Confirmation by second advising bank

General questions regarding UCP 600
Post Reply
Shahed
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:26 pm

Confirmation by second advising bank

Post by Shahed » Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:00 am

Bank A received a MT 710 from Bank B, which states "without our confirmation" in field 40B.

In field 49 of the L/C states "May Add".

Can the second advising bank , Bank A add its confirmation based on the wording in field 49? Or this instruction is only meant for Bank B, first advising bank?

Regards,

Shahed
RitaRicci
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:25 pm

Confirmation by second advising bank

Post by RitaRicci » Thu Feb 26, 2015 12:00 am

Hi Shahed,

As per the SWIFT usage rules, F49 contains instructions for the receiver of the M700. If the receiver of the MT700 does not add its confirmation, and there is a second advising bank, then the receiver (as first advising bank) will advise the LC through the second advising bank by MT710 stating "without adding our confirmation". This does not pass on or transfer the authority of "may add" to the second advising bank. The second advising bank is not the receiver of the issuing bank's MT700. FYI, in the futurre SWIFT changes a request was made to consider changing the usage rules to provide clearer indication of which bank is authorized to confirm.
With kind reagards, Rita
SladjanaSkakic
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:27 pm

Confirmation by second advising bank

Post by SladjanaSkakic » Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:00 am

Hi,

I would like to add the following: if the L/C is not available with Bank A or with any bank in bank A's country, then bank A is not nominated bank, i.e. is not nominated under UCP to add confirmation, not even "silent".

Br,
Sladjana Skakic
Post Reply