Forgot your password?
Please enter your email & we will send your password to you:
My Account:
ISP98 Rule 1.04: Effect of the Rules
Unless the context otherwise requires, or unless expressly modified or excluded, these Rules apply as terms and conditions incorporated into a standby, confirmation, advice, nomination, amendment, transfer, request for issuance, or other agreement of:
1. Generally. Rule 1.04 indicates to what and to whom its provisions apply with respect to a standby issued subject to ISP98. The ISP98 system of standby credit practice encompasses not only the original standby itself, but also a host of other inter-related undertakings, including the confirmation, advice, amendment, transfer, acknowledgment of assignment of proceeds, and other similar undertakings. By having been undertaken in relation to a standby subject to these Rules, these related undertakings also become governed by ISP98 except to the extent expressly modified or excluded in the undertaking. It can also affect a number of persons besides the issuer and beneficiary. These other persons include any confirmer, any advisor, a nominated person who elects to act, and an applicant who has authorised the issuance of the standby or otherwise agreed to its application.
2. Background of Rule 1.04. Rule 1.04 was intended to identify the scope of application of ISP98 with more precision than had been the case with various iterations of the UCP. It had been left to guess whether and to what extent practice rules applied to persons who were affected by the standby but who did not expressly agree to their application. The principal underlying Rule 1.04 is that a person who acted under an ISP98 standby was bound by its rules except where varied, as were their undertakings. This approach is complicated by the existence of collateral agreements which may supplement the provisions of ISP98 as between the parties. This situation is most common with respect to the relationship between the applicant and the issuer but can affect any of the relationships indicated as well as the undertakings or agreements involved.
3. These Rules; Rules. Rule 1.04 refers to “Rules”. The word “Rule” or “Rules” is used in three senses in ISP98. The word “Rule” in both singular and plural were deliberately chosen instead of the word “article” or its variations in order to avoid confusion with other practice rules which use the word “Article”.
In the sense used in Rule 1.04, “These Rules” refers to the entire ISP98. Second, as provided in the caption “Rule 1: General Provisions” and other similar headings, it is the title used for each unit of ISP98, including various related subunits. Third, it has been used in the singular (“Rule”) in The Official Commentary on the International Standby Practices and generally from the outset, although not formally in ISP98 itself, as the name of each of the subunits which are not titled “subrules” to avoid confusion in light of the second usage. Hence, ISP98 Rule 1: General Provisions consists of Rule 1.01 through Rule 1.11 inclusive.
4. Terms and Conditions Incorporated. The text of Rule 1.04 provides that “these Rules apply as terms and conditions” to the standby, and other undertakings and respective agreements. This statement is intended to signal that the provisions of ISP98 are to be read as if they were part of the text of the standby except to the extent that they are varied or excluded. While the drafters of ISP98 were mindful of the fact that effective incorporation of standard terms and conditions is an issue for applicable law and not practice rules, the formulation of this rule was intended to provide guidance to courts and arbitral tribunals as to how ISP98 should be interpreted, namely as becoming an integral part of the standby, and other undertaking or agreements to which it relates. Importantly, the incorporation of ISP98 as terms and conditions should signal the intention to apply, and abide by, standard standby practice as formulated in these Rules.
5. Standby; Amendment; Confirmation. Rule 1.04 states that its rules apply as provisions incorporated into the standby unless expressly varied. In this Rule, the word “standby” is used in the sense of an undertaking issued subject to ISP98 as indicated in Rule 1.11(b) (Interpretation of these Rules).1 The undertaking may be named “letter of credit”, “bond”, “(first demand) (bank) (abstract) (independent) guarantee”, or the like.2 It would also apply to a counter standby.3
Whether the term “standby” includes an “amendment” is more complicated. It would include an automatic amendment, and a proposed amendment that has received the consent of the beneficiary.4 Whether the use of the term “standby” includes a proposed amendment depends on the context and the person whose obligation or rights are being discussed.
The word “standby” also includes “confirmation” as implied in Rule 1.11(c)(i) (Interpretation of these Rules)5 and as stated in ISP98 Official Interpretation 1.11:01 (February 2018) (The term “standby” also includes “confirmation” unless the context requires otherwise).
6. To What Undertaking Applicable.
7. Persons Affected by the Rules. As indicated in this Rule, a standby issued subject to these Rules affects not only the issuer and beneficiary who uses the standby but also any advisor, confirmer, or any other person who agrees to act or does act within the scope of a nomination in the standby.
8. Unless the Context Otherwise Requires or Unless Expressly Modified or Excluded; Variation. The provisions of Rule 1.04 can be varied, that is modified or excluded, by the terms of the standby as is provided in Rule 1.01(c) (Scope and Application).16 Any variation, however, should be considered carefully so as to avoid unintended consequences.17
It is conceivable that the issuer of an undertaking or the parties to the agreement may wish to vary provisions of ISP98. However, variation of Rule 1.04 would render ISP98 inapplicable or considerably alter the manner in which it is applicable. In such a situation, it may be wondered what effect this provision would have on the related undertakings and what is the point of the standby having been issued subject to ISP98.
