Hi,
B/L is comply with article 19,
Search found 16 matches
- Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 19 a.iii (a)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7290
- Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Need Clarifications ..
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2554
Need Clarifications ..
And Regarding freight amount to be there on AWB.
INCOTERM is CFR, If am not wrong, beneficiary will pay only freight amount , hence mentioning prepaid amount would be acceptable.
INCOTERM is CFR, If am not wrong, beneficiary will pay only freight amount , hence mentioning prepaid amount would be acceptable.
- Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Need Clarifications ..
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2554
Need Clarifications ..
LC requirement : Insurance documents mention "claims payable in China", in the currency of Draft.
Presented Dox shows : "Claims payable in China", but did not mentioned in the currency of draft, but issued in the currency of the draft.
Presented Dox shows : "Claims payable in China", but did not mentioned in the currency of draft, but issued in the currency of the draft.
- Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Partial Shipment - FCR
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3324
Partial Shipment - FCR
Hi,
that para 105 talks about B/L, where as in this case FCR presented.
Pleae check and advice
that para 105 talks about B/L, where as in this case FCR presented.
Pleae check and advice
- Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Partial Shipment - FCR
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3324
Partial Shipment - FCR
Hello Experts, LC states : Partial Shipment prohibited Description : 2000 Qty of XYZ Bene has presented 2 FCR covering 1000 Qty in 1 FCR and 1000 in 2nd FCR. Both both the FCR shows same vessel name and same destination As FCR is not a transport document, therefore UCP article 31(b), will not be app...
- Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Need Clarifications ..
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2554
Need Clarifications ..
1.LC states AWB should mention freigh amount, presented AWB shows total prepaid as 2,162 USD - Issuing bank pick the disp as AWB omits to show freight amount. cant we consider prepaid amount as an freight amount 2.Insurance documents shows claims payable in USD, presented Insurance cert issued in US...
- Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Tolerance - Quick Help required
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3442
Tolerance - Quick Help required
Dear Daniel,
As per UCP article 30(b), +/-5% is allowed when qty is not measurable.
When bene shipped +5%, cant LC overdrawn.
Thanks.
As per UCP article 30(b), +/-5% is allowed when qty is not measurable.
When bene shipped +5%, cant LC overdrawn.
Thanks.
- Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Tolerance - Quick Help required
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3442
Tolerance - Quick Help required
Hi, We have received a presentation from beneficiary. Description : 250 MT for USD 100,000. Bene has presented the invoice for 260 MT for USD 100,400. As a negotiating bank, we found the documents comply. we have applied UCP article 30(b)., as the qty are MT. Issuing bank has rejected the dox statin...
- Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: POL differs from POR
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3185
POL differs from POR
Thank you so much KimChristensen,
I would appreciate you if could tell me funda behind this concept,why do you need an onboard notation evidencing Port of loading and actual vessel name.
I would appreciate you if could tell me funda behind this concept,why do you need an onboard notation evidencing Port of loading and actual vessel name.
- Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Issuer of Document
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3708
Issuer of Document
Glenn, if it could in this way ABC co ltd signing on behalf of XYZ.. will u accept it.