Art 14 (j)

HOANGTHIANHTHU_invalid · Post by **HOANGTHIANHTHU_invalid** » Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:00 am

I agree with Jeremy. The discrepancy is not valid.

Regards,
Duc N.H

THI THUY MYT_ · Post by **THI THUY MYT_** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:00 am

Dear Jeremy and Daniel,
Tks for yr reply.
.
I have argued this problem with issuing bank. However, they still assume "applicant" must include name and address, contact detail which whole of imformation stated in Filed 50 of MT700 because F.50 is named "Applicant".
.
So, pls help me in explaining with them.
Tks and regards,
AK

DanielD · Post by **DanielD** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:00 am

AK,

I can hardly help you if I am not convinced myself. Who coud have thought that a definition of address would be needed.
I will think over it again
Regards
Daniel

ANH TUYETL · Post by **ANH TUYETL** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:00 am

I think the discrepancies in both cases given by JohnLim and AK are invalid for the reason:
- art14j stress that ''when'' (be reminded with the word ''when'') the address and contact details of the applicant appear as a part of consignee or notify party on a transport docs, they must be as stated in the credit. And clearly, there is no requirement that the address and contact details must appear, unless specifically required by the credit.
Regards

[edited 8/26/2010 10:37:07 AM]

JohnLim · Post by **JohnLim** » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:00 am

Thank you to all your comments.

Regards
Yat