Would you reject a marine B/L issued by :
'abc as agent for
the carrier OF xyz'
because of the word 'OF' inserted after the word 'carrier'?
B/L issuer ?
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:20 pm
B/L issuer ?
Have never come across this problem yet -- but then that's what makes doccredits interesting!
I must admit that this could be a problem -- XYZ does not seem to be the carrier, so the agent is signing for what appears to be an un-named carrier (who eventually might have subcontracted to effect the carriage on behalf of XYZ)
regards
Judith
I must admit that this could be a problem -- XYZ does not seem to be the carrier, so the agent is signing for what appears to be an un-named carrier (who eventually might have subcontracted to effect the carriage on behalf of XYZ)
regards
Judith
-
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:26 pm
B/L issuer ?
I agree with Judith. I suspect that this is a poor translation, as the only problem with this is the word "of".
Laurence
(greetings from Moscow)
Laurence
(greetings from Moscow)