Forgot your password?
Please enter your email & we will send your password to you:
My Account:
Copyright © International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). All rights reserved. ( Source of the document: ICC Digital Library )
2011 LC CASE SUMMARIES Civil Action No. 5:09-380-KKC (E.D. Ky. Central Div. April 4, 2011) [USA]
Topic: Replacement of LCs
Article
Prior History: MW Mapleleaf Partners, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc., No. 5:09-CV-380-KKC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135728 (E.D. Ky. Central Div. Dec. 6, 2010) [USA], noted in 2011 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE 533
MW Mapleleaf Partners, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc.
Note: After Fifth Third Bank, Inc. (Issuer) issued LCs totaling US$38,162 on behalf of MW Mapleleaf Partners, LLC (Applicant) in favor of the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government in order to obtain an occupancy certificate for a newly constructed building, a dispute with Issuer arose and a settlement agreement resulted by which Applicant was required to replace Issuer's outstanding standby LCs. When Applicant failed to replace its standbys, Issuer moved to enforce the agreement and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Wier, Magistrate J., ordered Applicant to replace the LCs in order to eliminate Issuer's liability and to deed Applicant's property to Issuer.
Although Applicant deeded property to Issuer, it failed to replace the LCs claiming that it was unable to obtain other standby LCs because, having deeded the property, it had no assets. Instead, Applicant moved to amend the settlement agreement.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Caldwell, J., denied Applicant=s motion and amended the order enforcing the settlement agreement to state that Applicant must either replace the LCs or otherwise arrange for Issuer to be completely released from all liabilities under the LCs.
[JEB/mcp]
COPYRIGHT OF THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW & PRACTICE
The views expressed in this Case Summary are those of the Institute of International Banking Law and Practice and not necessarily those of ICC or the other partners in DC-PRO.