Bank A is requested to issue a guarantee to expiry up to Nov 15, 2011 against a counter-guarantee of Bank B to expire up to Dec 15, 2011.
While calculatting the commission of the guarantee, Bank A calculate the commission period up to Dec 15, 2011 (the validity of the counter-guarantee, not the validity of the local guarantee).
Do you think this is the right practice ?
Shahed
Guarantee Commission
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:18 pm
Guarantee Commission
Assuming that Bank A has issued it's local guarantee, it has committed to the beneficiary only until it the expiry date/period they provided in their guarantee. Generally they are only due a fee until that expiry. The counter-guarantee names Bank A as the beneficiary of the counter-guarantee and beneficiary's, as a standard banking practice are not entitled to collect fees. In short, Bank A should not be charging a fee until the expiry of the counter-guarantee.
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:15 pm
Guarantee Commission
Agreed with Glenn.
N.H.Duc
N.H.Duc
Guarantee Commission
We need to understand the basis for charging the commission is to compensate the issuer for its obligation. The guarantee issuer is entitled to charge commission up to the expiration of its obligation, not somebody else's obligation.
Rgds, Gabriel
Rgds, Gabriel
Guarantee Commission
However, many banks charge other banks per quarter or part thereof, so unless the counter-guarantee expiry takes the charging into a new quarterly period it is fairly academic anyway.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:17 pm
Guarantee Commission
Bank books contigent liability upto expiry of counter guarantee, it entitled bank to charges commission upto that date.