Pls help me for this case:
LC stipulated:
+ Port of loading: any black sea port
+ Charter party B/L acceptable
Docs presented:
+ Charter party B/L show:
. "CLEAN SHIPPED ON BOARD."
. Port of loading: NOVOROSSIYSK, BLACK SEA PORT (in RUSSIA) but place of issuing B/L is HONGKONG, MMDDYYYY.
In my experience, they are usually in the same country.
Is there any problem/risk for the bank when received the above mention B/L (especially Charter party B/L)?
May the issuing bank regard the BL as non-complying?
Many thanks.
Best regards.
CHARTER PARTY B/L
CHARTER PARTY B/L
Dear KHANHLETU,
According to UCP600's article 14.l. a transport document may be issued by any party (and therefore in my opinion in any country) other than a carrier, owner, master or charterer provided that the transport document meets the requirements of relevant articles and article 22 particularly.
With regards,
According to UCP600's article 14.l. a transport document may be issued by any party (and therefore in my opinion in any country) other than a carrier, owner, master or charterer provided that the transport document meets the requirements of relevant articles and article 22 particularly.
With regards,
CHARTER PARTY B/L
MARATD, welcome to the DC-Pro discussion forum. I certainly do not want to discourage you from future postings but:
(1) I cannot see that 14(l) has any relevance.
(2) if a CPBL meets the requirements of Article 22 it will, by definition, be signed -and therefore issued by- by a party that is stated to be the master, owner or charterer (including where signed by a named agent for or on behalf of any of these parties). 14(l) is what many call ‘circular’.
KHANLETU, I am not aware of any UCP600 requirement that a BL must be issued in the port of loading and nor do I see why a BL should be issued in the POL. Therefore, I do not see any legitimate basis for refusal.
Regards, Jeremy
(1) I cannot see that 14(l) has any relevance.
(2) if a CPBL meets the requirements of Article 22 it will, by definition, be signed -and therefore issued by- by a party that is stated to be the master, owner or charterer (including where signed by a named agent for or on behalf of any of these parties). 14(l) is what many call ‘circular’.
KHANLETU, I am not aware of any UCP600 requirement that a BL must be issued in the port of loading and nor do I see why a BL should be issued in the POL. Therefore, I do not see any legitimate basis for refusal.
Regards, Jeremy
CHARTER PARTY B/L
For example, a big shipping company called Mediterranean Shipping Company is headquartered in Geneva and the b/ls are issued and signed in Geneva and usually not for vessels seafaring (Jeremy, is it correct?) from Geneva to Montreux.
Daniel
Daniel
CHARTER PARTY B/L
'Sailing' Daniel even though the vessel does not have any sails (voiles).
-
GlennRansier_
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:19 pm
CHARTER PARTY B/L
There is no discrepancy unless the LC itself prohibited this. The place of signing/issue is not relevant to the LC examination process but may be relevant to Government Sanctions/Regs. A carrier may issue a BL from of its offices.
CHARTER PARTY B/L
JSMITH.
I do not think that posting opinions can discourage anybody. I'm just trying to express my point of view.
I do not think that posting opinions can discourage anybody. I'm just trying to express my point of view.
-
HOANGTHIANHTHU_invalid
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:15 pm
CHARTER PARTY B/L
Not discrepant.
N.H.Duc
N.H.Duc