Hi,
May we have your comment on the below:
LC requires quality certificate to be issued by manufacturer whose name however is not stipulated by the LC.
The presented quality certificate is issued by a third party and not show any evidence that they are the manufacturer. Can we raise that this is a discrepancy ?
Many thanks for your kind feedback.
Regards,
ThuyPTB
Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer
-
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:15 pm
Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer
Hi,
It's a discrepancy.
IMHO the issuer must indicate his capacity as manufacturer as required by the LC.
Regards,
N.H.Duc
It's a discrepancy.
IMHO the issuer must indicate his capacity as manufacturer as required by the LC.
Regards,
N.H.Duc
Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer
many thanks,
ThuyPTB
ThuyPTB
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:19 pm
Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer
It really depends on what the document says. If it is titled a Manu. Cert. then that should be enough. If it is not titled or titled something different than Manu. Cert. but somehow reflects that they have created/built/manu., etc. the goods then it is not discrepant.