determination of transhipment a/to sub-article 23(d)(i)

General questions regarding UCP 500
larryBacon
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:26 pm

determination of transhipment a/to sub-article 23(d)(i)

Post by larryBacon » Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:00 am

Since these docs were relating to a credit permitting partial shipment, were they presented as one lot or two ?
If two, each presentation must be checked independent of the other and the issue of two B/L on the same ship does not arise.
If one presentation, refer to my earlier comments whereby it is not unusual for two carriers to have a carrier's interest in the same vessel.

The reference to "one and the same vessel" in Art. 23 d i concerns avoidance of transhipment and is not concerned with partial shipment.

Laurence
[edited 3/1/2005 3:15:35 PM]
NevinErtan
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:23 pm

determination of transhipment a/to sub-article 23(d)(i)

Post by NevinErtan » Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am

Hi again,

Laurence,
The documents were presented in one lot so the facts are:
- presentation in lot
- no partial shipment in the context of Art 40.b (whether such seperate b/ls issued by different carriers for the same journey should be, regardless of Art 40.b, considered as partial shipments is questionable.),
- both b/ls show transhipment effected in containers whereas l/c prohibited transhipment. Acceptable as per Art. 40.-d-i, if we don’t count “provided that the entire ocean carriage is covered by one and same bill of lading” part but can we??

Best regards,
larryBacon
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:26 pm

determination of transhipment a/to sub-article 23(d)(i)

Post by larryBacon » Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am

Nevin,

there are two separate issues which should not be mixed :

Art. 23 d i concerns transhipment (not art 40 d i in your last posting) and must be read in that context. This article allows transhipment provided there are not separate B/L issued for each part of the journey. This is what is meant by "the entire ocean carriage is covered by one and the same" B/L.

Partial shipments covered by Art. 40 b commences "Transport documents...". This is plural and indicates that more than one B/L can be issued for the same consignment without being regarded as partial shipment.

As an example, would you accept two B/L issued by the same agent with the same carrier and same vessel but different dates of loading ? Bear in mind that Art. 23 a ii will accept a date of loading on board in place of a date of shipment. This can easily happen even if the vessel only takes two hours to load -
1st B/L for goods loaded at 23.00 hours on day one;
2nd B/L for goods loaded at 01.00 hours on day two.

If you can accept two B/L in this case, it is only a small further step to accept two carriers.

Laurence
Post Reply