view of the LC practitioner; i.e. what is intended in the UCP 600 – and how this is generally understood by the LC practitioner. Nesarul – I gu...

See also the article in the latest DCI (vol 16/No 3) by Nesarul Hoque: "Are there ambiguities in defining "Beneficiary" in UCP 600?" ... as well the comment by Donald Smith: "I see no ambiguity".

Best regards
Kim

Jeremy, Daniel and Albert,

I thank you so much for your responses. I have asked the issuing bank for clarification. If I receive answer – I will inform according through this channel

Have a nice weekend.

Kim