When there is notation or stamp in the Multomodal transport documents, showing Shipped on Board, should it be required to put the date thereunder on which the goods have been loaded on Board.
Can i have your views please.
Shahed
Toronto, Canada
Article 19 of UCP
Article 19 of UCP
Shahed,
both 600's art.19 and isbp681's art.73 answer to your question.
in absence of a dated shipped on board notation, the date of issue of the document is to be considered as shipped on board/dispatch/taking in charge date.
your doc.doesn't need to bear a dated shipped on board notation.
regards,
bogdan
both 600's art.19 and isbp681's art.73 answer to your question.
in absence of a dated shipped on board notation, the date of issue of the document is to be considered as shipped on board/dispatch/taking in charge date.
your doc.doesn't need to bear a dated shipped on board notation.
regards,
bogdan
Article 19 of UCP
Thanks for your reply. My question was when a notation or stamp indicate the "shipped on Board" (as opposed to pre-printed wording) whether it ir required to put the date on which the goods have been loaded. Article 19 ii shows a stamp or notation indicating the date on which ..... which is different than UCP 500.
Shahed
Shahed
-
KimChristensen
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:21 pm
Article 19 of UCP
Dear Shahed,
I agree with Bogdan.
I am not sure I see any material difference between UCP 500 sub-article 26(a)(ii) and UCP 600 sub-article 19(a)(ii). The UCP 500 article mentions “such date” where the UCP 600 article says “a date”.
The basic requirement is that the document “indicate that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or shipped on board”.
Then the question is how this should be reflected in the documents; which could either be by “pre printed wording” or by “stamp or notation”.
The date is important in order to determine “shipment” for the purpose of e.g. UCP 600 sub-article 14(c). This means basically that if the “stamp or notations” includes a date – then that date is considered “shipment”. In other cases (as Bogdan mentions) the date of issuance will be deemed date of “shipment”.
This does in my view not imply that IF there is an inserted “shipped on board notation” – then that one should be specifically dated – and be the date of shipment.
In my view – if there is “only” the date of issuance then that is the date of shipment.
Best regards
Kim
I agree with Bogdan.
I am not sure I see any material difference between UCP 500 sub-article 26(a)(ii) and UCP 600 sub-article 19(a)(ii). The UCP 500 article mentions “such date” where the UCP 600 article says “a date”.
The basic requirement is that the document “indicate that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or shipped on board”.
Then the question is how this should be reflected in the documents; which could either be by “pre printed wording” or by “stamp or notation”.
The date is important in order to determine “shipment” for the purpose of e.g. UCP 600 sub-article 14(c). This means basically that if the “stamp or notations” includes a date – then that date is considered “shipment”. In other cases (as Bogdan mentions) the date of issuance will be deemed date of “shipment”.
This does in my view not imply that IF there is an inserted “shipped on board notation” – then that one should be specifically dated – and be the date of shipment.
In my view – if there is “only” the date of issuance then that is the date of shipment.
Best regards
Kim