Having moved activities starting from the 1st October let me wish to all of you a "D/C" pro-rata greetings :
H A P . Y N . W Y . A R
Roland
Search found 115 matches
- Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Thank you all
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4419
Thank you all
Thanks to all of you for your wishes. All the best for you too.
Again, with thanks
Roland
Again, with thanks
Roland
- Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Thank you all
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4419
Thank you all
After 25 years of trade finance I'm now moving to another activity within the same bank, i.e. Banking Relations, which I like too. I would like to thank everybody for the exchange of ideas, support, fights, ....and the rest. In this world of constant move, I would say that the only regulars issues a...
- Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Amendment by MT799 (free format SWIFT)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9946
Amendment by MT799 (free format SWIFT)
Depend what has changed. Is it a rectification, changing the name of the reimbursing bank for ex., or is it an effective change, payable by deferred payment at 30 days instead of at sight for ex. If it falls under the second possibility I would like to see anywhere on the message the word "amen...
- Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 19 - 20
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6485
Article 19 - 20
Dear Kim,
Thanks again,...........and I will not annoy anymore on subject since I do fully agree with your thinking. Unfortunately, famous cases have demonstrate that applying good sense has not always been the best way to the right solution.
Byeeeee
Roland
Thanks again,...........and I will not annoy anymore on subject since I do fully agree with your thinking. Unfortunately, famous cases have demonstrate that applying good sense has not always been the best way to the right solution.
Byeeeee
Roland
- Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 19 - 20
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6485
Article 19 - 20
Dear Daniel and Kim, Thanks to both of you for those clarifications. Much probably we will adopt the wording proposed by Daniel indicating clearly that the document should apply to art. 19 or 20. Furthermore, point 44B, place of final destination, shown on issue 700 of a documentary credit should al...
- Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 19 - 20
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6485
Article 19 - 20
Kim
Thank you very much and apologize for my confusion. My question was much more referred to your point 1, i.e. how should the document be named when opening the L/C when same should apply to art. 19
Sorry and thanks again
Roland
Thank you very much and apologize for my confusion. My question was much more referred to your point 1, i.e. how should the document be named when opening the L/C when same should apply to art. 19
Sorry and thanks again
Roland
- Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: Article 19 - 20
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6485
Article 19 - 20
Both the articles are fine. However, how should the multimodal or combined transport document be indicated on the opening of the L/C ? Would the request of a multimodal transport document be enough, even without specifying in many exemplars same has to be presented since already mentioned in sub. ar...
- Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: commercial invoice
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6486
commercial invoice
to the participants, thanks to everybody for their participation. Now it's quite clear that only beneficiary may draw under the L/C. Maybe not formulated very clearly on my previous demand the draft must be drawn by beneficiary only. My question was however if draft must be issued by beneficiary onl...
- Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: UCP 600
- Topic: commercial invoice
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6486
commercial invoice
Jeremy,
Under a presentation of documents under a credit bearing the clause "third party documents acceptable" an invoice issued by another beneficiary mentioned in the credit would be acceptable but not the draft ?
Roland
Under a presentation of documents under a credit bearing the clause "third party documents acceptable" an invoice issued by another beneficiary mentioned in the credit would be acceptable but not the draft ?
Roland