Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer

General questions regarding UCP 600
Post Reply
EMILYTRAN
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:19 pm

Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer

Post by EMILYTRAN » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:00 am

Hi,
May we have your comment on the below:

LC requires quality certificate to be issued by manufacturer whose name however is not stipulated by the LC.

The presented quality certificate is issued by a third party and not show any evidence that they are the manufacturer. Can we raise that this is a discrepancy ?

Many thanks for your kind feedback.
Regards,
ThuyPTB
HOANGTHIANHTHU_invalid
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:15 pm

Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer

Post by HOANGTHIANHTHU_invalid » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:00 am

Hi,

It's a discrepancy.
IMHO the issuer must indicate his capacity as manufacturer as required by the LC.

Regards,
N.H.Duc
EMILYTRAN
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:19 pm

Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer

Post by EMILYTRAN » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:00 am

many thanks,
ThuyPTB
GlennRansier_
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:19 pm

Whether the issuer must evidence itself as the manufacturer

Post by GlennRansier_ » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:00 am

It really depends on what the document says. If it is titled a Manu. Cert. then that should be enough. If it is not titled or titled something different than Manu. Cert. but somehow reflects that they have created/built/manu., etc. the goods then it is not discrepant.
Post Reply