AWB as per art. 27 UCP 500
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:00 am
Hi all,
a L/C required AWB as per UCP art. 27 and was issued in order to that article.
The are also three field on AWB named as:
1) Issuing carriers agent name and city
2) agents IATA code
3) account no.
.
My question is, if field 1 is empty and only field 2 and field 3 are filled with numbers only, does this disqualify the AWB issued as per art. 27 of the UCP?
In case field 1 would be filled with the same name as the undersigning carrier, this would consitute a discrepancy, but would also consitute a discrepancy with filled fields 2 and 3 ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
best regards
GerhardH
a L/C required AWB as per UCP art. 27 and was issued in order to that article.
The are also three field on AWB named as:
1) Issuing carriers agent name and city
2) agents IATA code
3) account no.
.
My question is, if field 1 is empty and only field 2 and field 3 are filled with numbers only, does this disqualify the AWB issued as per art. 27 of the UCP?
In case field 1 would be filled with the same name as the undersigning carrier, this would consitute a discrepancy, but would also consitute a discrepancy with filled fields 2 and 3 ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
best regards
GerhardH