Hi Bogdan,
Thank you very much for your comment.

Best regards,
Phuong Lan

Dear Mr. Jeremy,

We greatly appreciate your sharing of time and knowledge on DC-Pro. We really got lots of information and we found your comments to be very useful. Thank you so much.

Wishing you a happy and healthy life after retirement.
Best Rgds,
Phuong Lan

I can not find the function of topic reply, pls help.

Thanks,
Phuong Lan

Hi, I seek your comments for the B/L signature as follows: + In the pre-printed field: Signed by: NYK LINE (VIETNAM) – HANOI OFFICE As agent for and on behalf of NIPPON YUSEN KAISHA (NYK LINE), AS CARRIER + Stamped by: NYK LINE VIETNAM AS AGENT FOR THE CARRIER NIPPON YUSEN KAISHA + The pre-printed f...

Hi Mr. N.H.Duc,

In this case the LC does not indicate the clause as “Unfair Letters of Credit” .

Thank you very much for your comment.

Is there any information relating to the above issue?

Best regards,
Lan

Hi, I do need comments from someone who knows about Bangladesh Laws relating to refusal of documents. We have received MT799 from the issuing bank with the content as follows: “PLS BE INFORMED THAT WE ARE OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE POLICY IMPOSED BY OUR CENTRAL BANK AS WELL AS THE PREV...

We are waiting for your expert comments.
Should we now send a message to refuse the discrepancies?

Phuong Lan

Thank Andy, Our case has become complicated when we were not prudent enough to contest the above mention discrepancies. We have just refused MT734 as per sub-article 16f UCP600 because we think although there is any valid discrepancy in MT734, the issuing bank must be responsible for their payment. ...

+We, negotiating bank, received MT734 from issuing bank in India with the content as follows: WE HEREBY INFORM YOU THAT THE APPLICANT HAS REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE DOCUMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. ALL DOCUMENTS ARE HAVING OVER WRITING AND FLUID MARKING IN DATES. 2. NO CORRECTIONS ARE AUTHORISED B...