Blank endorsement

General questions regarding UCP 600
Post Reply
jsheehan
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:20 pm

Blank endorsement

Post by jsheehan » Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:00 am

An LC requires full set of original charter party Bs/L issued to order of the shipper, blank endorsed. The shipper ommitted to blank endorse and the benef of the LC blank endorsed the Bs/L on behalf of the shipper. Based on point 123 of the ISBP we feel the endorsement is acceptable under the LC and no authorization from the shipper is required.
Would appreciate any comments.

Thanks
DanielD
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:16 pm

Blank endorsement

Post by DanielD » Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:00 am

In my opinion par. 123 does not allow to endorse B/L without authorization as it is the case here.
It happens that the relevant entity forgets to endorse. In that case we ask their authorization to do it and we specify when we endorse on their behalf: "as per valid power of attorney in our possession".
Daniel
Danielbapply
NigelHolt
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:24 pm

Blank endorsement

Post by NigelHolt » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:00 am

Simply as a general principle, if something is stated to be signed for and/or on behalf of another party (or as agent, proxy etc of that party), that other party being in law the 'principal', it must be considered as having been executed by the principal and not the agent for the purpose of facial compliance. Thus, the fact that it is the beneficiary that has apparently acted as agent here is immaterial; what matters is if on its face the endorsement has been signed by the principal's (the shipper in this case) agent. As a result, assuming this is the case, I have no doubt the endorsement is compliant.




[edited 12/16/2011 9:40:51 AM]
[edited 12/16/2011 9:41:49 AM]
jsheehan
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:20 pm

Blank endorsement

Post by jsheehan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:00 am

Thanks for the input
Post Reply