1Rule 1.11(b) (Interpretation of these Rules) states: “In these Rules, “standby letter of credit” refers to the type of independent undertaking for which these Rules were intended, whereas “standby” refers to an undertaking subjected to these Rules.”
2 See TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd. [2003] EWHC 762 (TCC) [England] (performance bond made subject to ISP98, evidencing parties’ intention to establish an independent undertaking), abstracted in 2004 ANNUAL SURVEY OF LETTER OF CREDIT LAW & PRACTICE at 335.
3 See Rule 4.21 (Request to Issue a Separate Undertaking). Unless it is independent, “standby” would not apply to a local undertaking.
4 See Rule 2.06 (When an Amendment is Authorised and Binding).
5 Rule 1.11(c)(i) (Interpretation of these Rules) states: “Unless the context otherwise requires: i. “Issuer” includes a “confirmer” as if the confirmer were a separate issuer and its confirmation were a separate standby issued for the account of the issuer”.
6 Rule 2.01(d) (Undertaking to Honour by Issuer and Any Confirmer to Beneficiary) states: “i. A confirmer undertakes to honour a complying presentation made to it by paying the amount demanded of it at sight or, if the standby so states, by another method of honour consistent with the issuer ’s undertaking. ii. If the confirmation permits presentation to the issuer, then the confirmer undertakes also to honour upon the issuer ’s wrongful dishonour by performing as if the presentation had been made to the confirmer. iii. If the standby permits presentation to the confirmer, then the issuer undertakes also to honour upon the confirmer ’s wrongful dishonour by performing as if the presentation had been made to the issuer.”
7 Rule 2.05 (Advice of Standby or Amendment) states: “a. Unless an advice states otherwise, it signifies that: i. the advisor has checked the apparent authenticity of the advised message in accordance with standard letter of credit practice; and ii. the advice accurately reflects what has been received. b. A person who is requested to advise a standby and decides not to do so should notify the requesting party.”
8 Rule 2.04 (Nomination) states: “a. A standby may nominate a person to advise, receive a presentation, effect a transfer, confirm, pay, negotiate, incur a deferred payment obligation, or accept a draft. b. Nomination does not obligate the nominated person to act except to the extent that the nominated person undertakes to act. c. A nominated person is not authorised to bind the person making the nomination.”
9 Rule 2.06(b) (When an Amendment is Authorised and Binding) states: “b. If there is no provision for automatic amendment, an amendment binds: i. the issuer when it leaves the issuer ’s control; and ii. the confirmer when it leaves the confirmer ’s control, unless the confirmer indicates that it does not confirm the amendment.”
10 The term “issuer” appears in SWIFT MT 760 (2019 RELEASE) Sequence B Field 52a (Issuer) and is mandatory. It is defined as “the party that issues the undertaking…” For an explanation of the SWIFT (2019 RELEASE), see the introduction to this Official Commentary.
11 Rule 1.09(a) (Defined Terms: Definitions) “Beneficiary” is defined as “a named person who is entitled to draw under a standby”.
12 Rule 2.05 (Advice of Standby or Amendment) states: “a. Unless an advice states otherwise, it signifies that: i. the advisor has checked the apparent authenticity of the advised message in accordance with standard letter of credit practice; and ii. the advice accurately reflects what has been received. b. A person who is requested to advise a standby and decides not to do so should notify the requesting party.”
13 Under Rule 1.09(a) (Defined Terms: Definitions), “Confirmer” is defined as “a person who, upon an issuer ’s nomination to do so, adds to the issuer ’s undertaking its own undertaking to honour a standby.”.
14 Rule 8.01(c) (Right to Reimbursement) states: “This Rule supplements any applicable agreement, course of dealing, practice, custom or usage providing for reimbursement or indemnification on lesser or other grounds.”
15 Rule 6.07(b) (Request for Acknowledgement) states: “If an assignment is acknowledged: i. the acknowledgment confers no rights with respect to the standby to the assignee who is only entitled to the proceeds assigned, if any, and whose rights may be affected by amendment or cancellation; and ii. the rights of the assignee are subject to: (a) the existence of any net proceeds payable to the beneficiary by the person making the acknowledgment; (b) rights of nominated persons and transferee beneficiaries; (c) rights of other acknowledged assignees; and (d) any other rights or interests that may have priority under applicable law.”
16 Rule 1.01(c) (Scope and Application) states: “An undertaking subject to these Rules may expressly modify or exclude their application.”
17 See, for example, the Australian case Griffin Energy Grp. Pty Ltd. v. ICICI Bank Ltd. [2015] NSWSC 87 [Australia], summarised in 2016 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE at 374, in which three ISP98 standbys for AUD 150 million redefined the ISP98 definition of “banking day” and which resulted in problems for the beneficiary when the expiration date fell on a non-banking day and a required draft was not able to be executed by the deadline in the standby. This drafting exercise resulted in a legal malpractice action against the law firm that drafted the standby in Griffin Energy Group Pty. Ltd. v. Laughland [2016] NSWSC 1057 [Australia], summarised in 2017 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE at 508.