Documentary Credit World

 

Feature

The ISP98 Effect

The International Standby Practices (ISP) system of standby practice encompasses not only the original standby itself, but also a host of other inter-related undertakings, including the confirmation, advice, nomination, amendment, transfer, acknowledgment of assignment of proceeds, and other similar agreements. This is captured in ISP98 Rule 1.04 (Effect of the Rules) which indicates to what undertaking its Rules are applicable and to whom its provisions apply. In this issue, the writing of Professor James E. Byrne provides further analysis and insights on Rule 1.04. Donald Smith, a member of the ISP98 Drafting Group, next revisits the formative years of ISP98, its journey to adoption, and the enduring impact of the Rules. David Meynell and Gary Collyer, both pivotal members of the ICC Working Group for the development of ISP98, then follow with their perspectives on the forwardthinking stance taken by ISP98 as regards its adaptability to technological advancements. They point out that ISP98 was among the first set of trade rules to recognise and make provisions for electronic presentations, a move that was quite progressive at the time of its drafting. This approach ensured that ISP98 was wellplaced for the future and remains apparent even today as technology is continually introduced, tested, and evolves in the area of trade finance.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Government Report
  • Litigation Digest
  • Articles
  • Information Digest
  • Scam Survey

 

Feature

25th Anniversary Year of ISP98

by Professor James E. BYRNE

The International Standby Practices (ISP) was developed under the auspices of the Institute of International Banking Law & Practice and became effective on 1 January 1999. The current version, which is the first, is abbreviated “ISP98” and has been endorsed by the International Chamber of Commerce (designated as ICC Publication No. 590) and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. It articulates standard international standby letter of credit practice. ISP98 was drafted as a unified and systematic whole. It was designed not only for bankers who already knew the practices being articulated, but also for lawyers and corporate users who may not be intimately familiar with them. ISP Model Forms have since been developed to increase the adoption and ease of use of the rules.

In this issue marking 25 years since ISP98 entered into force, DCW publishes previously unreleased analysis and insights on ISP98 Rule 1.02 by Professor James E. Byrne that was written over the period of multiple years up to his passing in July 2018. Trade finance consultant Pavel Andrle then offers his perspectives on the expanded use of standbys and increased reliance on ISP98 over the past 25 years and also his thoughts on the future of the rules.

DCW issues throughout this year will contain additional writing of Professor Byrne on aspects of the rules as well as reflections from specialists around the world who have closely monitored the development of ISP98 usage.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Litigation Digest
  • Conference Report
  • Information Digest
  • Scam Survey

 

Feature

Silent Confirmation of Documentary Credits

by Zahoor DATTU

Banks have been issuing so-called silent confirmations for decades. When an issuing bank does not request or authorize an advising or nominated bank to add its confirmation, but the beneficiary desires an undertaking from its bank, it may ask for a “silent confirmation”. The concept falls outside the framework of UCP. As a result, the approaches taken by banks in crafting agreements when engaging in silent confirmations can differ. The countries where silent confirmations are most common and frequency of practice has also varied. When done properly and with adequate care, silent confirmations represent a valuable and useful tool to facilitate international trade. Drawing on his knowledge of the industry, Zahoor Dattu explores the subject, including benefits to the beneficiary, compliance considerations, key factors for a silent confirmer, wording of a silent confirmation agreement, and execution of undertaking.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Conference Report
  • Litigation Digest
  • Articles
  • LC Statistics
  • Information Digest
  • Scam Surveys

 

Feature

Overview of Electronic Transferable Records and Trade Finance Digitalization Practice in China

by Jun XU

Digital transition in trade and trade finance has gained unprecedented attention over the past three years and great efforts have been made by international organizations, states, and industries to raise the profile of digital mechanisms in trade and trade finance. However, trade digitalization is advancing slower than expected. In this article, Jun Xu addresses the current status of trade finance digitalization in China and beyond, focusing attention on reasons why electronic bills of lading are not widely used in LC and collection transactions. Xu then examines the environment for other electronic transferable records, including use in supply chain finance, and the treatment of electronic insurance documents. Ultimately, greater strides need to be made not only in achieving legislative reforms in most countries regarding electronic transferable records and broader adoption of MLETR, but also in adjusting practice rules to better accommodate electronic presentations.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Conference Report
  • Litigation Digest
  • Articles
  • Scam Surveys

Feature

Celestial Aviation: UK Regulation 28 and the Confirmer’s Obligation

by Roger FAYERS

Celestial Aviation Services Ltd. v. UniCredit Bank, London Branch, decided by the English commercial court earlier this year, will be heard by the court of appeal. In advance of this judgment anticipated sometime in the coming year, Roger Fayers shines light on one issue of the case concerning application of UK Regulation 28 pertaining to financial services and funds relating to restricted goods and technology, in this case, aircraft leases. Specifically, Fayers confronts the question whether or not this regulation renders illegal the payment by UniCredit Bank of demands made under standby letters of credit which the bank confirmed. Fayers first identifies key dates and definitions of the case and relevant wording of the Regulation. He then sets out the judge’s approach and conclusions as regards the Regulation before considering English law and how he thinks it applies in this case. He goes on to analyze the pertinent wording of Regulation 28(3) as relates to the standby and, in particular, to when UniCredit’s obligation to pay Celestial arose. Drawing on the findings of other cases on exceptions to the autonomy principle, Fayers then offers his comments why he sees the issues differently from the judge.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Interview
  • Litigation Digest
  • Articles
  • LC Statistics
  • Information Digest
  • Scam Surveys

Feature

UK Digitalisation of Trade
New Law on Electronic Trade Documents

by Dr. Anna - Mari ANTONIOU

On 20 September 2023, the UK Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023 will enter into force. The Act provides legal status to electronic trade documents by making them equivalent to paper trade documents. In her analysis of the Act, Dr. Anna - Mari Antoniou examines what the Act does, why it is important, what it means in practice, perceived limitations, and previews the future under the Act. Many trade specialists are optimistic that the Act will usher in an era where electronic trade becomes commonplace, but the Act can only serve as an enabler for such practice. Consenting parties still need to agree to engage in electronic trade transactions. The issue now is whether implementation of the Act will inspire confidence among the stakeholders involved in trade to utilize electronic trade documents. The Act can facilitate; will electronic trade transactions flow?

After Dr. Antoniou’s article, the full text of the UK Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023 follows.

Read More

  • Updates
  • Litigation Digest
  • Articles
  • Forms
  • Conference Report
  • Information Digest
  • Scam Surveys


IIBLP is not responsible for any errors, inaccuracies, omission or incorrect information (or the consequences thereto) contained with the magazine or online; readers should not rely on any information contained in the magazine as providing legal, account or other professional advice. Readers should always consult with an appropriate professional for guidance.

IIBLP accepts no responsibility for the consequences of error or for any loss or damages suffered by readers of any of the information or materials appearing in DCW. The content or opinions contained in DCW do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of IIBLP, nor the organizations with which the author is affiliated. Copyright 2023 by IIBLP. All Rights Reserved.