ICC Digital Library Forum

Jeremy,
UCP 600 has also omitted the possibility that a different place of receipt ( or a pre-carriage) from the port of loading stated on the transport doc or the practice outlined in para 80 of ISBP.

In such a case , there would be no UCP Art that you may refer to.

Regards,
Yahya

Yahya,

I am aware that UCP600 sub-Article 20(a) omits reference to a bill of lading indicating a place for receipt or taking in charge different from the port of loading. However, I do not agree that there is not a UCP600 article to refer to in such a situation. The relevant sub-Articles are sub-Articles 20(a)(ii) and (iii). Provided they are met the B/L is logically compliant.

Regards, Jeremy




[edited 2/27/2007 11:54:51 AM]

Jeremy,
I agree with you ,
Yes, you can refer to provisions that you mentioned.
But I consider that such omissions shall raise more different interpretations and you would have to give more explanations

Regards,
Yahya