Forgot your password?
Please enter your email & we will send your password to you:
My Account:
Copyright © International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). All rights reserved. ( Source of the document: ICC Digital Library )
2017 LC CASE SUMMARIES Higher People’s Court of Liaoning Province; (2014) L. L. Y. M. Z. Zi No.5
Higher People’s Court of Liaoning Province
(2014) L. L. Y. M. Z. Zi No.5
Provided by JIN Saibo, Beijing Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm
Parties:
Procedural History: The trial court decided the court had jurisdiction on this case, the defendant appealed.
Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant had dispute on the L/G. The plaintiff thought the defendant was fraud in L/G, and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit to the trial court. Meanwhile, the ICC had accepted and heard the case.
Legal Issue(s): Whether the court has the jurisdiction on the dispute of the L/G, even though parties agreed to solve the dispute of the contract via arbitration?
Legal Rule(s): Art.170(1), Civil Procedure Law, After trying a case on appeal, the people’s court of second instance shall, in the light of the following situations, dispose of it accordingly:
If the facts were clearly ascertained and the law was correctly applied in the original judgment shall be affirmed.
Disposition – for each legal issue: The court affirmed the court had jurisdiction on this case.
Holding & Reasoning for each issue: This case was about an independent L/G, since the L/G was separated from the contract. And the plaintiff thought the defendant infringed the plaintiff’s right, this case was a tort case. Intermediate People’s Court of Shenyang has jurisdiction on this case according to law.
Article
COPYRIGHT OF THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE
The views expressed in this Case Summary are those of the Institute of International Banking Law and Practice and not necessarily those of the ICC or Coastline Solutions.