Search found 27 matches

by AndyHunt
Thu May 25, 2017 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Decline nomination
Replies: 2
Views: 4046

Decline nomination

Shahed You are being far too vague here. I assume you have a case in mind. A bank declining its nomination is not obligated to explain itself noting of course that if a bank has already either confirmed that credit or otherwise expressly committed itself to act outside of confirmation as recognised ...
by AndyHunt
Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: The application of paragraph A3 ISBP745
Replies: 1
Views: 1894

The application of paragraph A3 ISBP745

I would value the opinion of members on the following point. Paragraph A3 ISBP745 requires statements to be signed and this is expanded on by paragraph A5 ISBP745. Therefore if a credit, not uncommonly, were to require presentation of 'Packing list stating that the goods are packed in five cartons' ...
by AndyHunt
Wed May 18, 2016 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Insurance document
Replies: 2
Views: 2437

Insurance document

Refer paragraph A38 in conjunction with this.
Andy
by AndyHunt
Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Mathematical calculations
Replies: 1
Views: 1916

Mathematical calculations

There is no obligation for you to check any calculations. It all depends on how you view your relationship with your customer and how far you want to go in supporting that relationship. Personally I think you are creating a rod for your own back by doing this unless it is a simple couple of calculat...
by AndyHunt
Sun Apr 10, 2016 1:00 am
Forum: General
Topic: LC Number and Date
Replies: 1
Views: 2762

LC Number and Date

I assume the basis of your argument is that the credit should ideally have stated that the invoice should evidence 'LC number and LC date'.
Have you ever seen a credit issued like that?
The context is clear in that the date required is the LC date.
Andy
by AndyHunt
Fri Nov 07, 2014 12:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Art. 20a UCP 600
Replies: 1
Views: 1970

Art. 20a UCP 600

If I have surmised correctly you have bill of lading with a dated on board notation which shows the port of loading in accordance with the credit terms but with an asterisk next to the vessel name linking that box to a statement 'intention to load at.....on vessel......'. In my opinion you have to e...
by AndyHunt
Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: ISBP Article A8
Replies: 1
Views: 2114

ISBP Article A8

The question posed has the potential to divide respondents, especially given that I cannot recall any published opinion on this subject. Therefore, whilst I might sympathise with your predicament, I do feel we need to fall back on the precise wording of paragraph A8. That paragraph does not distingu...
by AndyHunt
Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Release of discrepant documents after L/C expiry - obligatio
Replies: 2
Views: 2739

Release of discrepant documents after L/C expiry - obligatio

Gerhard I cannot see any grounds on which they could avoid responsibility for payment. Doubtless the presentation schedule contained clear instructions that the documents were sent under the protection of the credit and that they were only to be released against payment. Therefore, even if it was fe...
by AndyHunt
Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:00 am
Forum: UCP 600
Topic: Jeremy Smith's Last Hurrah!
Replies: 3
Views: 2966

Jeremy Smith's Last Hurrah!

Many of you will have benefitted over the years from the pearls of wisdom that Jeremy has offered to questions raised on DC-PRO. At the end of August, Jeremy will retire from Lloyds Bank and I thought it would be nice to seek your comments and present them to him on his last day. Please note Jeremy ...