We all agree ISBP paragraph 22 can not be used directly to argue against the discrepancy and 'so far' we appear to agree that this is not a discrepancy.
Counter arguments would be also welcome as by counter points of view we advance our learning and understanding.
Svetlana
Svetlana
[edited 10/8/2009 4:15:38 PM]
Third party docs or not
-
SladjanaSkakic
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:27 pm
Third party docs or not
Thanks to all who found time to participate in this little discussion.
.
I hope it will be helpful for any readers who may find themselves in a similar situation to make his decision.
.
Sladjana
.
I hope it will be helpful for any readers who may find themselves in a similar situation to make his decision.
.
Sladjana
Third party docs or not
To my knowledge, the main reason for allowing third party shipper in the UCP, correct me if I am wrong, is that:
- either the benef could not be the effective supplier but just a middleman
- or the benef could not, for practical reasons, but delegate a third party (like for ex. a forwarder) to handle the shipment on his behalf.
I think the LC should be more explicit by not allowing any other name than the benef to appear as shipper on documents.
.
Regards
Antoine Samaha
- either the benef could not be the effective supplier but just a middleman
- or the benef could not, for practical reasons, but delegate a third party (like for ex. a forwarder) to handle the shipment on his behalf.
I think the LC should be more explicit by not allowing any other name than the benef to appear as shipper on documents.
.
Regards
Antoine Samaha