'In witness whereof, the undersigned, (on behalf of ABC Shipping Line Ltd.) the Master, has signed the …'
Singed
Master
M/V Toronto
We interpret this message to mean that the master signs on behalf of the ABC Shipping Line Ltd., which may not be the shipowners.
In practice it should be the local agent nominated by the shipowners at the port of loading to take care of the on-shore duties, such as providing refueling (bunker), provisions for the crew, fresh water replenishment, minor repairs and maintenance, performing port authority formalities, administratrive work, which, in the maritime world, are known as "husbanding" the ship (a "she" - a wife that needs a husband to take good care of her).
A MASTER IS AN AGENT OF THE SHIPOWNERS
From our understanding, a master is the agent of the shipowners, such as in German martime law. That is why most charter party bills of lading are signed by the master, as a legal representative of the shipowners. There should be only a few such charter party bills of lading to be signed for a charter party shipment where there are one main and a few sub charterers.
DISTRIBUTION OF WORK BETWEEN AGENT ON SHORE AND MASTER AT SEA
We do not see the reason why a company on shore at the port of loading should ask a busy master at sea to sign for the bills of lading. For one shipment, ther may be 3,000 bills of lading to be signed! A master has a lot of more important things to care about, such as seaworthiness and cargoworthiness than spending his valuable time in signing the 3,000 bills of lading which the agent on shore can do it more economically and efficiently.
From a shipping management point of view, we do not see the logic of such arrangement.
There are other reasons why the agent on shore should be the one to sign such bills of lading. However, we do realise that this is not a maritime discussion forum and it is more appropriate for us to stop right here.
http://www.tolee.com
[edited 10/23/01 6:08:43 PM]