Forgot your password?
Please enter your email & we will send your password to you:
My Account:
Copyright © International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). All rights reserved. ( Source of the document: ICC Digital Library )
2007 LC CASE SUMMARIES 2007 NY Slip Op 52190U (N.Y.Ct.Cl. Sept. 25, 2007) [USA]
Topics: Contract to Provide LC, Return of LC
Article
Note: Tiger Security Group, Inc. (Contractor) contracted with the State of New York (State) to provide unarmed security services at the offices of the Department of Motor Vehicles. As a part of Contractor's agreement, Contractor/Applicant was required to provide a letter of credit in the amount of US$300,000 in favor of State/Beneficiary, but Contractor/Applicant provided an LC in the amount of only US$30,000. Cotnractor/Applicant failed to fulfill its contractual obligations to the satisfaction of the State, resulting in a termination of the contract in accordance with the termination clause contained in the hiring contract. After termination, State/ Beneficiary returned the LC.
Contractor/Applicant sued State/Beneficiary for balance due for services rendered; State counterclaimed for the return of payments previously made to Contractor/Applicant for services rendered. The Court of Claims of New York, McCarthy, J., entered judgment for Contractor/Applicant and dismissed the State/Beneficiary's affirmative defense.
One of State/Beneficiary's claims was that the failure to provide the contractually-required LC constituted a material breach of contract and warranted non-performance of the financial obligations to Contractor/Applicant. The court stated that State/Beneficiary had discretion with respect to the LC requirement of the contract, and the LC only served to protect the state against potential financial damages. Since the State/Beneficiary returned the LC after the contract was terminated, reflecting that it was no longer needed, and the record did not show any damages resulting from Contractor/Applicant's failure to comply with the contract, the court found that the failure to provide a contractually required LC did not constitute a material breach when the parties did not consider the failure to be a material breach.
[JEB/gsp]
COPYRIGHT OF THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE
The views expressed in this Case Summary are those of the Institute of International Banking Law and Practice and not necessarily those of ICC or the other partners in DC-PRO.