Page 1 of 1
silent confirmation
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:00 am
by EsraA
Can you give some information about silent confirmation,since one of customers requests such a transaction and It is not commonly used,thus not well known.
Thank you
silent confirmation
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:00 am
by NigelHolt
Opinion R207, issue 2, has something to say on the matter.
silent confirmation
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:00 am
by POLTERD.
Dear Esra,silent confirmation means confirmation added by advising/negotiating bank at the special request of the bnf and without knowledge of the issuing bank, under a l/c that doesn't ask for l/c to be confirmed.
It is not a confirmation in a technical sense of the word. When adding a silent confirmation,the bank that acted so is not udner protection of UCP500 and cannot invoke,no matter what,the art.9b and 9d provisions.
You may say is more a guarantee to pay than a confirmation.
The risk covered relates only to the relationship between bnf and the bank that confirm so.
Bogdan
silent confirmation
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:00 am
by NigelHolt
Bogdan,
I would expect a nominated bank -per sub-Art. 10(b)(i)- that had given a ‘silent confirmation’ -the most common ‘silent confirmation’ occurrence in my experience- would be able to claim the rights of a nominated bank against an issuing and any confirming bank under sub-Art9(a)/(b) / sub-Art14(a). Such a 'confirmation' I would describe as a ‘documentary, bank & sovereign risk undertaking’. Obviously, the position is quite different when one is not a nominated bank and one is giving a ‘bank & sovereign risk (only) undertaking’.
Jeremy
[edited 9/11/2006 2:19:04 PM]