multi bills of lading

General Discussion
Post Reply
mohdk
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:22 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by mohdk » Thu Jun 07, 2001 1:00 am

we know that presenting more than one b/l consisting same vessel and same voyage and place of destination are not considered as partial shipment,but what
if the delivery term rquired was fob(x port),and one b/l was presented complying to that port,while another b/l
was presented showing port of loading was port y ,what will be the case then?
its not a partial shipment,but ports of loading were not complied with,do any one have other opinion?
PGauntlett
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:25 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by PGauntlett » Thu Jun 07, 2001 1:00 am

Looks discrepant to me. If l/c calls for FOB (X) a b/l showing loadport as (Y) will be inconsistent. I think that your question covers an unlikely scenario.
larryBacon
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:26 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by larryBacon » Fri Jun 08, 2001 1:00 am

Certainly if the L/C calls for shipment from port X & the B/L shows port Y, this is discrepant. In turn this forces the presentation to also be discrepant regarding part shipment, as documents presented for that part from port Y will not be taken into account due to the discrepancy.
Is it possible that the consignment from port Y was transhipped at port X ? If so, it should be comparatively easy to replace the current B/L with a compliant B/L.

Laurence A. J. Bacon
mohd_kkilany
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:27 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by mohd_kkilany » Fri Jun 08, 2001 1:00 am

what i meant here exactly was:how did ucp 500 allow loading from more than 1 port and getting more than 1 b/l as not patial shipment and compying if it was same vessel and same destination, provided that the delivery term was fob(x),while goods were loaded at port(x),then port(y) with 2 b/l , i think ucp is contradicting here.
PGauntlett
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:25 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by PGauntlett » Fri Jun 08, 2001 1:00 am

Not sure of the history but the l/c would have to allow e.g. shipment from UK port. If l/c states shipment from a particular place then that place must be stated as POD despite what you feel is implied by Art 40b.
T.O.Lee
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:28 pm

multi bills of lading

Post by T.O.Lee » Wed Jun 13, 2001 1:00 am

To make Article 40 (b) tick, which is used to cover commodity shipments where loading may be from different ports, the applicant should state in the LC application form either more than one specific port(s) of loading or simply state a broader range of ports of loading, such as "European Ports" or "North American Ports", "China Ports" and the like.

We are from www.tolee.com
Post Reply