We would like to have yr opinion and relevant ICC opinion relating to the following issue:
Insurance Certificate signed by B&H company which is authorised by and on behalf of KA as authorised agent of EA Insurance Company
Does the insurance cert is acceptable as Article 28a UCP 600
Tks
Signature of insurance
-
PhanThanhNhan
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:23 pm
Signature of insurance
I wonder if R697 could help. In my opinion your case is disturbing but OK.
Daniel
Daniel
-
SladjanaSkakic
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:27 pm
Signature of insurance
If I understand correctly:
EA Comp. = Insurance Company;
KA Comp. = Authorized agent of Insurance Comp.;
B&H Comp. = ?
B&H Comp. acts on behalf of KA Comp., but I can not see in which capacity B&H Company acts and for that reason I should not accept the Insurance Certificate as signed in accordance with Art 28a.
[edited 4/9/2011 8:03:24 AM]
EA Comp. = Insurance Company;
KA Comp. = Authorized agent of Insurance Comp.;
B&H Comp. = ?
B&H Comp. acts on behalf of KA Comp., but I can not see in which capacity B&H Company acts and for that reason I should not accept the Insurance Certificate as signed in accordance with Art 28a.
[edited 4/9/2011 8:03:24 AM]